Racodiscula sceptrellifera var. spiroglyphi Annandale, 1911

Van Soest, Rob W. M., 2024, Correcting sponge names: nomenclatural update of lower taxa level Porifera, Zootaxa 5398 (1), pp. 1-122 : 60

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5398.1.1

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:E233F731-D5FA-4032-B3A4-CEFE5A809C49

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.10567924

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/BF4E397F-FFDC-3168-9786-FE02BE720129

treatment provided by

Plazi

scientific name

Racodiscula sceptrellifera var. spiroglyphi Annandale, 1911
status

 

Racodiscula sceptrellifera var. spiroglyphi Annandale, 1911 View in CoL

( Figs. 6 View FIGURE 6 I-J)

Racodiscula sceptrellifera var. spiroglyphi Annandale, 1911b: 52 View in CoL , pl. VIII fig. 2, pl. IX figs. 1–15; Pattanayak 2009: 12, pl. VI fig. F.

The variety was described in the same paper and from the same locality as the previous variety, and it was collected likewise during the same cruise of the trawler ‘Golden Crown’. The dried type specimen growing on a vermetid shell of the genus Spiroglyphus is kept in the collections of the Zoological Survey of India, ZSI, Kolkata, ZEV4651 ( Pattanayak 2009: 12). The typical variety was described by Carter (1881: 372 from the Gulf of Mannaar, approximate coordinates 9.13°N 79.14°E, type material from the Liverpool Museum was destroyed during WWII, but there are slides in the Natural History Museum labeled with the name Discodermia sceptrellifera View in CoL ). Additional records are from the Madras region ( Burton & Rao 1932: 307) and from the Seychelles ( Thomas 1981: 40, pl. II fig. 26). The present variety differs from the typical variety according to Annandale in the color (deep orange to bright red vs. yellow), the absence of ectosomal discotriaenes and the presence of bundles of slim rhabds. The color difference is trivial as Carter had only preserved (dried) material, Carter’s ectosomal discotriaenes graded into phyllotriaenelike ectosomal spicules similar to those of Annandale. Thus, only the presence of bundles of monaxone (oxeote or stylote) megascleres appears to be different between the two. Such bundles are found in the (neo) type of Racodiscula asteroides Zittel, 1878 View in CoL and other Racodiscula species, (cf. Schuster et al. 2018: 14–24). Subsequent descriptions of Discodermia sceptrellifera View in CoL by Burton & Rao (1932), Thomas (1981), and Thomas (1985: 345, pl. VIII fig. 8) do not mention the presence of these spicule bundles. Burton & Rao’s report concerned the same material as Annandale’s as they mention the same locality (Ganjam) and the ‘Golden Crown’ collection for their specimens. These authors only used the name Discodermia sceptrellifera View in CoL , did not refer to Annandale or the varieties described by him, nor did they mention bundles of monaxons. Thus, it is likely that type material of either the present variety or Racodiscula sceptrellifera var. siliquariae Annandale, 1911b View in CoL (see above) is also kept in the Natural History Museum as BMNH 1931.1.1.15.

Although the difference between the present variety and the typical variety may be a case of collectively overlooking the monaxons by several authors, it is prudent to keep the the taxa as distinct in case the difference is genuine. In view of the semi-sympatric occurrence (Gulf of Mannar, Madras region, Seychelles) I propose to elevate the rank of the present variety for the time being to species level as Racodiscula spiroglyphi Annandale, 1911b , based on page priority, being the first mentioned variety.

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Porifera

Class

Demospongiae

Order

Tetractinellida

Family

Theonellidae

Genus

Racodiscula

Loc

Racodiscula sceptrellifera var. spiroglyphi Annandale, 1911

Van Soest, Rob W. M. 2024
2024
Loc

Racodiscula sceptrellifera var. spiroglyphi

Pattanayak, J. G. 2009: 12
Annandale, N. 1911: 52
1911
GBIF Dataset (for parent article) Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF