Schistostoma indicum Shamshev, 2020
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.15298/rusentj.29.3.11 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/B76787A7-FFC9-FFD9-FE8D-44FBFB8F8D79 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Schistostoma indicum Shamshev |
status |
sp. nov. |
Schistostoma indicum Shamshev View in CoL , sp.n.
Figs 1–4 View Figs 1–4 .
TYPE MATERIAL. Holotype, ♂, “ INDIA, Uttarakhand, Rishikesh / 30.1333°N 78.317°E, forest stream/ K. Tomkovich 15, 17.iv.2012”; “ Schistostoma / indicum / Shamshev, sp. nov. ” ( ZMMU; terminalia dissected, in microvial pinned with specimen). GoogleMaps
DIAGNOSIS. Very small greyish flies (body about 1.5 mm); eyes with ommatrichia present, postpedicel onion-shaped; thorax with black setation, acrostichals biserial, dorsocentrals uniserial; mid tibia simple; abdominal sternites 3–5 bearing pair of long, stout blunt-tipped setae mounted on small tubercles.
DESCRIPTION. Male ( Fig. 1 View Figs 1–4 ). Body 1.6 mm, wing 1.7 mm. Head black. Eyes holoptic; upper ommatidia considerably enlarged, with rather scattered ommatrichia. Frons represented by very small, subtriangular, greyish space just above antennae. Face broad, greyish pruinose. Ocellar triangle with 2 pairs of fine setae (partly missing). Occiput brownish grey pruinose (in some views with some dark bluish tinge), with black setae; postoculars minute, almost bare on upper part, some short setae laterally and around mouth-opening. Antenna black; scape short, postpedicel with circlet of subapical setulae including 1 longer seta dorsally; postpedicel onion-shaped, slightly broader than high, pubescent with microtrichia; stylus long, 3.3X longer than postpedicel width. Proboscis short, directed forward. Palpus black, obscured by mouth-cavity, with black setae. Thorax black, densely brownish grey pruinose, black setose; mesoscutum strongly arched, more distinctly brownish pruinose (especially posteriorly) than mesopleuron, in anterodorsal view with two narrow weakly visible darker vittae between rows of acrostichals and dorsocentrals; prescutellar depression present. Prosternum separated. Proepisternum with 1 moderately long seta on upper part opposite anterior spiracle. Antepronotum with 1 setula on each side. Postpronotal lobe with 1 long seta. Mesonotum with 1 moderately long presutural intra-alar; 1 longer presutural supra-alar, 3 short postsutural supra-alars (close to suture, arranged in regular row), 3 notopleurals (situat- ed before suture; 2 lateral setae longer and stronger), 1 postalar, 4 almost equally long scutellars (inner pair slightly longer, cruciate); acrostichals arranged in 2 regular rows, very short, lacking on prescutellar depression; dorsocentrals uniserial, mostly subequal in length to acrostichals, two posterior pairs considerably longer (prescutellar pair longest). Spiracles brown. Mesopleuron bare.
Legs slender, almost uniformly brownish, coxae somewhat darker, “knees” paler; greyish pruinescent; with simple structure and vestiture, only hind tibia slightly evenly thickened toward apex and somewhat sinuate (posterior view). Podomeres with very inconspicuous black setation, mostly covered with rather sparse setulae; in addition, fore femur with some longer setae dorsally and near apex posteriorly, mid femur with similar setation but dorsal setae less distinct, hind femur with almost complete row of short setae dorsally (nearly half as long as femur width) and complete row of mostly short anteroventral setae (3–4 subapical setae longer).
Wing membrane uniformly faintly infuscate, with brownish normally sclerotised veins, covered with uniform microtrichia. Pterostigma absent. Longitudinal veins complete (except CuA+CuP evanescent). Costa circumambient; extreme anterior base with 2 strong setae; short setulae along anterior margin, distinct throughout, upper surface with distinct dorsal spinules. Sc distinct apically, reaching costa near middle of wing (or nearly opposite base of M 2). R 1 weakly sinuous, reaching costa far beyond middle of wing. Base of Rs originating opposite humeral crossvein. R 2+3 diverging from R 4+5 apically. R 4+5 weakly sinuous. R 4+5 and M 1, M 1 and M 2, M 2 and M 4 diverging beyond cell dm. Short r-m crossvein present in basal portion of wing, distal to base of R 4+5. Crossvein bm-m complete. Cell dm present, emitting three veins, closed by base of M 2 and crossvein dm-m, cell extended to middle of wing. Cells br, bm and cua in basal fourth of wing. Cells bm and cua broader than br. Cell cua closed, rounded apically with CuA curved. Anal lobe well-developed and right-angled, alula absent. Calypter brownish yellow, pale fringed. Halter with yellowish knob and brown stem.
Abdomen black, densely brownish grey pruinose (in some view tergites darker); tergites with rather sparse intermixed pale and black longer laterally (black setae more numerous distally); sternites with scattered short, fine, pale and dark setae (except noted), sternites 3–5 bearing pair of long, stout, blunt-tipped setae mounted on small tubercles, sternite 8 with several long posteromarginal setae.
Hypopygium ( Figs 2–4 View Figs 1–4 ) lateroflexed to right, inverted with posterior end directed anteriorly, small, asymmetrical. Cercus yellowish, short, bilobed, with several long setae apically. Epandrium with pair of symmetrical, slen- der, finger-like dorsal lobes (part of surstylus), bearing one short spine-like seta near mid-length and one short spine-like blunt-tipped subapical seta, mostly straight; right epandrial lamella oblong, left epandrial lamella subrectangular. Right ventral surstylus broadly expanded, subtriangular apically; left ventral surstylus with digitiform extension. Phallus sickle-shaped with somewhat hooked tip. Postgonites rounded apically. Hypandrium fused basally to each epandrial lamella; prolonged and distinctly tapered apically, bearing pair of long setae clos- er to base and pair of apical setae, less than one-third length of hypandrium.
Female. Unknown.
DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS. In having ommatrichia (pubescence eyes) and a shortened hypandrial lobe fused to the epandrium basally the new species should be compared with species of the Schistostoma albopilosum group [ Shamshev, Sinclair, 2006]. This group includes one species distributed broadly in the Mediterranean, i.e. S. albopilosum (Becker, 1910) , and three species known only from South Africa, i.e. S. brandbergensis Shamshev et Sinclair, 2006 ; S. kalgat Shamshev et Sinclair, 2006 and S. stuckenbergi Chvála, 1991 . Schistostoma indicum sp.n. differs from all these species primarily by unmodified mid tibiae and spine-like setae on abdominal sternites of the male. The female of the new species is unknown, however, once discovered it may likely differ from the females of the species of the S. albopilosum group by the onion-shaped postpedicel.
ETYMOLOGY. The specific epithet refers to the country of the origin of the new species.
1
DISTRIBUTION. Orient: India (Uttarakhand). According to the label data, the holotype was collected in the foothills of the Himalayas near a “forest stream” .
2
ZMMU |
Zoological Museum, Moscow Lomonosov State University |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |