Orientocardiochiles joeburrowi Kang, 2020
|
publication ID |
https://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.971.56571 |
|
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:8996028A-43C1-4B47-A4A5-CBAD2A39EBE3 |
|
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/C653D411-AED6-45FA-8BE7-254DBDA02BD9 |
|
taxon LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:act:C653D411-AED6-45FA-8BE7-254DBDA02BD9 |
|
treatment provided by |
|
|
scientific name |
Orientocardiochiles joeburrowi Kang |
| status |
sp. nov. |
Orientocardiochiles joeburrowi Kang sp. nov. Fig. 2A-G View Figure 2
Material examined.
Holotype Malaysia • ♀; female, Perlis, Wang Kelian; 6°40'40.94"N, 100°11'23.94"E; xi.2008; Sharkey & Norliyana.
Description.
Body large and stout, 9.1mm. Antenna 6.4 mm. Length of forewing 9.6 mm. Ovipositor sheath 4.4 mm. Head. Antenna 41-segmented; length of scape 1.3 × longer than its width (30:23); third segment (basal flagellomere) 2.2 × longer than second segment (pedicel) (29:13); apical segment 1.9 × longer than subapical segment (15:8). Clypeal suture distinct (Fig. 2F View Figure 2 ); with two well-developed tubercles; width of clypeus 1.9 × its height (72:44); face width 0.9 × length of face and clypeus combined (11:12); distance between tentorial pits 1.9 × distance between a pit and eye margin (60:32). Mandible bidentate; basal width of mandible 0.7 × longer than the distance from mandible to eye margin (22:31). Maxillary palpus 5-segmented. Labial palpus 4-segmented. Galea short with dense setae (Fig. 2F View Figure 2 ). Glossa short (Fig. 2F View Figure 2 ). Head transverse, median length 0.35 × longer than the maximum width of head in dorsal view (75:217). Eye length 2.0 × length of temple as viewed dorsally (72:36). Ocellar triangle marginated with shallow suture; POL:OD:OOL= 10:18:42. Mesosoma. Length of mesosoma 1.4 × its height (37:26). Notauli present (Figs 2B, E View Figure 2 ). Mesoscutum with shallow submarginal furrows (Fig. 2E View Figure 2 ). Scutellar sulcus curved with 5 crenulae, 0.33 × longer than median length of scutellum (19:57) (Fig. 2E View Figure 2 ). Postscutellar depression absent. Propodeum rugulose; propodeal areola kite-shaped, length of median areola 1.8 × longer than its maximum width (60:34); median transverse carina on the propodeum reaching lateral margin (Fig. 2D View Figure 2 ). Pronotum mostly smooth and carinate posteriorly. Mesopleuron mostly smooth; precoxal sulcus well-defined and crenulate, not reaching posterior margin. Metapleuron rugulose. Mesosternal sulcus with few barely perceptible crenulae. Legs. Fore tibial spur 0.57 × basitarsus (44:77). Length of hind femur, tibia and basitarsus 3.8 × (210:55), 7.1 × (320:45) and 6.0 × (18:3) longer than maximum width of each. Basal spur of mid tibia 0.58 × longer than length of mid-basitarsus (67:115). Basal spur of hind tibia 1.8 × longer than length of apical spur (88:49), and 0.49 × longer than length of hind basitarsus (88:178). Hind basitarsus 0.56 × longer than length of hind tibia (18:32), and 0.96 × longer than length of remaining hind tarsi 2-5 (178:185). Hind tarsal claws pectinate with 10 teeth (Fig. 2G View Figure 2 ). Wings. Length of forewing 3.2 × longer than its maximum width (96:32). Length of pterostigma 4.4 × longer than its width (191:44). Forewing r:3-SR:2-SR= 33:165:99; 1-M 2.4 × longer than m-cu (88:36); 2-SR+M 1.63 × longer than m-cu (59:36); 1-CU1 0.23 × longer than 2-CU1 (22:96) and 0.37 × longer than cu-a (22:59). Length of hind wing 5.2 × longer than its maximum width (78:15); second submarginal cell trapezoid, maximum length of the cell 3.15 × longer than its maximum height (262:83) (Fig. 2A View Figure 2 ). Hind wing M+CU distinctly shorter than 1-M, and 0.63 × longer than 1-M (75:119); 1-M 3.6 × longer than length of 1r-m (119:33); 2-SC+R horizontal to the longitudinal axis of hind wing; 2-1A absent. Metasoma. T1 punctate medially, about 1.1 × longer than its apical width (133:125). (Fig. 2D View Figure 2 ). T2 dorsally rectangular; median length of T2 0.34 × longer than its apical width (50:146), and 0.74 × as long as median length of T3 (50:67) (Figs 2B, D View Figure 2 ). T3 entirely smooth (Fig. 2D View Figure 2 ). Hypopygium acute apically, fully sclerotized without median suture (Fig. 2A, C View Figure 2 ). Ovipositor length about 1.23 × longer than length of metasoma (57:46). Ovipositor sheaths densely setose throughout; setose part of ovipositor sheath 0.95 × longer than length of metasoma (44:46), 1.38 × longer than length of hind tibia (44:32), and 0.46 × longer than length of forewing (44:96).
Color. Body mostly whitish pale and appearing striped; the following areas melanic: antenna, vertex, median mesonotal lobe (mostly melanic except for posterior area), lateral mesonotal lobe (pale basally), scutellum, anterior propodeum, fore trochantellus, basal fore femur, mid trochanter (mostly) and trochantellus, hind coxa with a large melanic spot posterolaterally, entire hind trochanter and trochantellus, hind femur (except for anteromedial area), mid and hind tarsi, median tergum 1, entire tergum 2, anterior terga 3-6, posterior tergum 7, ovipositor and external ovipositor sheaths. Wings entirely lightly infuscate, stigma dark brown but centrally pale.
Male. Unknown.
Etymology.
Named in honor of Joseph Lee Burrow, the world-class college football quarterback for the LSU Tigers and the 2019 Heisman Trophy winner.
Host(s).
Unknown.
Distribution.
Orientocardiochiles joeburrowi sp. nov., is known from only one female specimen collected from Wang Kelian, Malaysia, which is near the Thailand-Malaysia border (Fig. 4A, B View Figure 4 ).
Notes.
Orientocardiochiles joeburrowi sp. nov., can be distinguished from O. nigrofasciatus sp. nov. due to the following diagnostic characters of the genus: i) forewing entirely lightly infuscate; ii) propodeum without short longitudinal carina anteriorly; iii) propodeal areola quadrate (kite-shaped); iv) hind tarsal claw pectinate with 10 teeth; v) hypopygium entirely sclerotized and without median enfold; vi) scapus entirely brown.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.