Arma obscura, (Arma)
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5232.1.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:E7B67882-2148-49C5-9F09-D5CAA95A21D1 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10556010 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/A948651B-FD5C-FFB2-D68E-FD01FA98717F |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Arma obscura |
status |
|
obscura (Arma) Dallas 1851: 100. [ Fig. 130 View FIGURES 129–136 ]
Original data: “ ♀ ”; “a. Brazil. Presented by E. Doubleday, Esq.” [syntype (s)]
LECTOTYPE ♀ (designated by Thomas 1992: 89): purple-margined lectotype disc; red-margined type disc; “ Brazil / 45 67; “20. ARMA OBSCURA ,”; “a”; “NHMUK 010592329”. Fifth right antennomere, third to fifth left antennomere, and right anterior and posterior legs missing; genital plates disjointed ( Fig. 130 View FIGURES 129–136 ).
Current status: Podisus nigrispinus ( Dallas, 1851) (synonymised by Thomas 1992: 88).
Note: Thomas (1992: 89) explained: “The type of Arma obscura , a female, was located in the British Museum (Natural History). It is labeled: (a) “Type,” (b) “ Brazil,” (c) “a,” (d) “20. Arma obscura .”” From Dallas’s original description, we do not know whether Dallas had one or more specimens, only the sex: female. Walker (1867a: 137) listed one specimen from the same provenance and we have found only one female specimen in the collection but cannot be sure it was the only one Dallas had. By giving its labels data and calling the specimen “the type”, Thomas designated it as the lectotype by inference of “the type” ( ICZN 1999: Art. 74.6).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Arma obscura
Roell, Talita, Lemaître, Valérie A., Webb, Michael D. & Campos, Luiz A. 2023 |
obscura (Arma)
Dallas, W. S. 1851: 100 |