Cratosomus Schoenherr, 1825: c.585
publication ID |
https://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.683.12080 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:D7FD86CA-6374-480C-821B-A10C26CDDF32 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/AE78CE65-43ED-5404-BF39-37BFC4914EAE |
treatment provided by |
|
scientific name |
Cratosomus Schoenherr, 1825: c.585 |
status |
|
Cratosomus Schoenherr, 1825: c.585 Figs 21 View Figures 19–36 , 38 View Figures 37–45 , 68 View Figures 67–70
= Atenismus Chevrolat, 1880: L [Syn.: Emden 1933: 505]. Type species: Atenismus spinipennis Chevrolat, 1880 [by monotypy].
= Gorgus Schoenherr, 1825: c.585 [Syn.: Gyllenhal 1837: 13]. Type species: Cryptorhynchus lentiginosus Germar, 1824 [by original designation].
= Gorgus Schoenherr, 1826: 279 (non Schoenherr, 1825) [Syn.: Gyllenhal 1837: 32]. Type species: Curculio dubius Fabricius, 1787 [by original designation] (= Curculio bombina Fabricius, 1787).
( Eucratosomus ) Kuschel, 1945: 361. Type species: Cryptorhynchus sticticus Germar, 1824 [by original designation].
Type species.
Rhynchaenus herculeanus Dalman, 1823 [by original designation] (= Rhynchaenus roddami Kirby, 1819).
Gender.
Masculine.
Diagnosis.
Cratosomus can be differentiated from the other Piazurines treated here by the setal tufts of the anterior margin of the tibial apex being composed of thick fascicles of golden setae (Fig. 21 View Figures 19–36 ), the dense setal brush at the posterodistal face of the meso- and metatibia (Fig. 21 View Figures 19–36 ), the thick rostrum that is apically dorsoventrally compressed, and generally larger body size. The eyes can be small and widely separated (Fig. 38 View Figures 37–45 ) or large and approximate; the femora are ventrally with 0-2 teeth, usually with a distinct ventral carina distally; and the elytra and pronotum are often tuberculate or spinose.
Notes.
This genus includes some of the largest Neotropical weevils (Champion 1906: 1). Males of some species have lateral tusk-like processes of the rostrum and are presumably under sexual selection and used during male-male competitions.
Keys .
Emden 1933 (Central and South America), Champion 1906: 2 (Central America).
Phylogenetic relationships.
Schoenherr’s (1838) classification included Cratosomus in a separate Cohors of Cryptorhynchides, thereby distinguished from the rest of the then-described Conoderinae . Although somewhat dissimilar in appearance to the Piazurini treated here, it resembles the South American piazurine genera Latychus Pascoe, 1872 (and likely also the South American Costolatychus Heller, 1906, and Latychellus Hustache, 1938, but no specimens were observed of those genera) in the thickened dorsoventrally compressed rostral apex, the smaller and relatively widely separated eyes (as in some Cratosomus ), and the small ventral femoral tooth.
Host associations.
R.S. Anderson (1993: 218) lists Annonaceae Juss., Rutaceae Juss., Lauraceae Juss., Myrtaceae Juss., and Sapotaceae Juss Hosts for several species of Brazilian Cratosomus are recorded by Costa-Lima (1956: 213).
Described species.
Twenty-five species are known from the focal region (with 14 subspecies or forms) and an additional 126 species (and many subspecies or forms) are known exclusively from South America ( Wibmer and O’Brien 1986: 254; Rheinheimer 2011: 66 described one more).
Range.
Mexico, Belize, Guatemala, Honduras, Nicaragua, Costa Rica, Panama; South America. Distributions of Guadeloupe and the Lesser Antilles are listed with doubt by Emden (1933: 532) and subsequent catalogs.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
Cratosomus Schoenherr, 1825: c.585
Anzaldo, Salvatore S. 2017 |
Atenismus
Chevrolat 1880 |
Cryptorhynchus sticticus
Germar 1824 |