Anisops exiguus Horváth, 1919
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.13244673 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/B22C87F3-1448-E02E-FF5D-F856E1FAFAD0 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Anisops exiguus Horváth, 1919 |
status |
|
Anisops exiguus Horváth, 1919 View in CoL
Anisops exigua Horváth, 1919 .
Anisops exigera - Brooks, 1951 (misspelling, redescription); Fernando & Cheng, 1974; Fernando & Leong, 1976.
Diagnosis. – Generally a small, sordid white, shiny species. Greatest width at pronotal humeri. Lateral margins of abdomen with hemielytra, anteriorly parallel, posteriorly converging.
Length, male 4.3-4.8, female 4.3-5.2; width, male and female 1.2-1.4.
In dorsal view the head is anteriorly truncate with vertex slightly indented. Width of head 0.8-0.9 times the humeral width of pronotum and about six times anterior width of vertex. Synthlipsis very narrow, one fifth to one eighth the anterior width of vertex. Labrum without specialized bristles. Male. Tylus slightly swollen with a smooth surface. Rostral prong slightly shorter than third rostral segment, originating in its proximal third ( Fig. 16 View Figs ). Forefemur apically narrowed. Stridulatory comb on foretibia with 9-11 teeth which are longest in the middle.
Female. Tylus flat.
Brachypterous form unknown.
Remarks. – Anisops exiguus is very similar to A. lansburyi . Males can be recognized by the rostral prong, which is short in A. exiguus and long in A. lansburyi ( Figs. 16, 17 View Figs ). In addition the stridulary comb on the foretibia although similar in the number and structure of its teeth, lacks the one or two small teeth present apically in A. lansburyi ( Fig. 21 View Figs ). Females of A. exiguus are comparatively broader than those of A. lansburyi but these species are difficult to distinguish in the female sex. (See also under A. niveus ).
Distribution. – A widespread species, recorded from Papua New Guinea, Malaysia, Vietnam and India ( Brooks, 1951; Lansbury 1964). Fernando & Cheng (1974) and Fernando & Leong (1976) recorded it from Kedah and Johor. In ZRC there are samples from Melaka, Selangor, Johor and Bukit Timah Nature Reserve, (13 Dec.1996, coll. T. Wong, H. K. Lua et al.), first record for Singapore. The species is apparently widespread in the Malay Peninsula but has been collected infrequently, and with only a few specimens in each sample.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |