Peucobius Townes, 1971
|
publication ID |
https://dx.doi.org/10.3897/jhr.95.98222 |
|
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:99C6279A-FA04-4E86-8AC6-ED33C9FD87B3 |
|
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/9AB41F06-3CA1-5E39-ACE1-43EDF42C12D9 |
|
treatment provided by |
|
|
scientific name |
Peucobius Townes, 1971 |
| status |
|
Genus Peucobius Townes, 1971 View in CoL View at ENA
Type species.
Peucobius fulvus Townes, 1971, by original designation.
Comparative diagnosis.
Peucobius can be distinguished from all other genera of Sisyrostolinae by the combination of the following characters: 1) fore wing without areolet, i.e. vein 3rs-m absent (Fig. 18 View Figures 18–20 ) (areolet present in Brachyscleroma ); 2) tarsal claws simple (pectinate in Laxiareola ); 3) anterior transverse carina of propodeum present (Fig. 3 View Figures 1–3 ) (carina absent in Melanodolius and some species of Erythodolius ); 4) clypeus unspecialized, evenly rounded in profile, without a transverse ridge, medial point or multiple or medial crenulations (Figs 5 View Figures 4–11 , 15 View Figures 12–17 ) (transverse ridge present in Lygurus ; medial point present in some species of Erythrodolius ; medial crenulations present in some species of Erythrodolius and Icariomimus ).
Within Sisyrostolinae , Peucobius has the smallest species with fore wing length 2.5-3.0 mm, while the genus with the next smallest species, Lygurus , has fore wing length 4.0-5.0 mm, and some other genera are much larger (e.g., 7.0-19.0 mm in Erythrodolius and 17.0-30.0 mm in Melanodolius ).
Description.
Small insects with fore wing length 2.5-3.0 mm. Head and mesosoma mostly finely granulate to subpolished, impunctate or partly with fine punctures. Head, in dorsal view, with gena strongly rounded posterior to eyes. Clypeus wide, 2.5-3.5 times as broad as long, lenticular, weakly convex, more or less flat medially, with a row of long fine setae on lower margin. Mouthparts short, unspecialized; maxillary and labial palp formula 5+4. Mandible bidentate, with teeth subequal by length or either upper or lower tooth somewhat longer than other. Malar space 0.8-1.0 times as long as basal mandibular width, with scabrous area between eye and mandibular base. Flagellum filiform, with 14-17 flagellomeres. Epomia absent. Notaulus short or absent. Scutellum with lateral longitudinal carinae very short. Sternaulus absent or as weak impression ventrolaterally in anterior part of mesopleuron. Epicnemial carina present. Posterior transverse carina of mesopleuron absent. Propodeum more or less fully carinate (as in Fig. 3 View Figures 1–3 ), sometimes carinae partly obliterated. Fore wing as in Fig. 18 View Figures 18–20 ; areolet absent, pterostigma relatively large, vein 2m-cu with one large bulla. Hind wing with nervellus (cu1&cu-a) intercepted below centre. Legs slender; fore tibia with a tooth-like projection on distal outer side; tarsal claws not pectinate. First metasomal tergite 1.8-2.5 times as long as posteriorly broad, with large glymma at base. Second tergite transverse; thyridum (if discernible) very small, oval, at base of tergite 2. Laterotergites 2 and 3 not separated by crease. Ovipositor long and slender, weakly upcurved, slightly swollen before apex (Fig. 11 View Figures 4–11 ).
Remarks.
In addition to two previously known Nearctic species of Peucobius , one species from Central Mexico and one from Japan are described. A distribution map (Fig. 27 View Figure 27 ) of three North American species and identification key to the four species of Peucobius occurring in the world are given below. We also provide a key to a new species of Peucobius discovered from the East Palaearctic region and two species of the morphologically similar genus Lygurus .
The new species from Mexico differs well from two other North American species, P. fulvus and P. piceus (see the key below). Peucobius fulvus and P. piceus are known to us from their original descriptions ( Townes 1971) and several specimens from USA and Canada. The length of mandibular teeth is found to work well for distinguishing these morphologically very similar species from each other, while the two features provided by Townes (1971), i.e. sculpture of mesoscutum and colouration of hind coxa, are less reliable and therefore must be used with caution.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.