Aphanogmus campanula, Salden & Peters, 2023

Salden, Tobias & Peters, Ralph S., 2023, Afrotropical Ceraphronoidea (Insecta: Hymenoptera) put back on the map with the description of 88 new species, European Journal of Taxonomy 884 (1), pp. 1-386 : 132-135

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.5852/ejt.2023.884.2181

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:A128228C-185E-4D21-B23B-223C7C737C4C

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8193712

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/15ED567C-8051-4F0B-910C-3D38B6D604B0

taxon LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:act:15ED567C-8051-4F0B-910C-3D38B6D604B0

treatment provided by

Felipe

scientific name

Aphanogmus campanula
status

sp. nov.

Aphanogmus campanula sp. nov.

urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:15ED567C-8051-4F0B-910C-3D38B6D604B0

Fig. 36 View Fig

Diagnosis

Preoccipital furrow present, with small interocellar pit;posterior mesosomal comb present.Male genitalia: harpes taken together bell-shaped in ventral and dorsal view; harpe/gvc index 0.41; ventromedial margins of harpes not touching at distoventral margin of gvc, ventromedial margin of harpe convex in basal half, concave in apical half and converging and touching distomedially; ventral margin of harpe convex, dorsal margin straight with indentation between basal and apical half, lateral margin straight and curved at its middle in basal third, convex and oriented distomedially in apical two thirds.

Etymology

The species name is derived from the Latin word ‘ campanula ’ which means ‘bell’, with reference to the bell-shaped harpes of the male genitalia.

Material examined

Holotype

TANZANIA • ♂; Kilimanjaro Region, Mount Kilimanjaro; 3°13′42.2 S, 37°31′11.1 E; 2040 m a.s.l.; 21 Jan. 2012; KiLi project leg.; “tree 1”; FLM5, forest lower mont.; Coloured pan trap; ZFMK; ZFMK- HYM-00037057 . GoogleMaps

Description

Male

BODY LENGTH. 0.92 mm.

COLOUR. Head brown, mesosoma brown, metasoma light brown; scape, pedicel and flagellum light brown, gradually darkening from F1 to F9; legs light brown except joints and tarsi lighter; fore wing venation light brown, distal end of marginal vein and pterostigma marginal vein distinctly darker, fore and hind wing disc slightly melanized, fore wing at proximal part less melanized.

ANTENNA. 11-segmented, flagellomeres trapezoidal; scape 3.7× as long as pedicel, scape longer than F1 and F2 combined, F1 3.0× as long as wide, F1 1.7 × as long as pedicel, F1 1.2 × as long as F2, F1 shorter than F7 and F8 combined, F1 shorter than F9, F6 2.0× as long as wide, F6 shorter than F7 and F8 combined, F6 1.3× as high as F9; numerous distinctly small multiporous plates on flagellomeres, sensillae on flagellomeres erect and longer than width of flagellomeres.

HEAD. Head width 1.33 × head height; head width 1.70 × interorbital space; maximum eye diameter 1.05 × minimum eye diameter; head height 1.60 × maximum eye diameter. Dorsal margin of occipital carina ventral to dorsal margin of lateral ocellus in lateral view; preoccipital furrow present, with small interocellar pit; preoccipital carina present. OOL:POL:LOL 1.00:1.00:0.71; OOL 1.75 × lateral ocellus diameter. White, thick setae on upper face absent; supraclypeal depression present; lateral margin of torulus raised; intertorular carina present; posterolateral processes of gena absent.

MESOSOMA, METASOMA. Mesosoma compressed laterally. Head width 1.21 × mesosoma width; Weber length 269 µm. Mesoscutum densely setose, setae curved backwards; median mesoscutal sulcus absent; interaxillar sulcus superficial, scutoscutellar sulcus not adjacent to transscutal articulation, scutoscutellar sulcus concave; dorsal axillar area setose, setae curved backwards; mesoscutellum setose, setae curved backwards or straight. Mesoscutum width 2.20 × mesoscutellum width; posterior mesoscutal width 1.67 × mesoscutellum width; mesoscutellum length 1.87 × mesoscutellum width; mesoscutellum length 1.12 × posterior mesoscutal width; Weber length 1.30 × mesoscutum width; Weber length 1.54 × mesoscutellum length. Anteromedian projection of the metanoto-propodeo-metapecto-mesopectal complex straight in lateral view with pointed and lighter end, exceeding end of mesosoma; mesometapleural sulcus absent; posterior propodeal projection distinctly short and light; posterior mesosomal comb present. Basal transverse carina of petiole (on syntergum) present; at least seven, short, basal longitudinal carinae on syntergum; translucent patches on metasoma absent.

FORE WING. Length 2.83 × width; stigmal vein slightly longer than pterostigma marginal length.

MALE GENITALIA. Genital length 125 µm; Weber length 2.15 × genital length; gvc width 69 µm; genital length 1.82× gvc width; gvc width more than three quarters of gvc length; gvc width 1.23 × distal gvc width. Proximodorsal margin of gvc straight; distodorsal margin of gvc descending proximomedially ( Fig. 36C View Fig ); proximoventral margin of gvc slightly concave; distoventral margin of gvc descending proximomedially ( Fig. 36A View Fig ); ventral area of gvc slightly convex; dorsal area of gvc convex ( Fig. 36B View Fig ); proximolateral margin of gvc ascending ventrally; distolateral margin of gvc convex, more strongly descending dorsally ( Fig. 36B View Fig ). Harpes taken together bell-shaped in ventral and dorsal view; harpe/gvc index 0.41; lateral articulation site of harpe with gvc virtually flush ( Fig. 36A, C View Fig ); ventral margin of harpe convex, dorsal margin straight with indentation between basal and apical half ( Fig. 36B View Fig ), lateral margin straight and curved at its middle in basal third, convex and oriented distomedially in apical two thirds, widest point of harpe at lateral articulation site with gvc ( Fig. 36A, C View Fig ); ventromedial margins of harpes not touching at distoventral margin of gvc, ventromedial margin of harpe convex in basal half, concave in apical half and converging and touching distomedially ( Fig. 36C View Fig ), apex of harpe rounded, oriented distomedially ( Fig. 36A, C View Fig ). Harpe with at least one lateral seta restricted to basal third, longest lateral seta more than half as long as harpe, lateral seta oriented distodorsally and distolaterally; harpe with at least two apical setae, longest apical setae less than one quarter as long as harpe, apical setae oriented distodorsally and distolaterally; harpe with at least two median setae restricted to apical half, longest median setae one quarter as long as harpe, median setae oriented distodorsally. Aedeagus + gonossiculus indistinct. Aedeagus + gonossiculus with at least two digital teeth, oriented ventrally. Genitalia weakly sclerotized with strongest sclerotization at aedeagus + gonossiculus and harpe.

Female

Unknown.

Variation

Unknown.

Biology

Host unknown, specimen collected with coloured pan trap.

Distribution

Afrotropical: Tanzania.

Remarks

Comparison with similar species

Aphanogmus campanula sp. nov. and A. pagoda sp. nov. are very similar in having a small interocellar pit, a posterior mesosomal comb and similar stigmal vein to pterostigma marginal length ratios. However, in A. campanula the scape is longer than F1 and F2 combined (scape as long as F1 and F2 combined in A. pagoda ), and the harpe/gvc index is higher (0.41 in A. campanula , 0.27 in A. pagoda ), In addition, the two species differ in the shapes of the ventral, dorsal and lateral margins of the harpes.

Condition of type material

In the holotype, the right F6 to F9, and the left mesotarsus are missing. The left middle leg (except coxa) and the left fore and hind wing are detached. The metasoma is slightly deformed and the posterior third of the metasoma is missing, thus the body length measurement is not precise.

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Insecta

Order

Hymenoptera

SubOrder

Apocrita

SuperFamily

Ceraphronoidea

Family

Ceraphronidae

Genus

Aphanogmus

GBIF Dataset (for parent article) Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF