Ummidia anaya, Godwin & Bond, 2021
publication ID |
https://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1027.54888 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:7D179ED7-D7A5-40A2-A972-E07BC648F3B9 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/851CAC8A-F15B-4DEF-BE0A-5B9A6248E754 |
taxon LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:act:851CAC8A-F15B-4DEF-BE0A-5B9A6248E754 |
treatment provided by |
|
scientific name |
Ummidia anaya |
status |
sp. nov. |
Ummidia anaya View in CoL sp. nov. Fig. 42 View Figure 42 , Map 5 View Map 5
Type material.
HOLOTYPE ♂ (CNAN-T01385) from Municipio de Santiago de Anaya Hidalgo, Grutas Xoxafi, Hidalgo, Mexico, 20.3884 -99.0275 1, 2020 m a.s.l., coll. 7-8.vi.2019, PE Cushing, E García, E González Santillán, DL Batista Perales, J Rojas Castillo, CNAN.
Etymology.
The specific epithet is a noun taken in apposition and is in reference to the type locality, the town of Santiago de Anaya.
Diagnosis.
Ummidia anaya can be differentiated from U. huascazaloya by lacking a defined comb on the retrolateral face of tarsus IV and by having a palpal tibia (1.85 × long as wide vs 3.25 ×) and tarsus IV (2.9 × long as wide vs 3.6 ×) which are less elongate as well as having more, smaller endite cuspules (22 vs 10). Males can be differentiated from U. cuicatec and U. zilchi by having a sinuous embolus without a strong bend and from U. cuicatec , U. zebrina , U. brandicarlileae , and U. yojoa by having relatively more spines on the prolateral face of tibia I (11 vs 0-2). Males can be differentiated from U. riverai by lacking a pale dorsal heart patch on the abdomen. Males disperse in June.
Description of male holotype.
Specimen preparation and condition. Specimen preserved in 80% EtOH. Cephalothorax. Carapace 5.88 long, 5.5 wide. Pars cephalica 3.75 long. Foveal groove procurved, 0.5 long, 1.13 wide. ME on moderate tubercle. AER procurved. PER straight. Eye group 0.66 long, 1.28 wide, AME 0.28, PME 0.18, ALE 0.36, PLE 0.2. Sternum moderately setose, STRl 3.4, STRw 3.1. Chelicerae with anterior tooth row comprising four teeth, posterior margin with four teeth. Palpal endites with 22 small, subhastate spinules over proximal half of endite face, lacking distal endite cuspules, ENDw 1.16, ENDl 2.16. Labium with seven small cuspules, LBw 1.12, LBl 0.88. Rastellum many spines on process. Abdomen setose with pale speckles. Legs. F1 5.5; F1w 1.44; P1 2.56; Ti1 3.13; Mt1 2.44; Tr1 1.25; F3 4.05; F3w 1.6; P3 2.09; Ti3 2.52; Sd3 1.52; Mt3 2.2; Tr3 1.4; F4 5.38; F4w 1.5; P4 2.31; Ti4 3.2; Mt4 3.45; Tr4 1.6. Retrolateral face of tarsus IV lacking distinct comb or brush, with two loose rows of spinules. Leg I spination pattern: TSp 7, TSpv 0, TSrd 0, TSr 0, TSrv 15, MtSp 0, MtSr 8, TrSp 0, TrSr 9. Pedipalps. PTl 1.96, PTw 1.06, Bl 2.81. Embolus long, sinuous, bulb relatively small.
Variation, males.
Known only from male type specimen.
Females.
Unknown.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |