Eucampesmella sulcata ( Attems, 1898 ), 2021
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.3897/zoologia.38.e66300 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:492A24F4-9357-440E-BF1F-77D6E440963F |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13348657 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/B56F87D4-FF87-FFBE-82F9-883FFACFE19C |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Eucampesmella sulcata ( Attems, 1898 ) |
status |
stat. nov. |
Eucampesmella sulcata ( Attems, 1898) View in CoL , stat. rev.
Figs 30, 31
Cordyloporus sulcatus Attems, 1898: 364 View in CoL (Male from the state of Bahia, Brazil, deposited in ZMH, not examined [gonopods missing]); Attems, 1938: 379; Weidner, 1960: 82; Hoffman, 1967: 186.
Prepodesmus sulcatus : Chamberlin, 1952: 330
Leptodesmus tuberculiporus Attems, 1898: 384 View in CoL (Based upon the same type-specimen of Cordyloporus sulcatus View in CoL , see Hoffman, 1967: 185); Brölemann, 1909: 73; Attems, 1938: 42; Schubart, 1948: 87 (synonymized under Eucampesmella lartiguei View in CoL ; revalidated by Hoffman, 1967: 186); Weidner, 1974: 114.
Pseudoleptodesmus tuberculiporus View in CoL : Attems, 1931: 31.
Eucampesmella tuberculipora View in CoL : Hoffman, 1967: 186 (comments on the synonymy under L. lartiguei View in CoL and revalidation of E. tuberculipora View in CoL ).
Diagnosis. Males of Eucampesmella sulcata stat. rev. differ from all other species of Eucampesmella by the presence of a slender and long solenomere (similar to E. tricuspis , but differing by acropodital process being divided into two branches in the apical portion); internal branch of the process of the acropodite subrectangular in shape in ectal view ( Fig. 31). The prefemoral process of E. sulcata stat. rev. similar to males of E. expansa by having elongated and slender secondary process ( Fig. 30); but differing from E. expansa by absence of rounded projection on the tip of the prefemoral process and also its length (overreaching the acropodite in E. expansa ).
Additional material examined. BRAZIL: “Soledad?”, 1 male, 15.iii.1903, Austrian Brazilian Expedition coll. ( NHMW) .
Distribution. Known only from Bahia state.
Remarks. The epithet name tuberculipora was given priority by Hoffman (1967) over sulcatus (for more details, Hoffman 1967: 183-185). However, the prevalence of tuberculipora is in disagreement with the reversal of precedence (ICZN, article 23.9.). The supposed junior synonym (in this case, tuberculipora ) has not been used in at least 25 published works by at least 10 authors (see condition 23.9.1.2.). Based on this, herein we suggest the maintenance of sulcatus (in concordance with feminine gender, Eucampesmella sulcata ).
NHMW |
Naturhistorisches Museum, Wien |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Eucampesmella sulcata ( Attems, 1898 )
Bouzan, Rodrigo S., Iniesta, Luiz Felipe M., Pena-Barbosa, João Paulo P. & Brescovit, Antonio D. 2021 |
Eucampesmella tuberculipora
Hoffman RL 1967: 186 |
Prepodesmus sulcatus
Chamberlin RV 1952: 330 |
Pseudoleptodesmus tuberculiporus
Attems CG 1931: 31 |
Cordyloporus sulcatus
Hoffman RL 1967: 186 |
Weidner H 1960: 82 |
Attems CG 1938: 379 |
Attems CG 1898: 364 |
Leptodesmus tuberculiporus
Weidner H 1974: 114 |
Hoffman RL 1967: 185 |
Hoffman RL 1967: 186 |
Schubart O 1948: 87 |
Attems CG 1938: 42 |
Brolemann HW 1909: 73 |
Attems CG 1898: 384 |