Hoploxys coeruleus
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5232.1.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:E7B67882-2148-49C5-9F09-D5CAA95A21D1 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7615935 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/A948651B-FD7D-FF91-D68E-F8F5FBEA77AB |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Hoploxys coeruleus |
status |
|
coeruleus (Hoploxys) Dallas 1851: 103 . [ Fig. 34 View FIGURES 33–40 ]
Original data: “ ♀ ”. “a. Congo. Presented by Sir John Richardson, M. D.” [syntype (s)]
SYNTYPE ♀: blue-margined syntype disc; red-margined type disc; “ Congo / 43 56”; “1. HOPLOXYS CAERULEUS,”; “a”; “NHMUK 010592440”. Antennae and legs (except the left middle leg and a part of the left anterior leg) missing. The specimen is also missing its right wing, while its abdomen is partially disconnected from its thorax ( Fig. 34 View FIGURES 33–40 ) .
Current status: Hoploxys coeruleus Dallas, 1851 .
Notes: As Dallas (1851: 103) noted “Antennae with the two basal joints black (rest wanting [emphasis ours])”, it is likely that he had only one specimen. Walker (1867a: 141) listed only one specimen and we have found only one female specimen in the collection. Still, we cannot be sure Dallas just described the species from one specimen, we therefore consider it a syntype. This specimen was not examined by Thomas (1994: 181) who only mentioned having examined specimens from the Democratic Republic of the Congo (as Zaire), Gabon and Cameroon and not the type.
David & Dickinson (2016: 15) remarked: “Names that in their original form used ligatures are incorrect original spellings (Art. 27) but when the ligature is resolved and two letters replace it the names become correct original spellings (Art. 32.2.2.).” and later, p. 20, “Article 58.1 (I.C.Z.N., 1999) states that species-group names that contain -ae- and -oe-, but are otherwise identical, are deemed to be homonyms when included in the same genus (Art. 58); indeed, classical Latin dictionaries list coerul- as a variant of caerul- ( Gaffiot, 1934).” Dallas (1851: 79) had originally named the species “ HOPLOXYS COERULEUS ”; this was an incorrect original spelling. The correct original spelling should be “coeruleus”, as in our entry and current status. Walker’s (1867a: 141) heading (and thus label) reads “ HOPLOXYS CAERULEUS”; this is an incorrect subsequent spelling.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Hoploxys coeruleus
Roell, Talita, Lemaître, Valérie A., Webb, Michael D. & Campos, Luiz A. 2023 |
coeruleus (Hoploxys)
Dallas, W. S. 1851: 103 |