Anomaloglossus baeobatrachus (Boistel & de Massary, 1999 )
|
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4576.3.2 |
|
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:067AD8E3-22F2-4874-B80E-ECE3FD96F968 |
|
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.3717697 |
|
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/A72B87FF-E96F-6C11-99E8-29A05833F9C7 |
|
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
|
scientific name |
Anomaloglossus baeobatrachus (Boistel & de Massary, 1999 ) |
| status |
|
Anomaloglossus baeobatrachus (Boistel & de Massary, 1999)
Figs. 2–5 View FIGURE 2 View FIGURE 3 View FIGURE 4 View FIGURE 5
Neotype. MNHN2018.31 View Materials (field n o AF2589 ), an adult male, collected by Jean-Pierre Vacher, 21 February 2015, Saint Eugène , French Guiana, 4.82167° N 53.06766° W, ~ 60 m elevation ( Figs. 2 View FIGURE 2 , 3 View FIGURE 3 ). GoogleMaps
Additional specimens examined. Twenty-one specimens: MNHN2018.34–36 (field n°AF0207–8, 0214) two adult males and one female, collected by A. Fouquet and Régis Gallais, 0 8 April 2007, Angoulème, French Guiana, 5.383333° N 53.650000° W, ~ 20 m elevation. MNHN2018.37 (field n°AF0244) an adult female, collected by A. Fouquet, 10 May 2007, Nouragues field station, French Guiana, 4.083333° N 52.683333° W, ~ 100 m elevation. MNHN2018.38 (field n°AF0821) an adult male, collected by A. Fouquet, 31 December 2012, Chutes Voltaire, French Guiana, 5.031222° N 54.087778° W, ~ 60 m elevation. MNHN2018.39–40 (field n°AF1839, 1841) two adult males, collected by A. Fouquet and Jean-Pierre Vacher, 24 March 2014, RN2 corridor 3, French Guiana, 4.10583° N 52.05096° W, ~ 50 m elevation. MNHN2018.41–44 (field n°AF2098-9, 2101-2) four adult males, collected by A. Lorenzini, 0 1 April 2014, RN2 corridor 5, French Guiana, 4.03297° N 51.99078° W, ~ 50 m elevation. MNHN2018.32–33 (field n°AF2590-1) two adult males with same data as neotype. MNHN2018.45–48,50 (field n°AF2667, 2704-6, 2709) four adult males and MNHN2018.49 (field n°AF2707) and adult female, collected by Jean-Pierre Vacher, 18 February 2015, Alikéné, French Guiana, 3.21153° N 52.39981° W, ~ 280 m elevation. MNHN2018.51–52 (field n°AF2942, 2963) an adult female and an adult male, collected by Antoine Fouquet and Pedro S. Nunes, 15 March 2015, Mémora, French Guiana, 3.31774° N 52.19329° W, ~ 50 m elevation.
Definition. (1) A small-sized Anomaloglossus (average male SVL 16.2 mm [14.8–17.1, n = 16], female SVL 18.4 mm [17.3–19.4, n = 4]) ( Table 1); (2) body robust; (3) skin tuberculate on dorsum (particularly the posterior half) and legs, with a large tubercle on each eyelid, ventral skin smooth; (4) diffuse supratympanic fold; (5) tympanic annulus distinct anteroventrally; (6) snout short and protruding in lateral view; (7) nares oriented ventrolaterally, situated near tip of snout; (8) Finger II same length as Finger I when fingers adpressed; (9) tip of Finger IV reaching distal subarticular tubercle on Finger III when fingers adpressed; (10) distal subarticular tubercle distinct on Finger III but absent on the other fingers; (11) Finger III swollen dorsally and preaxially extending largely on dorsal surface of hand in males, with well-developed lateral fringe in females; (12) Fingers II with preaxial fringes in both sexes; (13) toes basally webbed, with fringes on all toes more developed preaxially on Toe II and pre- and postaxially on Toes III and IV (sensu Grant et al. 2006; keel-like lateral folds sensu Myers & Donnelly 2008); (14) tarsal keel well-defined, curved; (15) black arm gland at the junction of distal forearm with wrist in males (sensu Grant & Castro 1998, see also Grant et al. 2006); (16) cloacal tubercles present; (17) paracloacal mark present (orangish in life, cream in preservative); (18) dorsolateral stripe present, discontinuous (bluish to yellowish particularly posteriorly in life, white in preservative), flanks and dorsum dark brown in males paler in females; (19) ventrolateral stripe absent; (20) sexual dichromatism in throat color present, in life sometimes anteriorly and laterally yellow in males, evenly yellow in females, with sparse black melanophores; (21) sexual dichromatism in ventral color present, in life abdomen mostly cream with flanks often yellow in males, abdomen entirely and uniformly bright yellow in females in life; (22) iris with metallic pigmentation and pupil ring interrupted ventrally and dorsally by transversal black pigmentation; (23) median lingual process as long as wide, tapered, bluntly pointed, smooth (non-papillate), reclined in pit; (24) call 0.84– 1.33 s long, consisting of a train of 13–28 pulsed notes 0.018– 0.021 s long spaced by intervals of 0.043– 0.047 s, dominant frequency at 4.960–5.591 kHz (n = 9); (25) tadpole of type 2 ( Orton 1953), endotrophic, with bare mouth and prominent trophic reserves ( Fig. 4 View FIGURE 4 ; Table 2).
Morphological comparisons with other Anomaloglossus . The only other species group co-occurring with the Anomaloglossus stepheni group is the A. degranvillei group, currently represented by A. blanci Fouquet, Vacher, Courtois, Villette, Reizine, Gaucher, Jairam, Ouboter & Kok, 2018 , A. degranvillei ( Lescure, 1975) , A. dewynteri Fouquet, Vacher, Courtois, Villette, Reizine, Gaucher, Jairam, Ouboter & Kok, 2018 , and A. surinamensis Ouboter & Jairam, 2012 , which are readily distinguishable by their moderate webbing (basal in A. baeobatrachus ) and well-developed fringes on all toes (smaller and more developed on Toe II, III, IV) and the absence of a dorsolateral stripe (present). Outside these two groups all the other described Anomaloglossus species exclusively occur in Pantepui (i.e., the Guiana Shield highlands, see Kok et al. 2018) and have moderate to extensive toe webbing except A. meansi Kok, Nicolaï, Lathrop & MacCulloch, 2018 , A. kaiei ( Kok, Sambhu, Roopsind, Lenglet & Bourne, 2006) , A. rufulus ( Gorzula, 1990) and A. roraima ( La Marca, 1997) . However, unlike A. baeobatrachus , these last four species lack developed fringes on toes.
Within the Anomaloglossus stepheni group, A. baeobatrachus can be distinguished from A. stepheni ( Figs. 2– 3 View FIGURE 2 View FIGURE 3 , Table 1) by (1) skin of dorsum irregularly tuberculate in A. baeobatrachus vs. evenly tuberculate in A. stepheni ; (2) ventral coloration with yellow shades, at least posteriorly in males in A. baeobatrachus vs. entirely translucent white in A. stepheni ; (3) dorsolateral line thin and interrupted in A. baeobatrachus vs. thick and ill-defined margins dorsally in A. stepheni ; (4) call much longer (mean = 1.12, range 0.84– 1.33 s) in A. baeobatrachus [n = 9] vs. mean = 0.25, range 0.18– 0.29 s in A. stepheni [n = 4]) emitted at a slower pace (call rate mean = 0.33, range 0.18–0.48 calls/s in A. baeobatrachus [n = 11] vs. mean = 1.40, range 1.10–1.89 calls/s in A. stepheni [n = 4]), with a higher dominant frequency (mean = 5.39, range 4.96–5.59 kHz in A. baeobatrachus [n = 6] vs. mean = 4.48, range 4.30– 4.85 kHz in A. stepheni [n = 4]).
Anomaloglossus baeobatrachus can be distinguished from A. leopardus ( Figs. 2–3 View FIGURE 2 View FIGURE 3 , Table 1) by (1) a smaller body size (mean = 16.2; range 14.8–17.1 mm in males [n = 16] and mean = 18.4; range 17.3–19.4 mm in females [n = 4] in A. baeobatrachus vs. mean = 18.8, range 18.5–19.2 mm in males [n = 10] and mean = 21.1, range 20.5– 21.5 mm in females [n = 4] in A. leopardus ); (2) dorsal coloration uniformly dark brown with inconspicuous dark transverse bars on legs in A. baeobatrachus vs dorsal coloration with large dark blotches, particularly visible in preservative and conspicuous dark transverse bars on legs in A. leopardus ; (3) ventral coloration with yellow restricted to the posterior part in males in A. baeobatrachus vs. generally entirely yellow in A. leopardus ; (4) dorsolateral line thin and discontinuous in A. baeobatrachus vs. thick and continuous in A. leopardus ; (5) call with a faster note rate (mean = 16.1, range 15.7–16.8 note/s in A. baeobatrachus [n = 9] vs. mean = 13.4, range 12.9– 13.6 notes/s in A. leopardus [n = 4]) with a higher dominant frequency (mean = 5.39, range 4.96–5.59 kHz in A. baeobatrachus [n = 6] vs. mean=4.49, range 4.40–4.57 kHz in A. leopardus [n = 4], Table 2).
Description of the neotype. An adult male, 15.9 mm SVL; body robust; head wider than long, HL 94 % of HW; HL 32 % of SVL; dorsal skin irregularly tuberculate, one enlarged tubercle on each eyelid, snout long (SL 55 % of HL), rounded to nearly truncate in dorsal view, protruding in lateral view, extending past lower jaw. Nares located anterolaterally; canthus rostralis rounded, loreal region concave; IN 44 % of HW; EN 31 % of HL, 70 % of ED. Tympanum distinct anteroventrally; supratympanic fold diffuse; choanae small, circular, located anterolaterally to palatine ( Fig. 3 View FIGURE 3 ).
Forelimb slender, skin dorsally tuberculate; metacarpal ridge present; HAND 24 % of SVL; Finger I longer than Finger II when fingers adpressed; fingers large and flattened without webbing, lateral fringes present on preaxial edges of Fingers II; Finger III distinctly swollen dorsally and preaxially; tip of Finger IV not reaching distal subarticular tubercle on Finger III when fingers adpressed; finger discs expanded, wider than long, about 1.5X width of digit; width of disc on Finger III 0.5 mm; discs with distinct dorsal scutes. Relative lengths of adpressed fingers III> IV> I> II; palmar tubercle large, heart-shaped, 0.7 mm in diameter (larger than Finger III disc), thenar tubercle small (equal to Finger III disc), elliptic, half the size of palmar tubercle, well separated from palmar tubercle. Only basal subarticular tubercles on Fingers I, II and IV are conspicuous; Subarticular tubercle of Finger I larger than Finger II and IV subarticular tubercles.
Hind limb robust, skin dorsally tuberculate; TL 47 % of SVL; heels not in contact when hind limbs are flexed at right angle to sagittal plane of body; FL 42 % of SVL; relative length of adpressed toes IV> III> V> II> I; Toe I very short, its tip reaching the base of subarticular tubercle on Toe II when toes adpressed; toe discs larger than width of toes; disc on Toe I only slightly larger than width of digit. Width of disc on Toe IV 0.7 mm. Feet poorly webbed; lateral fringes present on all toes. Toe webbing formula I 1 + –1 - II 1 + –1 - III 1 ½ –1 ½ IV 0–1 + V. One to three subarticular tubercles on toes as follows: one on Toes I and II, two on Toes III and V, three on Toe IV. Inner metatarsal tubercle protuberant elliptical, 0.5 mm in length, outer metatarsal tubercle round, protuberant, 0.3 mm in diameter. Tarsal keel well defined, tubercle-like and strongly curved at proximal end. Metatarsal fold conspicuous and strongly curved.
Color of neotype in life. Dorsal color uniformly dark brown. Discontinuous pale dorsolateral stripes consisting of irregular bluish, white, orangish and yellow (near groin) small blotches ( Fig. 2 View FIGURE 2 ). Dark brown lateral band extending from tip of snout to the groin and containing the indistinct dorsal part of tympanum. Upper lip with small iridescent light blue blotches. Lower flanks pale yellow with small iridescent white blotches. Throat anteriorly yellow, centrally white and posteriorly pinkish, covered with melanophores more densely anterolaterally; belly centrally white and laterally and posteriorly yellow, ventral surface of thighs and arms pale orange. Iris with copper metallic pigmentation and pupil ring interrupted dorsally and ventrally by transversal dark pigmentation ( Fig. 2 View FIGURE 2 ).
Upper arm pale orange dorsally with a conspicuous proximal white spot, anteriorly and posteriorly light brown with small bluish spots. Lower arm light brown with ill-defined dark brown blotches and small bluish spots. Dorsal surfaces of thigh, shank and tarsus dark brown with ill-defined darker blotches. Paracloacal marks orangish, elongated anteroposteriorly. Toes and digits with small light blue dots. Palms and soles dark brown.
Color of neotype in preservative. After three years in 70 % ethanol, some colors of the specimen faded and the dorsal coloration now varies from brown to grey and the yellow ventral coloration disappeared. All bluish freckles and orange and reddish marks turned cream ( Fig. 3 View FIGURE 3 ).
Variation. Measurements (range, mean, and standard deviation) are provided in Table 1. Adult dorsal coloration varies from brown to reddish brown in males, females being paler and with more conspicuous darker dorsal blotches. The dorsolateral line varies from almost continuous to continuous; bluish flecks may be numerous or absent. Additionally, overall coloration and tuberculation may vary with light intensity, time of the day and probably reproductive activity as males carrying tadpoles apparently display overall lighter colors, smoother skin and sharper contrasts while calling males are very dark and highly tuberculate. Ventral coloration of female is entirely yellow while the yellow parts are limited in various extent to the posterior region and throat in males. Vocal sac, slits and small dark melanophores on throat only observed in males as well as swelling on the Finger III.
Advertisement call. Nine specimens (two not collected) calling from the leaf litter were recorded from a distance of about 1 m and at temperatures ranging from 23 to 26°C. Descriptive statistics of call parameters are presented in Table 2. Anomaloglossus baeobatrachus emits trains (call length mean = 1.12 s; range 0.84– 1.33 s) of short notes (note length mean = 0.019 s; range 0.018– 0.022 s; inter-note interval mean = 0.045 s; range 0.043– 0.046 s) ( Fig. 4 View FIGURE 4 ). The spectral structure of the note has a developed harmonic structure and the dominant frequency is 5.39 kHz on average (range 4.96–5.59 kHz) with a slight upward modulation (ca. 0.2 kHz) ( Fig. 4 View FIGURE 4 , Table 2).
Larval morphology. The following description is based on four tadpoles at stage 30, 32, 33 and 34 ( Fig. 5 View FIGURE 5 ). Measurements are presented in Table 3. Tadpoles correspond to Type 2 tadpoles of Orton (1953) although an external spiracle is absent; tadpoles endotrophic; body skin smooth; TL 10.86–12.92 mm; BL 3.97–4.62 mm, 36– 37 % of TL, 141–159 % of BW, 212–241 % of BH; BW 137–171 % of BH ( Table 2); body inflated from trophic reserves until stage 33 when it becomes ovoid; round snout in dorsal and lateral view; eyes positioned and directed laterally ( Fig. 5 View FIGURE 5 ); ED 0.46–0.68 mm, 65–81 % of IOD; IOD more than IND; nares positioned frontally and directed laterodorsally; narial opening reniform in lateral view; END 0.2 8– 0.40 mm. Spiracular tube absent. Lateral-line system inconspicuous. Caudal musculature highest at its base, tapering posteriorly, terminating at tail tip; tail tip rounded; upper fin originating at junction of body and tail, gradually increasing in height to about 3/4 of tail; UTF 39–50 % of TMH; LTF 26–42 % of TMH; MTH 15–18 % of TL. Mouth small and bare (without marginal papillae, labial teeth nor sheaths), directed ventrally, oral disc width 0.5 mm (from edges of jaws) ( Fig. 5 View FIGURE 5 , Table 3).
In life, until stage 32 the entire body is light grey except the tail fins that are translucent and the abdomen that is yellowish. From stage 33 the body becomes dark grey with golden speckles, and the tail and fin become translucent posteriorly ( Fig. 5 View FIGURE 5 ).
Tadpoles of Anomaloglossus baeobatrachus can be distinguished from those of any other Anomaloglossus of the stepheni group (except A. apiau and A. stepheni ) by the absence of functional mouth and the prominent trophic reserves. Only two other Anomaloglossus with an endotrophic tadpole have been described, A. stepheni ( Juncá et al. 1994) and A. degranvillei ( Lescure 1984) ; although the latter may in fact correspond to A. surinamensis or A. blanci ( Fouquet et al. 2018) . Tadpoles of A. baeobatrachus can be distinguished from those of Anomaloglossus stepheni by the absence of a spiracle (present in A. stepheni ), a mouth located anteriorly to the eyes (at the level of the eyes in A. stepheni ), eyes located dorsolaterally (laterally in A. stepheni ), a proportionally shorter tail – BL 36– 37 % of TL (vs. 33 % in A. stepheni ) ( Juncá et al. 1994). They can be distinguish from tadpoles of A. degranvillei by the presence of an oral disc (absent in A. degranvillei ), presence of a vent tube (absent in A. degranvillei ), eyes located dorsolaterally (laterally in A. degranvillei ) and by their development, which is not completed on the back of the male parent.
Distribution and natural history. Populations of Anomaloglossus baeobatrachus have been documented throughout French Guiana and the state of Amapá in Brazil ( Fig. 1 View FIGURE 1 ). However, southern FG and Amapá populations form genetic clusters distinct from the ones from northern FG, where lies the type locality ( Fouquet et al. 2019). These three clusters remain indistinguishable based on call and morphology and display similar larval development modes ( Fouquet et al. 2019). The species is absent west of the Maroni River where it is replaced by A. stepheni , a species that seems to have a similar niche. A similar situation may occur on the eastern margin of the Jari River (state of Pará, Brazil) but too few surveys are available to confirm that hypothesis. Several still undescribed species with exotrophic larvae have been confused with A. baeobatrachus ( Vacher et al. 2017) in Suriname ( Ouboter & Jairam 2012) and in Pará state (Avila-Pires et al. 2011). Populations with exotrophic larvae have also been documented in French Guiana and Amapá but are assumed to have undergone historical admixture and their status remains ambiguous ( Fouquet et al. 2019).
Anomaloglossus baeobatrachus is a diurnal species inhabiting the leaf litter in primary and secondary terrafirme forest at low to mid elevations (from 10 to 800 m elevation). It can be found alongside or far from any water bodies. Males call all day long when the weather is rainy, with two apparent peaks of daily activity, a minor one in the morning (08:00–11:00h) and a major one at the end of the day (15:00–18:00h). The species seems to be more abundant on slopes and plateaus. Males aggregate in groups of two to several dozen individuals. Breeding occurs mainly at the beginning of the rainy season (December to April). Males respond to playback of intraspecific advertisement calls with shorter and more rapidly emitted trills and also emit a different vocalization during courtship. They are territorial and defend, sometimes engaging in physical contact, territories of approximately 13 m ² ( Deschamps 2005), which are separated by a few meters only. Males usually call slightly above the leaf litter, exposed on a branch or a leaf. Males generally use the same calling and oviposition sites throughout the season ( Deschamps 2005). Eggs are usually deposited in the fold of a dead leaf. Breeding behaviours are very similar to those observed in A. stepheni in central Amazonia ( Juncá 1998), although these species are not each other’s sister group ( Vacher et al. 2017). When a female approaches a calling male, the male emits shorter and more rapid trills and then directs the female to an oviposition site that seems to have been previously chosen ( Deschamps 2005). If the female is receptive, the mating will last approximately 5–6 h, consisting of two phases between which the male leaves the nest. While the pair is inside the nest a soft irregular vocalisation is emitted. Because of the amount of trophic reserve required for the endotrophic development of embryos, the eggs are large and limited in number (from 3 to 5). It has been observed that the female lays beforehand (shortly before the eggs) a series (from 14 to 39) of small gelatinous spheres on which the eggs will be secondarily deposited and fertilized. These spheres inflate and fuse after 48 hours to form a single gelatinous mass in which the eggs bathe, probably serving as protection ( Deschamps 2005). Eggs usually take nine days to hatch and several successive clutches can be pooled on the same leaf ( Deschamps 2005). We do not know if successive clutches are deposited by the same female and if the reproduction system is polygamous. It will take another twenty days for the tadpoles to metamorphose.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
|
Kingdom |
|
|
Phylum |
|
|
Class |
|
|
Order |
|
|
Family |
|
|
Genus |