Euplotes octocarinatus Carter, 1972
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.12651/JSR.2023.12.3.203 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.13139746 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/BC7687FC-1700-812B-178E-FC4BFC74FB22 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Euplotes octocarinatus Carter, 1972 |
status |
|
3. Euplotes octocarinatus Carter, 1972 View in CoL View at ENA ( Fig. 3 View Fig )
Material examined. Freshwater collected from ecological reservoir, Gyeongpo-dong , Gangneung-si, Gangwondo, Korea (37°46′57″N, 128°52′60″E) on July 23, 2020 GoogleMaps .
Diagnosis. Body size 60.3-79.3 × 32.0-49.9 μm (on average 66.5 × 46.4 μm) after protargol impregnation, shape oval to ellipsoidal, 6 dorsal and 3 ventral ridges; one macronucleus C-shaped with a single small spherical micronucleus attached; 33-36 adoral membranelles; 9 frontoventral, 5 transverse, 2 caudal and 2 marginal cirri; invariably 8 dorsal kineties, of which the middle kinety composed of about 14-19 dikinetids; dorsal argyrome pattern in double- patella type.
Distribution. Worldwide ( Carter, 1972; Méndez-Sánchez et al., 2020).
Remarks. The characteristics of the Korean population correspond well with the type ( Carter, 1972) and Mexican populations ( Méndez-Sánchez et al., 2020).
Some species with silverline system of double- patella type in Euplotes (i.e., E. apsheronicus Agamaliev, 1966 , E. patella ( Müller, 1773) Ehrenberg, 1838 , E. zenkewitchi Curds, 1975 and E. elegans Kahl, 1932 ) also resemble E. octocarinatus . However, E. apsheronicus differs from E. octocarinatus in the number of dorsal kineties (9 vs. 8) and the habitat (marine vs. freshwater) ( Curds, 1975). Euplotes patella can be distinguished from E. octocarinatus by the body size (90-120 × 55-75 vs. 60-79 × 32-50) and the number of dorsal kineties (9 vs. 8) ( Foissner et al., 1991). Euplotes zenkewitchi differs from E. octocarinatus in the body size (80 × 50 vs. 60-79 × 32-50), the number of adoral membranelles (50-55 vs. 33-36), the number of dorsal kineties (10 vs. 8), and the habitat (marine vs. freshwater) ( Curds, 1975). Euplotes elegans differs from E. octocarinatus in the body size (65-118 × 33-63 vs. 60-79 × 30-50), the number of adoral membranelles (47- 64 vs. 33-36), the number of dorsal kineties (9-10 vs. 8), and the habitat (marine vs. freshwater) ( Schwarz et al., 2007).
Voucher slides. One slide with protargol-impregnated specimens (NNIBRPR25659) and one slide with wet silver nitrate-impregnated specimens (NNIBRPR25660) were deposited at the Nakdonggang National Institute of Biological Resources.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |