Patrera ruber (F. O. Pickard-Cambridge, 1900 )

Martínez, Leonel, Brescovit, Antonio D., Villarreal, Eduardo & Oliveira, Luiz Fernando M., 2021, An update of morphological and distributional data of the genus Patrera Simon (Araneae: Anyphaenidae: Anyphaeninae) with the description of twenty-five new species from Colombia, Zootaxa 4914 (1), pp. 1-64 : 8

Patrera ruber (F. O. Pickard-Cambridge, 1900)

Figures 2A ̅ G; 30

Teudis ruber F. O. Pickard-Cambridge, 1900: 102 , pl. 7, fig. 23 (Female holotype from Guatemala, deposited in BMNH, examined).

Teudis foliatus Schmidt, 1971: 411 , figs 16–17 (Female holotype and male allotype from Ecuador, deposited in FMS 25782 /1 and FMS 25795 , examined). Synonymized by Brescovit (1997: 35–36).

Patrera ruber: Brescovit, 1997: 35 , figs 53–56.

Material examined. COLOMBIA, Nariño: Altaquer, Reserva Natural Río Ñambí (1°14′45.22″N; 78°6′54.71″W), ♁1, 1440m, 5.VII.2017, W. Galvis leg. (ICN-Ar-9674); Same locality, date and collector, ♁1, (ICN-Ar-9672); same locality, ♁1, ♀ 1, 17-27.VII.2012, M. Medrano, A. García, Y. Cifuentes & D. Martínez leg. (ICN-Ar-5353) .

Diagnosis. Males of Patrera ruber resemble those of P. dimar n. sp., by having a basal cymbial process ( Figs 2 C–D; 8C–D; Brescovit 1997: 147, figs 53–54), but can be distinguished by having small denticles on base of the embolus, extending to the apical region of the embolus and thin retrolateral tibial apophysis (wider in P. dimar ) ( Fig. 2 C–E). Females resemble those of P. dimar and P. perafani n. sp., by their shape of the ventral epigynal plate and large spermathecae ( Fig. 8 F–G; Brescovit, 1997: 146–147, 55–56), but can be distinguished by their larger and thinner hood (wider in P. dimar and P. perafani ), and lateral borders with a external notch on the anterolateral side (no notch in P. dimar ) ( Fig. 2 F–G).

Description: Male and female described by Brescovit, 1997: 35–36.

Distribution. Guatemala, Costa Rica, Colombia, Ecuador.