Podisus amulae, Herrich-Schaffer, 1853
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5232.1.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:E7B67882-2148-49C5-9F09-D5CAA95A21D1 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7615898 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/A948651B-FD72-FF9C-D68E-F9E1FA2772DF |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Podisus amulae |
status |
|
amulae (Podisus ) Distant 1889: 319. [ Fig. 9 View FIGURES 9–16 ]
Original data: “ Hab. MEXICO, Amula in Guerrero (H. H. Smith).” [syntype (s)]
LECTOTYPE ♁ (designated by Thomas 1992: 84): purple-margined lectotype disc; red-margined type disc; “ Amula, Guerrero, 6000ft. Aug. H. H. Smith. ”; “ Podisus amulae Dist. [Distant’s handwriting]”; “NHMUK 010592319”. Specimen well preserved ( Fig. 9 View FIGURES 9–16 ).
Current status: Podisus congrex (Stål, 1862) (synonymised by Thomas 1992: 83–84).
Note: Thomas (1992: 84) explained: “The type of Podisus amulae , a male, was located in the British Museum (Natural History). It is labeled: a) “Type,” b) “ Podisus amulae Distant ,” c) “Amula Guat. 600 ft. Aug. H.H. Smith.”” From Distant’s original description, we do not know whether Distant had one or more specimens, nor the sex. We have found only one specimen in the collection but cannot be sure it was the only one Distant had. By giving its labels data (albeit unprecisely—“Guat” for “ Guerrero ” and “600” for “6000”) and calling the specimen “the type”, Thomas designated it as the lectotype by inference of “the type” ( ICZN 1999: Art. 74.6).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Podisus amulae
Roell, Talita, Lemaître, Valérie A., Webb, Michael D. & Campos, Luiz A. 2023 |
amulae (Podisus
Distant, W. L. 1889: 319 |