Platynopus scutellatus, (Platynopus)
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5232.1.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:E7B67882-2148-49C5-9F09-D5CAA95A21D1 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10556056 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/A948651B-FD2D-FFC3-D68E-FBCDFE1770C3 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Platynopus scutellatus |
status |
|
scutellatus (Platynopus) Distant 1900a: 57. [ Fig. 179 View FIGURES 177–184 ]
Original data: “ Hab. Upper Congo, Bopoto (Coll. Dist).” [syntype (s)]
SYNTYPE ♀: blue-margined syntype disc; “Bopoto Upper Congo ”; “ scutellatus Dist. [Distant’s handwriting]; “Distant Coll. 1911–383.”; “NHMUK 010592436”. Fifth right and left antennomeres missing ( Fig. 179 View FIGURES 177–184 ) .
Current status: Platynopiellus scutellatus (Distant, 1900) (see Thomas 1994: 194–195).
Notes: Thomas (1994: 195) did not mention any type in his material examined. This may be because the specimen was not marked as type prior to this study and possibly because Distant had not distinguished it as such by writing the word “type” on its label, as was his usual practice. This urged us to query at what point Distant had added this indication on his determination labels (see Material and methods—Early type labels). The implications of this study being that when Distant has mentioned the type in the original description and given a specimen a type label in the collection, it may be claimed that Distant has designated a holotype in the original description.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Platynopus scutellatus
Roell, Talita, Lemaître, Valérie A., Webb, Michael D. & Campos, Luiz A. 2023 |
scutellatus (Platynopus)
Distant, W. L. 1900: 57 |