Rhagoveliinae, China & Usinger, 1949
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5400.1.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:7B6AC3A4-9187-4336-AAC7-82C3FD046D29 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/A37987E3-2B40-0038-95EA-FEF5FA04625F |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Rhagoveliinae |
status |
|
Subfamily Rhagoveliinae View in CoL China & Usinger, 1949
Genus Rhagovelia Mayr, 1865
Species Groups
For the sake of organizational utility, the treatment of Rhagovelia species assemblages in various regions of the world has involved their subdivision into species groups (J. Polhemus & D. Polhemus 1988, D. Polhemus 1995, 1997; D. Polhemus & Andersen 2010, 2014; Zettel 1994, 1995, 1996, 2003, 2006, 2007). These species groups have been proposed on the basis of shared character states, and in many cases are likely to represent monophyletic clades within the genus, although not all have been phylogenetically validated, nor do they have any formal taxonomic standing under the current Code of Zoological Nomenclature. The Rhagovelia fauna of the EPCT may be assigned to three of these previously defined groups, the species within which are easily recognizable on the basis of their morphology and ecological preferences. Additional subgroups now recognized within these larger species groups are discussed in the present paper.
Key to the Species Groups of Rhagovelia View in CoL occurring in the EPCT
Males
Female characters also provided where useful.
1. Pronotum short, length along midline shorter than or subequal to length of head as viewed from directly above, leaving mesonotum broadly exposed ( Figs. 15 View FIG , 296 View FIG ); forewing with two elongate basal cells, followed by two distal cells of similar length and size ( Figs. 10 View FIGS , 14 View FIG )............................................................................ 2
- Pronotum longer, length along midline significantly greater than length of head as viewed from directly above, leaving only extreme posteromedial margin of mesonotum exposed ( Fig. 202 View FIG 202 ); forewing with two elongate basal cells, followed by two smaller distal cells of unequal length and size, with the outer distal cell smaller than the inner ( Fig. 12 View FIGS )................................................................................................. R. papuensis View in CoL group
2. General coloration black, brown, or orange-brown ( Figs. 15 View FIG , 35 View FIGS , 41 View FIGS , 48 View FIGS , 55 View FIGS , 63 View FIGS , 70 View FIGS , 77 View FIGS , 85 View FIGS , 99 View FIGS , 106 View FIGS , 118 View FIGS , 125 View FIGS , 133 View FIGS , 140 View FIGS , 146 View FIGS , 154 View FIGS , 161 View FIGS , 169, 171 View FIGS , 181 View FIGS , 189 View FIGS , 194 View FIGS ); anterior pronotum often with broad transverse band of yellowish coloration extending across entire width of pronotum and onto propleurae; males and females of similar size; male paramere large and elongate, often with distal section expanded ( Figs. 38 View FIGS , 45 View FIGS , 52 View FIGS , 59 View FIGS , 67 View FIGS , 74 View FIGS , 81 View FIGS , 89 View FIGS , 103 View FIGS , 114 View FIGS , 122 View FIGS , 129 View FIGS , 137 View FIGS , 143 View FIGS , 150 View FIGS , 158 View FIGS , 165 View FIGS , 176, 178 View FIGS , 185 View FIGS , 192 View FIGS , 198 View FIGS ); male proctiger with well-developed basolateral lobes ( Figs. 39 View FIGS , 46 View FIGS , 53 View FIGS , 60 View FIGS , 68 View FIGS , 75 View FIGS , 82 View FIGS , 90 View FIGS , 104 View FIGS , 115 View FIGS , 123 View FIGS , 130 View FIGS , 138 View FIGS , 144 View FIGS , 151 View FIGS , 159 View FIGS , 166 View FIGS , 177, 179 View FIGS , 186 View FIGS , 193 View FIGS , 199 View FIGS ); male hind femur incrassate to varying degrees, armed with numerous teeth and spines ( Fig. 37 View FIGS ); forewing with two elongate basal cells, followed by a one or two shorter distal cells, when two cells present both are of similar length but with the outer distal cell being narrower than the inner ( Fig. 10 View FIGS ).................................................................................................... R. novacaledonica View in CoL group
- General coloration silvery grey; anterior pronotum with only a small transversely ovate spot of orange-brown coloration immediately behind head vertex, flanked laterally by grey coloration, orange-brown coloration never extending laterally onto propleurae; sexually dimorphic in terms of size, with males usually smaller than females (except in R. riu ) (Figs. 297, 303, 310, 316, 321); male paramere small and ovate (Figs. 300, 306, 313, 319, 327); male hind femur slender or at most weakly incrassate, armature absent, or limited to a few small teeth ( Fig. 326 View FIGS ); forewing with two elongate basal cells, followed by one or two much smaller and shorter distal cells of subequal size ( Fig. 14 View FIG )............................... R. caesius View in CoL group
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.