Atacamaptilia Vargas & Espinoza-Donoso, 2022
|
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5100.3.5 |
|
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:D89B8855-8990-4C27-97BB-48ECD57593F0 |
|
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6314252 |
|
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/8F768781-FF8F-3A30-FF58-4184FE42FA2A |
|
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
|
scientific name |
Atacamaptilia Vargas & Espinoza-Donoso |
| status |
gen. nov. |
Atacamaptilia Vargas & Espinoza-Donoso View in CoL gen. nov.
( Figs 1–10 View FIGURE 1 View FIGURE 2 View FIGURE 3 View FIGURE 4 View FIGURE 5 View FIGURE 6 View FIGURE 7 View FIGURE 8 View FIGURE 9 View FIGURE 10 )
Type species: Atacamaptilia ambrosiavora Vargas & Espinoza-Donoso sp. nov., designated here.
Diagnosis. Among the Neotropical genera of Acrocercopinae, Atacamaptilia resembles Eucosmophora Walsingham, 1897 and Vihualpenia Mundaca, Parra & Vargas, 2013 in the presence of a digitate lobe on the costal margin of the valva of the male genitalia ( Davis & Wagner 2005; Mundaca et al. 2013). However, the forewing with R4 and R5 stalked and CuA1 and CuP absent provides separation of Atacamaptilia from Eucosmophora , whose forewing has R4 and R5 separate and CuA1 and CuP present. Atacamaptilia has the forewing with R5 and M1 separate, which are stalked in Vihualpenia . Among the Old World genera of Acrocercopinae with a digitate lobe on the costal margin of the valva, Melanocercops Kumata & Kuroko, 1988 and Phodoryctis Kumata & Kuroko, 1988 resemble Atacamaptilia in having forewing venation with R4 and R5 stalked and CuA1 absent ( Kumata et al. 1988). However, Atacamaptilia has the phallus with a pair of longitudinal projections and the vesica without cornuti, while in Melanocercops the phallus lacks projections and the vesica has cornuti. In the female genitalia, the absence of signa in Atacamaptilia contrasts with the small plate-like signum in the corpus bursae of Melanocercops . Like Atacamaptilia , the phallus of Phodoryctis has a pair of long longitudinal projections, but these arise from near the base in the latter, in clear contrast to Atacamaptilia , whose projections arise near the middle. Furthermore, Phodoryctis has a well-developed lobe-like projection protruding from the distal end of the digitate lobe of the costa and a small, round subapical furrow not covered with setae on the distal part of the valva. In contrast, Atacamaptilia has a small blister-like membrane arising dorso-apically from the digitate lobe of the costa and lacks a subapical furrow not covered with setae on the distal part of the valva. Sternum VII of the female abdomen of Phodoryctis has a large, well-sclerotized area not covered with scales, a feature not found in Atacamaptilia .
Description. Adult ( Figs 2–3 View FIGURE 2 View FIGURE 3 ). Male and female similar in size and color.
Head. Vertex and frons smoothly scaled. Antenna filiform ( Fig. 2A View FIGURE 2 ), length similar to forewing. Maxillary palpus ( Fig. 2B View FIGURE 2 ) short, 4-segmented, smoothly scaled. Labial palpus ( Fig. 2B View FIGURE 2 ) about twice the length of maxillary palpus, 3-segmented, smoothly scaled.
Thorax. Forewing ( Fig. 2C View FIGURE 2 ) lanceolate; 11 veins, all reaching the margin. R 5-branched, all veins end at the costal margin; R1 from basal third of discal cell, ending shortly distal to Sc; R2 from near apex of discal cell; R3 from apex of discal cell; R4 and R5 stalked about half the length of R4. M 3-branched; all veins from distal margin of discal cell to inner margin. CuA 1-branched. 1A+2A slightly curved near base. Hindwing lanceolate ( Fig. 2C View FIGURE 2 ); R 2-branched; R1 and Rs end at costal margin. M 3-branched; all veins end at the inner margin; M1 and M2+3 stalked about half the length of M2+3. CuA 2-branched; CuA1 stalked with CuA2 about 2/3 the length of CuA2. CuP stalked with CuA1+2 about 2/3 the length of CuP. Legs with tibial spur pattern 0–2–4; epiphysis present.
Abdomen. Male with tergum VIII ( Fig. 2D View FIGURE 2 ) semicircular, anterior margin straight with narrow process in the middle, posterior margin broadly rounded; sternum VIII ( Fig. 2E View FIGURE 2 ) in the form of two small triangular sclerites separated medially by membrane.
Male genitalia ( Fig. 3A, C–E View FIGURE 3 ). Tegumen mostly membranous, with two narrow, elongated, sclerotized lateral sclerites not connected distally. Uncus absent. Subscaphium as a narrow longitudinal stripe. Saccus triangular, short, with rounded apex. Valva ( Fig. 3A, C View FIGURE 3 ) narrow, elongated, about 1.2x tegumen in length, apex widely rounded; medially with short hair-like setae; laterally with long hair-like setae from near base; digitate lobe arising from basal half of costa, posteriorly projected; a small blister-like membrane arising dorso-apically from digitate lobe. Phallus ( Fig. 3D, E View FIGURE 3 ) sub-cylindrical, narrow, elongated; basal half mainly membranous ventrally; apex acute; a pair of longitudinal projections arising ventrally from near the middle; vesica without cornuti.
Female genitalia ( Fig. 3B, F View FIGURE 3 ). Papillae anales touching each other dorsally; slightly sclerotized with hair-like setae and a narrow, well-sclerotized stripe along anterior margin. Antrum sclerotized, cylindrical, about a third of the length of posterior apophysis. Ductus bursae membranous, cylindrical, narrow, elongated, slightly widened near corpus bursae, and about 3.5× of the length of posterior apophysis. Corpus bursae membranous, oval, narrow, elongated, about 0.75x length of ductus bursae. Ductus seminalis arising from ductus bursae, immediately distal to antrum. Signum absent.
Etymology. The generic name is derived from the Atacama Desert, where the type species was discovered in one of its transverse valleys, and “-ptilia ”, a latinization from the Greek “ πτίΛΟΝ ” (plumage). The name is considered feminine in gender.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.