Acumontia echinata Pocock, 1903, Pocock, 1903

Mendes, Amanda C. & Kury, Adriano B., 2012, Notes on the systematics of the Triaenonychinae from Madagascar with description of a new species of Acumontia Loman (Opiliones: Laniatores), Zootaxa 3593, pp. 40-58: 43

publication ID

http://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.210296

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:28EA6439-289E-4CBB-B427-397F6A4B54C0

DOI

http://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5662786

persistent identifier

http://treatment.plazi.org/id/AC3E87F8-690D-4E10-FF47-FBD216A1BB23

treatment provided by

Plazi

scientific name

Acumontia echinata Pocock, 1903
status

 

Acumontia echinata Pocock, 1903  

( Figs. 2 View FIGURE 2 A–B, 13)

Acumontia rostrata   (part, ♀ only): Pocock 1902: 407, fig. 82 B.

Acumontia echinata Pocock 1903: 441   ; Staręga 1992: 280.

Triacumontia echinata: Roewer 1915: 124   , fig. 33; Roewer 1923: 613; Lawrence 1959: 44.

Type data. 3 holotype, (originally reported as Ƥ syntype of A. rostrata   ), ( BMNH, examined), from MADAGASCAR, [FIANARANTSOA], Ambohimitombo.

Notes. Pocock (1902) firstly mistook this species for females of A. rostrata   and even illustrated one specimen as a female of that species. Later, Pocock (1903) interpreted the “females” as males and females of an undescribed species, which he then described as A. echinata   . Roewer (1915; 1923) simply repeated Pocock’s figures, not having seen any material, and included this species in Triacumontia   .

Diagnosis. Differs from A. pococki   and A. rostrata   by the tubercles of anterior margin of carapace much smaller than cheliceral sockets. Differs from A. hispida   , A. horrida   , A. nigra   , A. roeweri   , A. soerenseni   , A. spinifrons   and A. venator   by having the apophysis of ocularium unbranched. Differs from A. cowani   by the size of spines of areas II–III comparable to the armature of ocularium (and not much smaller). Differs from A. majori   and A. roberti   by spines of areas II–III subequal (from area III not much longer and stouter than of area II), and widely separated at the base. Differs from A. armata   , A. capitata   , A. flavispina   , A. hystrix   , A. majori   , A. remyi   , A. succinea   sp. nov., A. venator   by the presence of two tubercles on dorsum of the trochanter of pedipalps. Differs from A. alluaudi   , A. capitata   , A. cowani   , A. flavispina   , A. hispida   , A. horrida   , A. hystrix   , A. longipes   , A. milloti   , A. remyi   and A. succinea   sp. nov. by the shape of the two ventro-basal apophyses of the femur of pedipalps blunt instead of spiniform. Differs from A. alluaudi   , A. flavispina   , A. hispida   , A. horrida   and A. succinea   sp. nov. by having five tarsomeres in tarsus I of male.

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Arachnida

Order

Opiliones

Family

Triaenonychidae

Genus

Acumontia

Loc

Acumontia echinata Pocock, 1903

Mendes, Amanda C. & Kury, Adriano B. 2012
2012
Loc

Triacumontia echinata:

Lawrence 1959: 44
Roewer 1923: 613
Roewer 1915: 124
1915
Loc

Acumontia echinata

Starega 1992: 280
Pocock 1903: 441
1903
Loc

Acumontia rostrata

Pocock 1902: 407
1902