Rhagovelia novacaledonica, Lundblad, 1936
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5400.1.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:7B6AC3A4-9187-4336-AAC7-82C3FD046D29 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/A37987E3-2B46-0027-95EA-FC91FA056601 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Rhagovelia novacaledonica |
status |
|
Rhagovelia novacaledonica View in CoL group
This species group was originally proposed by J. Polhemus & D. Polhemus (1988) to hold R. novacaledonica Lundblad from New Caledonia and R. biroi Lundblad from eastern New Guinea, with several other species from New Caledonia and the southern Philippines provisionally assigned. Based on a subsequent comparative analysis of male paramere morphology, Zettel (1994) and D. Polhemus (1995) formally proposed the placement of the following additional species in this group: R. pidaxa J. Polhemus & Herring from New Caledonia; R. werneri Hungerford & Matsuda and R. hoogstraali Hungerford & Matsuda from Mindanao; and R. thysanotos Lansbury , R. crinita Lansbury , R. aureospicata Lansbury and R. herzogensis Lansbury from New Guinea. Subsequently, D. Polhemus & J. Polhemus (2011) added another species, R. batantana , from the Raja Ampat Islands, and also provisionally assigned another new species from this archipelago, R. rajana from Batanta Island, to the group.
The R. novacaledonica group is characterized by the short pronotum in wingless forms that leaves the posterior and lateral portions of the mesonotum well exposed ( Figs. 15 View FIG , 35 View FIGS , 41, 42 View FIGS , 48,49 View FIGS , 55, 56 View FIGS , 63, 64 View FIGS , 70, 71 View FIGS , 77, 78 View FIGS , 85, 86 View FIGS , 99, 100 View FIGS , 106, 107, 109 View FIGS , 118, 119 View FIGS , 125, 126 View FIGS , 133, 134 View FIGS , 140, 141 View FIGS , 146, 147 View FIGS , 154, 155 View FIGS , 161, 162 View FIGS , 169, 170, 171, 172 View FIGS , 181, 182 View FIGS , 189, 190 View FIGS , 194, 195 View FIGS ); the large, elongate male paramere with setiferation on the basal half ventrally, and the distal section often expanded and usually forming a vertical flange apically ( Figs. 38 View FIGS , 45 View FIGS , 52 View FIGS , 59 View FIGS , 67 View FIGS , 74 View FIGS , 81 View FIGS , 89 View FIGS , 103 View FIGS , 114 View FIGS , 122 View FIGS , 129 View FIGS , 137 View FIGS , 143 View FIGS , 150 View FIGS , 158 View FIGS , 165 View FIGS , 176, 178 View FIGS , 185 View FIGS , 192 View FIGS , 198 View FIGS ); the male proctiger with prominent basolateral lobes, the distolateral lobes being only incipiently developed or absent, and a large, tapering distal cone with an angular apex ( Figs. 39 View FIGS , 46 View FIGS , 53 View FIGS , 60 View FIGS , 68 View FIGS , 75 View FIGS , 82 View FIGS , 90 View FIGS , 104 View FIGS , 115 View FIGS , 123 View FIGS , 130 View FIGS , 138 View FIGS , 144 View FIGS , 151 View FIGS , 159 View FIGS , 166 View FIGS , 177, 179 View FIGS , 186 View FIGS , 193 View FIGS , 199 View FIGS ); paired dorsal abdominal carinae in winged forms that are short, reaching at most onto abdominal tergite II; and the forewing with four closed cells, the two posterior cells having apices extending into the distal third of the wing ( Fig. 10 View FIGS ).
As currently interpreted, the R. novacaledonica group occupies an elongate geographic range along the western margin of the Pacific Plate, from New Caledonia northwestward through New Guinea to the southern Philippines (D. Polhemus 1995). Based on species described at the time of their work, J. Polhemus & D. Polhemus (1988) stated that “The few members of the novacaledonica group in New Guinea are presently known only from the north coast ranges and the Papuan Peninsula…By contrast, the papuensis group and other species groups derived from it have radiated extensively in the younger and more rugged central ranges…” This interpretation has proven incorrect on several levels. First, based current knowledge derived from far more extensive collections over the intervening 30 years, the majority of the rich Rhagovelia fauna occurring on New Guinea and adjacent islands at elevations above 500 m is composed of members of the R. novacaledonica group, which is the most speciose group on the island. Second, the accreted terranes of the New Guinea central ranges are latest Cretaceous to Eocene in age, and thus significantly older than the Oligocene to Miocene terranes of the northern coastal ranges (D. Polhemus 2007).
In the EPCT, members of the R. novacaledonica group are typical inhabitats of shaded, rocky upland streams ( Figs. 40 View FIG , 47 View FIG , 54, 61, 83, 98, 105, 116, 117, 124, 131, 139, 145, 160, 167, 180, 187, 200, 226, 233, 239, 265, 273, 280, 289, 302, 308, 329). Many species seem to be restricted to small first-order and second-order tributaries in catchment headwaters, with some species being found only in the final several hundred meters of a stream immediately below source springs. As a result, this group exhibits a marked degree of geographically circumscribed local endemism. Species of this group also have a degree of cold tolerance and occur at some of the highest localities occupied by any Gerromorpha in New Guinea, being found on streamlets up to 2600 m. elevation in the central highlands of the island.
The R. novacaledonica group is the largest and most species-rich group of Rhagovelia occurring in the EPCT. Within this assemblage a number of distinct subgroups can be recognized, which may potentially represent monophyletic clades within the larger group, although this has not yet been phylogenetically tested. The species included in each of these subgroups are as follows:
Rhagovelia tufi subgroup: R. bowutu n. sp., R. obscura n. sp., R. tufi n. sp., and R. upalai n. sp.
Rhagovelia goilala subgroup: R. goilala n. sp., R. udabe n. sp., and R. antap n. sp.
Rhagovelia dibuwa subgroup: R. awaetowa n. sp., R. dibuwa n. sp., R. kalawai n. sp.,
R. peninsularis n. sp., R. torrenticola n. sp., and R. watuti n. sp.
Rhagovelia auga subgroup: R. auga n. sp.
Rhagovelia peggiae subgroup: R. peggiae Kirkaldy and R. hirsuta Lansbury.
Rhagovelia kolukou subgroup: R. kolukolu n. sp. and R. mbo n. sp.
Species not assigned to a subgroup (treated as incertae sedis within the R. novacaledonica group):
R. aviavi n. sp., R. tekadu n. sp., R. mimani n. sp., and R. sapoi n. sp.
In addition, R. aureospicata Lansbury is now removed from the R. novacaledonica group and considered incertae sedis in the context of the overall New Guinea Rhagovelia assemblage, based on its male paramere morphology ( Fig. 335 View FIGS ) and the unusual armature of the male middle femur ( Fig. 333 View FIGS )
These subgroups are discussed in greater detail within the species treatments following the key, and also noted within the key in those instances where they fall out discretely within the couplet sequence.
Key to the Species of the Rhagovelia novacaledonica View in CoL Species Group occurring in the EPCT
Note: This key relies on both male and female characters, so a series containing both properly associated sexes is necessary for definitive identification. In the absence of one sex or the other, the figures provided, in association with geographic provenance, will also in many cases be sufficient to obtain an identification.
1. Female connexival margins not meeting at any point along their length (although the posterolateral angles may be convergent and inwardly folded to some degree), leaving all abdominal tergites visible along their central sections to some extent when viewed from above (although lateral margins of certain tergites may be covered) ( Figs. 36 View FIGS , 42 View FIGS , 49 View FIGS , 56 View FIGS , 64 View FIGS , 71 View FIGS , 78 View FIGS , 86 View FIGS , 93 View FIGS , 100 View FIGS , 107, 109 View FIGS , 119 View FIGS , 126 View FIGS , 170, 172 View FIGS , 189 View FIGS , 195 View FIGS ).....................................................................2
- Female connexival margins appressed or folded inward and meeting along some portion of their length, such that one or more abdominal tergites are covered across their central sections when viewed from above ( Figs. 134 View FIGS , 141 View FIGS , 147 View FIGS , 155 View FIGS , 162 View FIGS , 182 View FIGS ). 20
2. Black denticles present on inner prosternum and adjacent proacetabula, sometimes also extending onto the jugae and lower propleural area ( Fig. 32 View FIG ).................................................................................3
- Black denticles not present on the prosternum, proacetabula, jugae or lower propleurae.............................. 7
3. Smaller species, body lengths 3.0– 4.1 mm; female connexival margins with posterolateral angles often bending weakly inward over lateral portions of abdominal tergites VII or VIII, but never touching or completely covering an underlying tergite, although the hair tufts on the posterolateral angles may touch ( Figs. 36 View FIGS , 42 View FIGS , 49 View FIGS , 56 View FIGS ); male paramere ventrally bilobate ( Figs. 38 View FIGS , 45 View FIGS , 52 View FIGS , 59 View FIGS ); coloration predominantly black, with transverse orange-brown patch on anterior pronotum behind vertex discrete, bordered laterally with black and not confluent with orange-brown coloration on propleurae ( Figs. 35, 36 View FIGS , 41, 42 View FIGS , 48, 49 View FIGS , 55, 56 View FIGS ).................................................................................. R. tufi subgroup…4
- Larger species, body length ranging from 4.1–4.7 mm; female connexival margins straight, evenly convergent posteriorly, not inwardly folded to any degree, orientation either vertical or angling outward, leaving all abdominal tergites completely visible from above ( Fig. 189 View FIGS ); male paramere not ventrally bilobate, instead with distal arm parallel-sided and apically truncate, angled upward before apex when viewed laterally ( Fig. 192 View FIGS ); orange-brown coloration on anterior pronotum not forming a discrete transverse patch but instead broadly confluent laterally with orange-brown coloration on propleurae ( Figs. 188, 189 View FIGS )........
......................................................................................... R. sapoi n. sp.
4. Male abdominal ventrite VII with a broad, shallow, longitudinally ovate depression centrally, lateral margins of this depression not strongly raised or demarcated with dense bands of setae ( Figs. 16, 17 View FIGS ); length of female antennal segment I less than 2X the length of segment II.....................................................................................5
- Male abdominal ventrite VII strongly depressed centrally, this depression bounded laterally by a pair (1+1) of raised, setiferous longitudinal carinae ( Figs. 18, 19 View FIGS ); length of female antennal segment I equal to 2X the length of segment II..............6
5 Female abdominal tergites III–V with a raised longitudinal medial carina, this carina most prominent on tergite III, becoming progressively less well expressed on tergites IV and V; male abdominal tergite VII with shiny chestnut brown patch posteromedially; male genitalia as in Figs. 38, 39 View FIGS ; Cape Nelson area of northeastern Papuan Peninsula ( Fig. 62 View FIG ).............................................................................................. Rhagovelia tufi n. sp .
- Female abdominal tergites III–V without a raised longitudinal medial carina; male abdominal tergite VII shining black; male genitalia as in Figs. 45, 46 View FIGS ; Bowutu Mountains of northern Papuan Peninsula ( Fig. 62 View FIG )........... Rhagovelia bowutu n. sp.
6. Shining chestnut brown patches present centrally on female abdominal tergites V–VIII; male abdominal ventrite VII bearing deep, crescent-shaped depression centrally, this depressed area becoming broader and deeper posteriorly, lateral margins flanked by setiferous arcuate ridges ( Fig. 18 View FIGS ); male genitalia as in Figs. 52, 53 View FIGS ; southern Papuan Peninsula ( Fig. 62 View FIG )............................................................................................. Rhagovelia obscura n. sp.
- Shining patches absent on female abdominal tergites V–VIII, these tergites uniformly dull black; male abdominal ventrite VII with longitudinally rectangular depression centrally, lateral margins flanking this depression strongly raised, these raised margins bearing dense pads of short, dark setae posteriorly ( Fig. 19 View FIGS ); male genitalia as in Figs. 59, 60 View FIGS ; far eastern terminus of Papuan Peninsula ( Fig. 62 View FIG )............................................................ Rhagovelia upalai n. sp.
7. Female connexival margins strongly convergent adjacent to abdominal tergites I–III, then parallel adjacent to tergites IV and V before converging again adjacent to tergites VI–VIII ( Fig. 170 View FIGS )............................... Rhagovelia aviavi n. sp.
- Female connexival margins straight or at most very weakly sinuate, tapering evenly toward posterior margin of abdomen, widely separated throughout their lengths and not touching, angling slightly outward; all female abdominal tergites completely visible from above ( Figs. 64 View FIGS , 71 View FIGS , 78 View FIGS , 86 View FIGS , 100 View FIGS , 107, 109 View FIGS , 119 View FIGS , 126 View FIGS , 172 View FIGS , 195 View FIGS )....................................... 8
8. Ground color orange-brown ( Figs. 63, 64 View FIGS , 70, 71 View FIGS , 77, 78 View FIGS , 109 View FIGS ).................................................. 9
- Ground color black to dark blackish-grey ( Figs. 85, 86 View FIGS , 92, 93 View FIGS , 99, 100 View FIGS , 106, 107 View FIGS , 118, 119 View FIGS , 125, 126 View FIGS , 171, 172 View FIGS , 194, 195 View FIGS ).. 13
9. Female mesonotum entirely orange-brown ( Figs. 63, 64 View FIGS ); female abdominaltergite VII with width exceeding length; male paramere with deep notch on dorsal margin, apex expanded and truncate ( Fig. 67 View FIGS ); eastern Papuan Peninsula ( Fig. 84 View FIG )....................................................................................... Rhagovelia antap n. sp.
- Female mesonotum predominantly brown, with orange-brown coloration on central portion only, if present at all ( Figs. 70, 71 View FIGS , 77, 78 View FIGS , 109 View FIGS ); female abdominal tergite VII with length exceeding width; male paramere lacking deep notch on dorsal margin, apex not expanded and broadly truncate, instead rounded and often produced slightly upward to varying degrees ( Figs. 74 View FIGS , 81 View FIGS , 115 View FIGS , 129 View FIGS )........................................................................................... 10
10. Pale coloration on anterior pronotum consisting of a broad, orange-brown band extending laterally onto pleural region ( Fig. 70, 71 View FIGS , 77, 78 View FIGS ); dorsum densely covered with short, appressed golden setae; length of pronotum along longitudinal midline subequal to length of head; apex of male paramere distally truncate ( Figs. 74 View FIGS , 81 View FIGS ); larger species than below, body lengths ranging from 4.1–4.8 mm; Owen Stanley Range above 1000 m elevation ( Fig. 84 View FIG )…............................... 11
- Pale coloration on anterior pronotum confined to a transverse dark yellow patch immediately behind head, this coloration not extending laterally onto pleural region ( Fig. 85, 86 View FIGS , 92, 93 View FIGS , 99, 100 View FIGS , 106–109 View FIGS , 118, 119 View FIGS , 125, 126 View FIGS ); dorsum bearing only scattered short golden setae; length of pronotum along longitudinal midline clearly less than length of head; male paramere slightly transversely expanded apically, with dorsal margin forming a rounded, upward-angled lobe ( Fig. 89 View FIGS , 96 View FIGS , 103 View FIGS , 114 View FIGS , 122 View FIGS , 129 View FIGS ); body lengths ranging from 3.2–4.2 mm; D’Entrecaseteaux Islands ( Fig. 132 View FIG )................................ 12
11. Female connexiva with posterolateral angles bearing prominent posteriorly-directed tufts of black setae ( Fig. 71 View FIGS ); posterior margin of female pronotum weakly anteriorly concave centrally ( Fig. 71 View FIGS ); male paramere with apex broadly rounded and truncate, ventral margin of paramere broadly concave ( Fig. 74 View FIGS )............................... Rhagovelia udabe n. sp.
- Female connexiva with posterolateral angles lacking prominent posteriorly-directed setal tufts ( Fig. 78 View FIGS ); posterior margin of female pronotum weakly posteriorly convex centrally ( Fig. 78 View FIGS ); male paramere with apex forming a small, upwardly-directed angle, ventral margin of paramere nearly straight, only weakly concave ( Fig. 81 View FIGS )................ Rhagovelia goilala n. sp.
12. Male proctiger with basolateral lobes very broad, width of proctiger subequal to length including basal struts ( Fig. 130 View FIGS ); large species, body length 4.0– 4.2 mm; Goodenough Island ( Fig. 132 View FIG )......................... Rhagovelia torrenticola n. sp.
- Male proctiger with basolateral lobes not as broad as above, width of proctiger distinctly less than length, even excluding basal struts ( Fig. 115 View FIGS ); medium-sized species, body length 3.4–3.7 mm; Normanby Island ( Fig. 132 View FIG )..... Rhagovelia dibuwa n. sp.
13. Male paramere with distal arm straight, narrow, parallel sided, apex truncate ( Fig. 198 View FIGS ); female abdominal tergites bearing only a single small, irregular shining patch posteromedially on tergite VII........................ Rhagovelia mimani n. sp.
- Male paramere much thicker, distal arm not slender or parallel-sided, produced into an upward-angling, rounded distal lobe ( Figs. 89 View FIGS , 96 View FIGS , 103 View FIGS , 114 View FIGS , 122 View FIGS , 129 View FIGS ); female abdominal tergites bearing shining patches on multiple tergites in addition to tergite VII............................................................................... R. dibuwa subgroup...14
14. Female dorsal abdomen with shining patches present on tergites V–VIII......................................... 15
- Female dorsal abdomen with shining patches less extensive, absent on tergite V, and sometimes also absent on tergite VI.. 18
15. Posterolateral angles of female connexiva lacking tapering setal tufts when viewed laterally, bearing only a few scattered setae ( Fig. 21 View FIGS ); male paramere strongly expanded distally, with a pointed, upwardly-angling apex ( Fig. 96 View FIGS ); far eastern terminus of Papuan Peninsula ( Fig. 132 View FIG )...................................................... Rhagovelia peninsularis n. sp.
- Posterolateral angles of female connexiva bearing tapering setal tufts to some degree when viewed laterally ( Figs. 20, 22–25 View FIGS ); male paramere only moderately expanded distally, with a broadly rounded, upwardly-angling apex ( Fig. 89 View FIGS , 103 View FIGS , 114 View FIGS , 122 View FIGS , 129 View FIGS ); D’Entrecasteaux Islands, China Strait islands, or Cloudy Mountains ( Fig. 132 View FIG )............................... 16
16. Female with shining patches present on abdominal tergites VII and VIII only; angled distal process on male paramere elongate, length when measured along posterior margin about 2 times the width of the central paramere shaft ( Fig. 89 View FIGS ); Cloudy Mountains ( Fig. 132 View FIG )........................................................................ Rhagovelia watuti n. sp.
- Female with shining patches present on abdominal tergites VI–VIII at least, sometimes also present on tergite V; distal process on male paramere shorter than above, length when measured along posterior margin distinctly less than 2 times the width of the central paramere shaft ( Fig. 103 View FIGS , 114 View FIGS , 122 View FIGS , 129 View FIGS ); D'Entrecastaux Islands and China Strait Islands ( Fig. 132 View FIG )............. 17
17. Ratio of midline length of pronotum to midline length of head in males 1.5 or greater; base of male proctiger with a pair of well-developed, raised carinae ( Figs. 104 View FIGS , 115 View FIGS ), these carina triangular and sharply pointed when viewed laterally ( Fig. 5 View FIGS ); posterior margin of female abdominal ventrite VII may be produced into a posteriorly-directed, triangular process medially ( Fig. 29 View FIGS ); smaller species, body length 3.7 mm or less............................................................... 18
- Ratio of midline length of pronotum to midline length of head in males 1.35 or less; base of male proctiger with a pair of weakly developed, raised carinae ( Figs. 123 View FIGS , 130 View FIGS ), these carina low and obtuse when viewed laterally; posterior margin of female abdominal ventrite VII not produced into a posteriorly-directed, triangular process medially, at most bearing a slightly rounded medial projection ( Figs. 30, 31 View FIGS ); larger species, body length 4.0 mm or greater.....................................19
18. Female with shining patches present on abdominal tergites VI–VIII only; posterior margin of male abdominal ventrite VII with shallow, angular indentation centrally ( Fig. 28 View FIGS ); ground coloration dark grey with limited orange-brown markings ( Fig. 99, 100 View FIGS ), forms with orange-brown ground coloration not currently known; Sideia and Basilaki Islands ( Fig. 132 View FIG )........................................................................................... .. Rhagovelia kalawai n. sp.
- Female with shining patches present on abdominal tergites V–VIII; posterior margin of male abdominal ventrite VII more produced and acute, lacking a shallow, angular indentation centrally ( Fig. 29 View FIGS ); ground coloration polymorphic, varying from predominantly dark grey to predominantly orange-brown ( Figs. 107, 109 View FIGS , and see couplet 9 above); Normanby Island ( Fig. 132 View FIG )............................................................................. Rhagovelia dibuwa n. sp.
19. Ground coloration polymorphic, varying from predominantly dark grey ( Figs. 125, 126 View FIGS ) to predominantly orange-brown (and see couplet 9 above); male proctiger with basolateral lobes very broad, width of proctiger subequal to length including basal struts ( Fig. 130 View FIGS ); male paramere with central section of apical lobe possessing a small translucent patch ( Fig. 129 View FIGS ) resembling a window; Goodenough Island ( Fig. 132 View FIG ).......................................... .. Rhagovelia torrenticola n. sp.
- Ground coloration dark grey with limited orange-brown markings ( Figs. 118, 119 View FIGS ), forms with orange-brown ground coloration not currently known; male proctiger with basolateral lobes not as broad as above, width of proctiger less than length, even excluding basal struts ( Fig. 123 View FIGS ); male paramere with central section of apical lobe opaque, lacking translucent patch ( Fig. 122 View FIGS ); Fergusson Island ( Fig. 132 View FIG )....................................................... Rhagovelia awaetowa n. sp.
20. Female connexiva strongly infolded, closely convergent or appressed over the tops of abdominal tergites V–VIII, covering all or significant portions of tergites V–VIII when viewed from above ( Figs. 141 View FIGS , 147 View FIGS , 155 View FIGS , 162 View FIGS )........................ 21
- Female connexiva not as strongly infolded as above, convergent posteriorly, touching at or near posterior apices, covering portions of abdominaltergites VII or VIII ( Figs. 134 View FIGS , 182 View FIGS ).................................................... 22
21. Male fore tibia concave and bearing a curving brush of setae distally, appearing spatulate ( Fig. 133 View FIGS ); large species, body length 4.4–4.9 mm; coloration predominantly black with limited dark orange markings ( Figs. 133, 134 View FIGS )......................................................................................... R. auga subgroup… Rhagovelia auga n. sp.
- Male fore tibia slender throughout, not expanded and bearing a brush of setae distally; smaller species, body length 3.2–4.0 mm; coloration dark reddish brown with extensive yellow and orange markings ( Figs. 181, 182 View FIGS ).... Rhagovelia tekadu n. sp.
22. Anterior portion of pronotum bearing a transversely ovate dark orange or yellowish patch in the area behind the head vertex ( Figs. 140, 141 View FIGS , 146, 147 View FIGS ), this patch bordered laterally by areas of dark coloration overlain with prunosity, which extend laterally on the propeura, intergrading to brown on the proacetabula; male paramere distally expanded to varying degrees, not slender and tapering ( Figs. 143 View FIGS , 150 View FIGS ); male proctiger with prominent, laterally projecting basolateral lobes ( Figs. 144 View FIGS , 151 View FIGS ); New Guinea ( Fig. 153 View FIG )............................................................. .. R. peggiae View in CoL subgroup...23
- Anterior portion of pronotum with broad, dark yellow transverse band behind head ( Figs. 154, 155 View FIGS , 161, 162 View FIGS ) that is confluent laterally with similar yellowish coloration extending laterally and ventrally to cover the propelura and proacetabula; male paramere slender and tapering ( Figs. 158 View FIGS , 165 View FIGS ); male proctiger with basolateral lobes absent or at most incipiently developed ( Figs. 159 View FIGS , 166 View FIGS ); Louisiade Archipelago ( Fig. 168 View FIG )........................................ R. kolukolu subgroup...24
23. Small black denticles present on prosternum adjacent to rostrum, and on inner portions of proacetabula; male paramere distinctively produced to an upturned quadrate process distally ( Fig. 143 View FIGS ); southern Papuan Peninsula ( Fig. 153 View FIG )........................................................................................ Rhagovelia peggiae Kirkaldy View in CoL
- Prosternum and inner proacetabula lacking small black denticles; male paramere slender, with apex acutely pointed, ventral margin gently bilobate ( Fig. 150 View FIGS ); northern central Papuan Peninsula ( Fig. 153 View FIG ).............. Rhagovelia hirsuta Lansbury View in CoL
24. Males with abdominal ventrite VI broadly and shallowly depressed; apex of male paramere hooked slightly downward ( Fig. 158 View FIGS ); posterolateral angles of female connexiva lacking tufts of stiff black setae ( Fig. 155 View FIGS ); Tagula Island ( Fig. 168 View FIG )....................................................................................... Rhagovelia kolukolu n. sp.
- Males with both abdominal ventrite VI and VII broadly and shallowly depressed centrally; apex of male paramere hooked slightly upward ( Fig. 165 View FIGS ); posterolateral angles of female connexiva bearing bushy tufts of stiff black setae ( Fig. 162 View FIGS ); Rossel Island ( Fig. 168 View FIG ).................................................................... .. Rhagovelia mbo n. sp.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |