Bashimyzon cheni, Gong & Zhang, 2024

Gong, Xiong & Zhang, E, 2024, Bashimyzon cheni, a new genus and species of sucker loach (Teleostei, Gastromyzontidae) from South China, Zoosystematics and Evolution 100 (1), pp. 309-324 : 309

publication ID

https://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zse.100.116535

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:634807EE-E59F-4698-853D-B757C00AEB99

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/8E5656C2-1F1A-4085-962F-45D1594B1D58

taxon LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:act:8E5656C2-1F1A-4085-962F-45D1594B1D58

treatment provided by

Zoosystematics and Evolution by Pensoft

scientific name

Bashimyzon cheni
status

sp. nov.

Bashimyzon cheni sp. nov.

Figs 5 View Figure 5 , 6 View Figure 6 , 7 View Figure 7

Type material.

Holotype. IHB 202109064273, 28.3 mm SL; Guangxi Province: Nanning City: Mashan County: Wuming-He, a stream tributary to You-Jiang of Zhu-Jiang basin, at Xinyang Village (23°35'05"N, 108°15'38"E, roughly 237m above sea level) of Gulin Town; collected by X. Gong, D. M. Guo and Y. Liu; 17 September 2021.

Paratypes. IHB 202109064274-78, 5 specimens, 28.3-39.9 mm SL; other data same as holotype. IHB 202303064712-36, 25 specimens, 35.0-42.7 mm SL; Guangxi Province: Nanning City: Wuming District: Wuming-He, a stream tributary to You-Jiang of Zhu-Jiang basin, at Jiaobei Village (23°31'27"N, 108°18'24"E, about 176 m above sea level) of Liangjiang Town; collected by X. Gong, D. M. Guo and P. Shan; 21 March 2023.

Diagnosis.

Bashimyzon cheni is clearly distinguished from the single congeneric species B. damingshanensis in having 8-9 teardrop-shaped black blotches wider than interspaces, with the majority portion of each blotch located above the lateral line on the flank (vs. 12 irregular black bars narrower than interspaces, and located along the lateral line on the flank; see Figs 5 View Figure 5 , 6 View Figure 6 ); fewer rows of blackish spots across dorsal-fin rays (3 vs. 4); fewer lateral-line pored scales (84-86 vs. 88-95); a gradual (vs. abrupt) upward dorsal profile of head in front of nostrils (Fig. 8A View Figure 8 ); a deeply (vs. slightly) curved rostral groove, or the greater (vs. less) distance from the median point of the distal margin of the upper lip to the anterior-most tip of the snout than half of the mouth width (Fig. 8B View Figure 8 ), a distinct (vs. indistinct) incision on both side of the fleshy pad of the lower lip (Figs 2B View Figure 2 , 7 View Figure 7 ).

Description.

General body shape and appearance illustrated in Figs 5 View Figure 5 , 6 View Figure 6 and lateral view of head in Fig. 7 View Figure 7 . Morphometric measurements and meristic counts provided in Table 3 View Table 3 . Body moderately elongate, anteriorly nearly cylindrical, slightly deeper than wide or both equal, and posteriorly compressed laterally, with greatest depth at dorsal-fin origin, and greatest width at middle of pectoral-fin base. Caudal peduncle stout, deeper than long, with minimum caudal-peduncle depth closer to caudal-fin base. Dorsal profile of head gradually rising from anterior-most tip of snout to posterior end of supraoccipital and predorsal body slightly convex or straight; dorsal profile of dorsal-fin base and post-dorsal body slightly concave. Ventral profile of head straight, then slightly convex from pectoral-fin insertion to anal-fin origin, and evenly rising towards caudal-fin base.

Head longer than deep, and shallower than wide. Snout broadly rounded in dorsal view and obtuse in lateral view, nearly equal to postorbital head. Eyes small, situated dorsolaterally in half of head, with broad and slightly flat interorbital space. Anterior and posterior nostrils close together, and short tubular flap on anterior nostril. Mouth small, inferior and arched in ventral view. Rostral fold modified into three rounded, fleshy lobes; median one wider than or equal to two lateral ones, separated from upper lip by distinct shallow groove. Lips fleshy and smooth; upper lip broad and curved, reflected on base of upper jaw; lower lip restricted to corners of mouth. Upper and lower lips continuous around corner of mouth, with small notch on confluence between both anterior to corners of mouth. A small papilla present on this notch, but indistinct in some individuals. Postlabial groove widely interrupted, or short and restricted only to corners of mouth, so leaving an anteriorly bilobed median fleshy pad on chin. A distinct incision also on both side of the fleshy pad. Upper and lower jaws bearing thick, flexible horny sheaths on cutting edges. Lower jaw largely exposed. Two pairs of rostral barbels; outer pair larger than inner pair. Maxillary-barbel pair rooted at corners of mouth, longer than rostral-barbel pair. A very small fleshy lobe posterior to maxillary barbel present on lower lip. Gill opening relatively large above pectoral-fin base, with its lower extremity extending away from the pectoral-fin insertion.

Scales minute, cycloid. Lateral line complete, with 84-86 pored scales, slightly curved upwards about half of pectoral-fin length, then downwards to posterior end of anal-fin base, extending along middle of caudal-peduncle to caudal-fin base. No scales on head, abdomen adjacent to ventral midline extending for three-fourths of distance between pectoral- to pelvic-fin insertions, and post-pelvic ventral region in front of anus. Numerous small tubercles densely distributed in suborbital portions of head and sides of snout; not obvious in other areas of body. Vertebrae 4+29-30.

Dorsal fin with three unbranched and seven branched rays; distal margin truncate or straight; origin anterior to pelvic-fin insertion, and closer to caudal-fin base than to snout tip. Pectoral fins with three unbranched and seven branched rays, enlarged and expanded laterally, longer than head; inserted slightly in front of lowest extremity of gill opening; tip of adpressed fin extending away from pelvic-fin insertion; last three or four branched rays folded dorsally against flank, shorter than others. Gap between posterior margin of eye and vertical through pectoral-fin insertion nearly equal to eye diameter. Pelvic fins short and not fused, with one unbranched and seven or eight branched rays; inserted slightly closer to caudal-fin base than to snout tip; tip of adpressed fin reaching anus, but far away from anal-fin origin. Anal fin with two unbranched and five branched rays; distal margin truncate; origin closer to caudal-fin base than to pelvic-fin insertion; and tip of adpressed fin reaching caudal-fin base. Anus located midway from posterior end of pelvic-fin base to anal-fin origin or slightly behind. Caudal-fin emarginated, lower lobe slightly longer than upper lobe.

Coloration.

In freshly-captured specimens, background of body yellowish or whitish yellow, with 8-9 vertical brown blotches of variable size on flank, oblong prodorsally and teardrop-shaped below dorsal-fin base and postdorsally (Fig. 6B View Figure 6 ). In formalin-stored individuals, body faded to lighter brown. Blotches on flank only 2/3 of body depth, wider than interspaces, and interrupted on dorsum. Dorsal surface of body covered with 7-8 dark elliptical patches along dorsal midline; predorsal patches usually linked to each other. Body pale yellowish-cream on ventral and ventrolateral surfaces, with some small blackish blotches located above pelvic-fin base. Pectoral-fin base lightly speckled with three to four irregular dark brown spots; pelvic fins and anal fin hyaline. Three rows of blackish spots on dorsal-fin rays, and two or three rows on caudal-fin rays; a relatively large black bar at caudal-fin base. Sides of head yellowish brown to black, with dark brown vermiculations visible.

Distribution and habitat.

Bashimyzon cheni is so far known from the Wuming-He, a stream tributary to the You-Jiang discharging into the Xi-Jiang of the Zhu-Jiang basin, in Guangxi Province, China (Fig. 9 View Figure 9 ). It was caught in shallow fast-flowing waters, at depths of 0.2-0.8 m, with a mixed bottom substrate of boulders, cobbles, and sands (Fig. 10 View Figure 10 ). Coexisting species included Opsariichthys bidens , Osteochilus salsburyi , Schistura fasciolata , Traccatichthys pulcher , Mystus guttatus , Glyptothorax fokiensis , and Mastacembelus armatus .

Etymology.

The specific epithet is named after Prof. Chen Yi-Yu, a Chinese Academician, in honor for his great contribution to Chinese freshwater fish research. In particular, he discovered and named the type species of Erromyzon and Yaoshania , which are two close relatives of the genus under description. The Chinese common specific name “陈氏岜是鳅” is here suggested.

Sequence variation and molecular phylogeny

A total of 158 COI gene sequences of 1167 bp (base pair) in length from all four species of Erromyzon , and two species of Bashimyzon were amplified in this study (Table 1 View Table 1 ). These sequences were used for molecular phylogenetic analysis together with three outgroups: Sinogastromyzon tonkinensis (one), Vanmanenia pingchowensis (one), and Yaoshania pachychilus (five). Twenty-seven haplotypes (22 and five, respectively for ingroups and outgroups) were detected from the sequences (Table 1 View Table 1 ). The haplotype sequences matrix consisted of 833 conserved sites, 334 variable sites, 259 parsimony informative sites and 75 singleton sites. The nucleotide frequencies were 25.2% (A), 29.4% (T), 25.8% (C), and 19.5% (G).

Given that BI and ML analyses produced overall identical topologies, only the BI tree with Bayesian posterior probabilities (PP) and bootstrap support (BS) value were presented in Fig. 11 View Figure 11 . From the tree topologies, samples of B. cheni were strongly supported (PP = 1.0 / BS = 100) to group into a lineage further forming a well-supported (PP = 1.0 / BS = 100) clade together with those of B. damingshanensis . Bashimyzon was weakly supported (PP = 0.57 / BS = 51) to stand as the sister group consisting of sampled species of Erromyzon ( E. sinensis , E. compactus , E. yangi and E. kalotaenia ). The two genera together were highly supported (PP = 1.0 / BS = 94) to be sister of Yaoshania .

The genetic distances (p-distances) within and between genera were provided in Table 4 View Table 4 . Intraspecific genetic distances were 0.03-0.26%, 0.0-0.01%, and 0.19% for sampled species of Erromyzon , Bashimyzon and Yaoshania , respectively. Interspecific genetic distances were 6-8% for Erromyzon , 3% for Bashimyzon and NA for Yaoshania (not available owing to the fact that it is a monotypic genus). The intergeneric genetic distances here calculated were 10-12% ( Bashimyzon / Erromyzon ), 10% ( Bashimyzon / Yaoshania ), and 11-12% ( Yaoshania / Erromyzon ), respectively.