Paraniphargus Tattersall, 1925 ( Tattersall, 1925: 241 )

Labay, Vjacheslav S., 2016, Review of amphipods of the Melita group (Amphipoda: Melitidae) from the coastal waters of Sakhalin Island (Far East of Russia). III. Genera Abludomelita Karaman, 1981 and Melita Leach, 1814, Zootaxa 4156 (1), pp. 1-73 : 61-63

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4156.1.1

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:9A1549F0-1EBD-4FBF-B630-B4933105A978

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5014623

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/995B87D6-FFD8-FF88-FF3A-FC47C6140465

treatment provided by

Plazi

scientific name

Paraniphargus Tattersall, 1925 ( Tattersall, 1925: 241 )
status

 

Genus Paraniphargus Tattersall, 1925 ( Tattersall, 1925: 241) View in CoL

Figures 29–31 View FIGURE 29 View FIGURE 30 View FIGURE 31 .

Paraniphargus Tattersall, 1925 ( Tattersall, 1925: 241) View in CoL — Schellenberg, 1931: 500.— Barnard & Barnard, 1983: 675 –676.— Bamber, 2003: 206.

Melita View in CoL — Sawicki, Holsinger & Iliffe, 2005: 66.

Type species. Paraniphargus annandalei Tattersall, 1925: 242 .

Species. Paraniphargus contains 8 species P. almagosa ( Sawicki & Holsinger, 2005) , P. annandalei Tattersall, 1925 , P. cognata ( Stock & Vonk, 1992) , P. dulcicola ( Stock & Vonk, 1990) , P. latiflagella (Ren & Andress, 2008) , P. oba (J.L. Barnard, 1972) , P. ruttneri Schellenberg, 1931 , P. valesi ( Karaman, 1955) .

Diagnosis (new composition). Body slender. Head, anterior and posterior lobes protruding, rounded, sinus developed, obsolescent or absent. Eyes present or absent. Pleon segments without dorsal teeth. Urosome segment 1 with or without dorsal tooth. Urosome segment 2 without or with paired dorsal teeth and / or spine groups. Antennae strong; antenna 1 longer than 2.

Mandible ( Fig. 29 View FIGURE 29 a–f), right lacinia spike-like, multidenticulate; left lacinia 4-dentate, molar seta present on both left and right mandibles; palp is short, medium reduced, 3-articulate, article 3 is subequal or slightly shorter to article 2, article 2 with single seta, article 3 with 1–4 setae only. Maxilla 1 ( Fig. 29 View FIGURE 29 g–l), outer plate with 9 apical strong setae; inner plate subquadratic, elongated, with truncated distal margin, only 3–4 setae located along the distal margin, not on the inner margin. Maxilla 2, inner plate without or with distal medial marginal setae only. Maxilliped plates strong; palp segment 2 sublinear; article 3 bilobed or with rounded protruding on the inner margin; dactyl stout, curved.

Coxae 1–4 ( Figs. 29 View FIGURE 29 m–p, s; 30b–d, g) medium, uniformly deep, rounded below. Pereopod 1 (gnathopod 1) of males ( Fig. 29 View FIGURE 29 n–s), basis anteriorly setose or with only single seta; carpus slender, sublinear or long-triangular; propodus shorter, anterior margin convex, palm usually slightly excavated at basal part or no, usually without protruding rounded lobe at the posterior part; dactylus thin, curved, is not bulging basally. Pereopod 1 of female ( Fig. 29 View FIGURE 29 m), carpus relatively deep, lower margin convex; palm of propodus oblique or transverse, dactylus regular. Pereopod 2 (gnthopod 2) of males ( Fig. 30 View FIGURE 30 a–g), basis without anterior long setae; carpus short, deep, length of posterior lobe about half anterior margin; palm regulary convex, oblique, without distinct palmar angle and palmar tooth, setose; dactyl relatively short. Pereopod 2 of female relatively small, carpus and propodus shallow, subequal in length or carpus shorter than propodus; palm oblique, nearly straight, without palmar corner tooth.

Pereopod 3 subequal to pereopod 4, dactylus medium size or short. Pereopods 6 and 7 ( Fig. 30 View FIGURE 30 l–q) larger than pereopod 5; coxae 5 and 6 distinctly anterolobate; coxae 6 of females ( Fig. 30 View FIGURE 30 h–k), anterior lobe forming a shallow lobate or gently curved hook-like processes; bases broadened proximally and narrowed distally, lower lobes usually absent. Pereopod 5–7, merus long, thin; margins of propodus with short stout setae; dactylus short.

Pleon plate 3, hind corner with small tooth or rectangular. Uropod 1 ( Fig. 31 View FIGURE 31 a–c), peduncle with interramal spur, rami subequal or outer ramus slightly shorter. Uropod 2, rami subequal or outer ramus short, margins with 1– 2 lateral strong setae “spinose” each. Uropod 3 ( Fig. 31 View FIGURE 31 d–h), inner ramus very small; outer ramus strong, about twice length of, and broader than peduncle, margins of segment 1 with up to 8 clusters of stout setae (“spines”), segment 2 short or vestigial or absent.

Telson ( Fig. 31 View FIGURE 31 i–o) lobes short, narrowing distally, inner margins without or with one short stout seta (“spine”), apices subacute, each with 2–3 strong stout setae, lateral notches absent.

Coxal gills on pereopods 2–5 medium large, oval or suboval; gill on pereopod 6 distinctly smaller, less broad. Distribution. Tropical and equatorial regions of Pacific, Indian and Atlantic Oceans. Fresh and coastal sea waters; subterranean and interstitial.

Relationships: The genus Paraniphargus has intermediate features between the genera Melita and Tegano : mandibular palp medium reduced, 3-articulated, article 3 with 1–4 setae only; coxae 6 of females, anterior lobe forming a shallow lobate or gently curved hook-like process.

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Malacostraca

Order

Amphipoda

Family

Melitidae

Loc

Paraniphargus Tattersall, 1925 ( Tattersall, 1925: 241 )

Labay, Vjacheslav S. 2016
2016
Loc

Melita

Sawicki 2005: 66
2005
Loc

Paraniphargus Tattersall, 1925 ( Tattersall, 1925: 241 )

Tattersall 1925: 241
1925
Loc

Paraniphargus Tattersall, 1925 ( Tattersall, 1925: 241 )

Bamber 2003: 206
Barnard 1983: 675
Schellenberg 1931: 500
Tattersall 1925: 241
1925
GBIF Dataset (for parent article) Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF