Astochia neavensis (Ricardo, 1919)
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.8370416 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8370484 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/963187C5-0C40-363E-FD97-D185925A8F0F |
treatment provided by |
Carolina |
scientific name |
Astochia neavensis (Ricardo, 1919) |
status |
|
Astochia neavensis (Ricardo, 1919) View in CoL Figs 11-12 View Figs 11-12
Neoitamus neavensis Ricardo, 1919: 72 View in CoL ; Hull, 1962: 557.
Astochia neavensis View in CoL ; Oldroyd, 1980: 336.
Redescription: based on lectotype ♀, unless otherwise stated.
Head: Antennae (broken off beyond segment 2) black with black bristles and setae (there are some yellow setae ventrally on segment 1). Mystax yellowish. Occipital bristles short, yellow and not proclinate. Proboscis and palpi blackish with yellow-white setae.
Thorax: Mesepimeral and hypopleural setae yellow-white. Mesonotal setae: dorsocentrals- 3 or 4 pairs fine black tiny setae anterior of suture; humerals-Iongish yellow-white setae only; presutulars-2 black; supra-alars- 2 black; postalars-2 black; scutellars-none. Metanotal callosities with yellow setae. Wings: 8,6 x 2,9 mm; venation and microtrichial distribution as in Fig. 11 View Figs 11-12 . Legs: forecoxa with yellow-white setae anteriorly; hindcoxa with a single, yellow bristle laterally. Femora largely dark red-brown but with tips yellow-brown. Tibiae yellow-brown with dark red-brown distal tips. Tarsi dark red-brown but basitarsi mostly yellow-brown. Setation of hindfemur: bristles (only 3) short black; longer setae (only 2- 3 basally) white; minor setae numerous, fine yellow-white.
Abdomen: Segments 1 -5 pruinose, rest shiny black. Ovipositor long and narrow ( Fig. 12 View Figs 11-12 ). Terga covered with short black setae (except for a few yellow ones laterally). Sterna with fewer setae, all yellowish. The ♂ is at present unknown.
Material examined: ZAIRE: 6 ♀, Lectotype and paralectotypes, 150-200 miles W. of Kambove, 3 500-4 500 ft, 25.x.1907, S.A. Neave ( BM) .
Remarks: As Ricardo's specimens must all be considered as syntypes I here designate one of the females in the BM as lectotype (and have labelled it as such). The other specimens are all to be considered as paralectotypes.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.