Triplectides
|
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.182902 |
|
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6229220 |
|
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/C85D0A34-215E-757A-FF7A-B10CFA4BFEF5 |
|
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
|
scientific name |
Triplectides |
| status |
|
Key to male Triplectides View in CoL of New Caledonia
1 Spurs 2:2:4...................................................................................................................................................2
- Spurs 2:2:2 ................................................................................................................................................. 7
2 Hind wing F1 absent ( Fig. 58 View FIGURES 57 – 64 ) .................................................................................. nathaliae , new species
- Hind wing F1 present ( Fig. 74 View FIGURES 73 – 80 )....................................................................................................................3
3 In genitalia, mesal lobe of the inferior appendages apically truncate ( Fig. 54 View FIGURES 49 – 56 )..........................................4
- I n genitalia, mesal lobe of the inferior appendages more or less produced apicad ( Fig. 86 View FIGURES 81 – 88 )........................5
4 In genitalia, lateral corner of mesal lobe of the inferior appendages only slightly produced laterad ( Fig. 70 View FIGURES 65 – 72 ). Tergum X apically rectangular with wide mesal incision ( Fig. 70 View FIGURES 65 – 72 ) ................ mariannae , new species
- In genitalia, lateral corner of mesal lobe of the inferior appendages strongly produced laterad ( Fig. 54 View FIGURES 49 – 56 ). Tergum X apically rounded, with mesal slit ( Fig. 54 View FIGURES 49 – 56 ) ................................................... wardi , new species
5 I n genitalia, mesal lobe of the inferior appendages with long apical projection ( Fig. 78 View FIGURES 73 – 80 ). Tergum X dorsal part narrowing apically ( Fig. 77 View FIGURES 73 – 80 ). Apicodorsal lobe of the inferior appendages not exceeding harpagones in length ( Fig. 76 View FIGURES 73 – 80 ) ........................................................................................................ dawnae , new species
- In genitalia, mesal lobe of the inferior appendages with short apical projection ( Fig. 86 View FIGURES 81 – 88 ). Tergum X dorsal part shelf-like ( Fig. 85 View FIGURES 81 – 88 ). Apicodorsal lobe of the inferior appendages exceeding harpagones in length ( Fig. 84 View FIGURES 81 – 88 )............................................................................................................................................................... 6
6 Foreleg anterior claw enlarged and posterior claw reduced ( Mary & Ward 2001: fig. 2). Tergum X ventral part noticeably shorter than dorsal part, with wide mesal notch ( Mary & Ward 2001: fig. 9) ..................... ........................................................................................................................... smithi Mary & Ward, 2001
- Foreleg claws unmodified. Tergum X ventral part about as long as dorsal part or longer, with narrow mesal notch ( Figs 84–86 View FIGURES 81 – 88 ) .............................................................................. aequalichelatus , new species
7 In genitalia, tergum X narrowing apically ( Fig. 46 View FIGURES 41 – 48 ). Basoventral process of the inferior appendages reaching as far as, or longer, than mesal lobes ( Fig. 46 View FIGURES 41 – 48 ) ..................................................................................... 8
- In genitalia, tergum X apically widening, or straight ( Figs 6 View FIGURES 1 – 8 , 22 View FIGURES 17 – 24 ). Basoventral process of the inferior appendages reaching as far as, or shorter, than mesal lobes ( Figs 6 View FIGURES 1 – 8 , 22 View FIGURES 17 – 24 ) .................................................. 9
8 Forewing longer than 10 mm. S4 meets M more than its own length beyond crossvein m-cu ( Mary & Ward 2001: fig. 1). Apicodorsal lobe of the inferior appendages almost two times longer than harpagones ( Mary & Ward 2001: fig. 9). Mesal lobes with 4 setae in apical row................ sasali Mary & Ward, 2001
- Forewing shorter than 10 mm. S4 meets M shorter than its own length beyond crossvein m-cu ( Figs 41, 43 View FIGURES 41 – 48 ). Apicodorsal lobe of the inferior appendages slightly exceeding harpagones in length ( Figs 44, 46 View FIGURES 41 – 48 ). Mesal lobes with 2 or fewer setae at apex ( Fig. 46 View FIGURES 41 – 48 ) .............................................. koghiensis , new species
9 Hing wing fork 1 present ( Morse & Neboiss 1982: fig. 1). Mesal lobe of the inferior appendages rounded ( Morse & Neboiss 1982: fig. 54b) .............................................................................. australis Navás, 1934 View in CoL
- Hind wing fork 1 absent. Mesal lobe of the inferior appendages rectangular ( Figs 6 View FIGURES 1 – 8 , 22 View FIGURES 17 – 24 ).......................10
10 Forewing length around 13 mm. Basoventral process of the inferior appendages reaching about as far as mesal lobes ( Mary & Ward 2001: fig. 12) ............................................... winstanleyi Mary & Ward, 2001
- Forewing length less than 10 mm. Basoventral process of the inferior appendages reaching as far as mesal lobes or shorter ( Figs 22 View FIGURES 17 – 24 , 38 View FIGURES 33 – 40 )....................................................................................................................11
11 In genitalia, basoventral process of the inferior appendages prominent, directed posterolaterad ( Figs 6 View FIGURES 1 – 8 , 22 View FIGURES 17 – 24 ). Forewings with dark areas at anastomosis ( Figs 2 View FIGURES 1 – 8 , 18 View FIGURES 17 – 24 )..................................................................... 12
- In genitalia, basoventral process of the inferior appendages small, directed laterad ( Fig. 38 View FIGURES 33 – 40 ). Forewings with bands ( Fig. 33 View FIGURES 33 – 40 )...................................................................................................................................14
12 Hind wing discoidal cell absent ( Fig. 10 View FIGURES 9 – 16 ) ........................................................... abnormalis , new species
- Hind wing discoidal cell present ( Fig. 2 View FIGURES 1 – 8 )...................................................................................................13
13 In genitalia, mesal lobe of the inferior appendages narrow ( Fig. 22 View FIGURES 17 – 24 ). Apicodorsal lobe of the inferior appendages almost 2 times longer than harpagones ( Figs 20, 22 View FIGURES 17 – 24 ). Ventral carinae on tergum X small ( Fig. 20 View FIGURES 17 – 24 ) .............................................................................................................................. minutus , new species
- In genitalia, mesal lobe of the inferior appendages broad ( Fig. 6 View FIGURES 1 – 8 ). Apicodorsal lobe of the inferior appendages slightly exceeding harpagones in length ( Figs 4, 6 View FIGURES 1 – 8 ). Ventral carinae on tergum X prominent ( Fig. 4 View FIGURES 1 – 8 ) ................................................................................................................................ mouiensis , new species
14 In genitalia, tergum X with rounded apicolateral corners ( Fig. 30 View FIGURES 25 – 32 ). Mesal lobe of the inferior appendages with mesal part produced apicad, folded dorsally; lateral corners prominently produced ( Fig. 30 View FIGURES 25 – 32 )............. ............................................................................................................................. noumeiensis , new species
- In genitalia, tergum X with quadrangular apicolateral corners ( Fig. 38 View FIGURES 33 – 40 ). Mesal lobe of the inferior appendages apically flat, rugose; lateral corners slightly produced ( Fig. 38 View FIGURES 33 – 40 ) ....................... tigrinus , new species
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.