Delphinium umbrosum Handel-Mazzetti (1931: 278)
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/phytotaxa.572.3.3 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7328075 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/BB6E6A41-FFF2-797D-FF12-F9512448FA73 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Delphinium umbrosum Handel-Mazzetti (1931: 278) |
status |
|
Delphinium umbrosum Handel-Mazzetti (1931: 278) View in CoL . Figs. 7–9 View FIGURE 7 View FIGURE 8 View FIGURE 9 .
Type:— CHINA. Yunnan: Ngukala between Zhongdian town and Djitsung (= Qizong) village in Weixi , in Abies forest, alt. 3750–3800 m, 25 August 1915, H. Handel-Mazzetti 7809 (holotype WU!). Fig. 7 View FIGURE 7 .
Description:—Perennial herbs. Rootstock thickened, woody. Stems erect, 30–110 cm tall, simple or branched, shortly retrorsely appressed strigose. Basal and proximal leaves withered by anthesis; cauline leaves long petiolate; petioles 8–20 cm long, sparsely retrorsely strigose, somewhat dilated at base; blades pentagonal-reniform, membranous, very sparsely strigose or subglabrous on both surfaces, 4–10 cm long, 5–12 cm broad, base cordate, 3-lobed to 5–10 mm from the base, central lobe rhombic or narrowly so, base cuneate, 3-lobulate, incised dentate, lateral lobes obliquely flabellate, often 2-lobulate; leaves gradually reduced upward, distal ones smaller, shortly petiolate. Inflorescence a terminal, simple or sometimes compound raceme, 10–30 cm long, 6–15-flowered, densely retrorsely strigose and yellowish glandular-puberulent; proximal bracts leaflike, distal ones small, linear; pedicels ascending or horizontal, densely retrorsely strigose and yellowish glandular-puberulent, 2–8 cm long; bracteoles distal, strigose, linear or linear-subulate, 0.8–1.9 cm long, 0.5–1.8 mm broad. Sepals blue-purple, abaxially puberulent; upper sepal obovate or broadly ovate, 8.5–15 mm long, ca. 8 mm broad, obtuse, spur subulate, 2–2.9 cm long, strongly recurved, base 2–3 mm in diameter, narrowed into a very slender tip; lateral and lower sepals obovate or broadly ovate, 8–16 mm long, ca. 8 mm broad, apex rounded-truncate. Petals bluish; lamina entire, obtuse at apex, glabrous, spur very slender, 2–2.9 mm long. Staminodes bluish, 2-lobed; lobes lanceolate-triangular, 3–6 mm long, white barbate; claws 3–8 mm long. Stamens glabrous. Carpels 3; ovaries sparsely puberulent. Follicles subglabrous.
Distribution and habitat:— Delphinium umbrosum is distributed in northwestern Yunnan (Dali, Deqen, Eryuan, Fugong, Weixi, Zhongdian), China ( Fig. 6 View FIGURE 6 ). It grows in grassy places or thickets at margin of forests or along stream sides at altitudes of 2750–3900 m.
Phenology:—Flowering from August to September; fruiting from September to October.
Additional specimens examined:— CHINA. Yunnan: Dali, Q.E. Yang 9419 (PE00500052, PE00500053); Deqen, C.W. Wang 69050 (PE00500056, PE00500057), C.W. Wang 69052 (LBG00051744, KUN0686098, NAS00184160, PE00500058, PE00500059, WUK); Eryuan, J.M. Delavay 4109 (P00197190, P00197191, P00197192, PE00476715); Fugong, Q. Lin 791959 (KUN0686096, KUN0686097); Weixi, R.C. Ching 22022 (KUN0685180, PE0685181), H.T. Tsai 57615 (KUN0685728, LBG00051758, PE00476713), H.T. Tsai 59689 (KUN0685258, KUN0685260, LBG00051764, NAS00183753, PE00500051), H.T. Tsai 59749 (KUN0685259, KUN0685261, LBG00051757, NAS00183752, PE00500050), H.T. Tsai 59814 (KUN0685262, LBG 00051763, NAS00183751, PE00476707); Zhongdian, Zhongdian Exped. 1426 (HITBC-herbarium no. 074577, KUN0686093, KUN0686094), Z.D. Fang 0996 (SABG004066).
Notes:— Handel-Mazzetti (1931) described Delphinium umbrosum on the basis of a single collection, HandelMazzetti 7809 (WU; Fig. 7 View FIGURE 7 ), from Zhongdian county in northwestern Yunnan, China. In the protologue, the author stated that this species was related to D. delavayi Franchet (1886: 379) , but the latter species differed by having thicker leaves, lanceolate and sessile bracts, much less reflexed spur, much more obliquely truncate upper petals, densely ciliate lateral petals, and very pilose ovaries (“Affine D. Delavayi Franch. quod differt foliis crassioribus, bracteis lanceolatis sessilibus, calcare multo minus reflexo, petalis superioribus multo obliquius truncates, lateralibus crebre ciliatis, ovaries valde pilosis”). Since its description, D. umbrosum has been recognized as an independent species by Wang (1962, 1979 a, 1993, 1997, 2000, 2020), Munz (1968), and Wang & Warnock (2001).
Wang (1962) referred ten collections to Delphinium umbrosum , including C.W. Wang 69050 (PE), C.W. Wang 69052 (PE) from Deqen county in northwestern Yunnan and T.T. Yu 979 (PE), J.Q. Hu et al. 3824 (PE), J.Q. Hu et al. 3859 (PE) all from Yuexi county, J.Q. Hu et al. 1132 (PE), J.Q. Hu et al. 1554 (PE), J.Q. Hu et al. 1607 (PE), J.Q. Hu et al. 4248 (PE) all from Hongxi county (now Meigu county ), and T.T. Yu 3417 (PE) from Leibo county all in southwestern Sichuan. Wang (1965) considered that only the two Yunnan collections ( Fig. 8 View FIGURE 8 ) belonged to D. umbrosum . He thus described a new variety, D. umbrosum var. hispidum , to accommodate the Sichuan collections, with J.Q. Hu et al. 1607 (PE; Fig. 12A View FIGURE 12 ) designated as holotype. He stated that the new variety differed from the type variety, var. umbrosum , by having stem proximally spreading hispid (vs. retrorsely puberulent) and thinner (vs. thicker) (2‒3.5 mm vs. 5‒10 mm in diameter). This treatment was accepted by Wang (1979a, 2020) and Wang & Warnock (2001).
We have examined all the type material of Delphinium umbrosum var. hispidum and determined that this variety is identical with D. omeiense , a species described on the basis of six collections also from southwestern Sichuan and since its description generally recognized by Wang (1979 a, 1984, 2000, 2016, 2020), Wang & Wang (2000), Wang & Warnock (2001), and Xie (2016). In fact, the four sheets of Sichuan Econ. Pl. Exped. 1607 (PE; Fig. 12A–D View FIGURE 12 ), which constitute the type collection of D. umbrosum var. hispidum , belong also to a paratype collection of D. omeiense ( Wang 1979b; Fig. 12B View FIGURE 12 ), because J.Q. Hu et al. 1607 and Sichuan Econ. Pl. Exped. 1607 are actually the same collection, with Hu as the leading participant of the expedition ( Fig. 12C View FIGURE 12 ). Our critical examination indicates that this collection is not mixed, comprising only one taxon. We will deal with D. omeiense in detail elsewhere; in addition to D. umbrosum var. hispidum , several other names should also be reduced to the synonymy of this species.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |