Hygrobates (Lurchibates), 2011

Goldschmidt, Tom, Nishikawa, Kanto, Hiruta, Shimpei F., Pfingstl, Tobias, Jiang, Jian-Ping & Shimano, Satoshi, 2021, Systematics, distribution and morphology of the newt parasitic water mites of the subgenus Lurchibates Goldschmidt & Fu, 2011 (Acari, Hydrachnidia Hygrobatidae, Hygrobates Koch, 1837), including the description of four new species and a key to all so far known species, Zootaxa 4985 (1), pp. 1-36 : 21-25

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4985.1.1

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:4EAFC76B-D4E4-4D96-8D0D-1B24E44975C7

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5217302

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/CA5B87C3-3435-5F4E-FF36-FBB4FA32CBA1

treatment provided by

Plazi

scientific name

Hygrobates (Lurchibates)
status

 

Key to all so far known species of Hygrobates (Lurchibates)

1 P-5 without basal cone; P-2, P-3 ventro-distally without denticles ( Fig. 58 View FIGURES 58, 59 ); male genital field compact, round ( Fig. 59 View FIGURES 58, 59 )............................................................................................ ancistrophorus 1* P-5 with basal cone; P-2 and/or P-3 ventro-distally with few to many denticles; male genital field broad-oval, dumbbell or apple-shaped......................................................................................... 2

2 Palp, especially P-4 very short, compact (palp total L 300; P-4 L 96, L/H 2.1); basal cone at P-5 rounded ( Fig. 60 View FIGURES 60–62 ); chelicera with short basal segment (basal L/claw L 1.1) ( Fig. 61 View FIGURES 60–62 ); anterior coxal group very broad, compact (Cx-I/II L/ W 0.60) ( Fig. 62 View FIGURES 60–62 )............................................................................. salamandrarum (only female)

2* Palp longer (palp total L 376–658), P-4 longer, more slender (P-4 L 118–230, L/H 2.3–3.3); basal cone at P-5 cone-shaped to pointed; basal segment of chelicera relatively longer (basal L/claw L 1.2–1.6); anterior coxal group broad to slender (Cx-I/II L/ W 0.62 –0.81)....................................................................................... 3

3 Anterior coxae very slender, Cx-I basally very narrow (Cx-I L/basal W 3.0) ( Fig. 63 View FIGURES 63, 64 ); palp slender, especially P-3 (L/H 1.8) ( Fig. 64 View FIGURES 63, 64 )........................................ fragmentarius sp. nov. (only known in one fragmented specimen)

3* anterior coxae more compact, Cx-I basally relatively broad (Cx-I L/basal W 1.5 –2.8), in most species clearly broader; palp compact to slender, P-3 shorter (L/H 0.9–1.4)............................................................... 4

4 palp, especially P-4 rather compact (P-4 L/H 2.3–2.7, relative L 0.30–0.33)....................................... 5

4* palp, especially P-4 rather slender (P-4 L/H 2.8–3.3, relative L 0.34–0.39)........................................ 7

5 male genital field dumbbell-shaped, rounded ( Fig. 65 View FIGURES 65–67 ); both sexes P-5 basal cone large pointed; large claws similar in size ( Fig. 66 View FIGURES 65–67 ); cheliceral claw relatively straight (curve 22–24°) ( Fig. 67 View FIGURES 65–67 )...................................... robustipalpis

5* male genital field apple-shaped ( Fig. 70 View FIGURE 70 , 71); both sexes P-5 basal cone large, blunt; large distal claws of slightly different size, small one slender ( Fig. 68 View FIGURES 68, 69 ); cheliceral claw curved (angle 30–31°), distally very broad ( Fig. 69 View FIGURES 68, 69 )....................... 6

6 male genital field broad apple-shaped (L/ W 0.67 –0.75); Cx-I basally flat rounded, relatively broad (Cx-I L/basal W 1.63 –1.78), Cx-I+II broader (L/ W 0.67 –0.75) ( Fig. 70 View FIGURE 70 )........................................................ macrochela

6* male genital field narrow apple-shaped (L/ W 0.77); Cx-I basally curved rounded, relatively narrow (Cx-I L/basal W 1.90), Cx- I+II narrow (L/ W 0.81) (Fig. 71)....................................................... malosimilis (only male)

The following group of species is clearly separated in the shape of the male genital field, the females are very similar. However in one species the male is unknown.

7 IV-leg-3 proximo-dorsally bearing a group of heavy, short, thick setae (2–4 in females, 4–6 in males) ( Fig. 72 View FIGURES 72–75 ); male genital field relatively broad triangular, posterior margin straight (L/ W 0.50 –0.53) ( Fig. 73 View FIGURES 72–75 ); palp mid-sized ( Fig. 74 View FIGURES 72–75 ); chelicera relatively straight (curve 20°) ( Fig. 75 View FIGURES 72–75 )................................................................ forcipifer

7* IV-leg-3 proximo-dorsally without a group of heavy setae; male genital field compact triangular ( Fig. 76 View FIGURES 76–79 ), posterior margin straight (L/ W 0.55 –0.63) or dumbbell-shaped or broad wing-like with many setae (Figs. 80, 84); palp mid-sized to large ( Figs. 78 View FIGURES 76–79 , 82, 86, 89); chelicera straight to curved (curve 19–26°) ( Figs. 79 View FIGURES 76–79 , 83, 87, 90)................................... 8

8 female genital plates flanking 2/3 of genital opening ( Figs. 77 View FIGURES 76–79 , 81); palp small in both sexes (total L 423–553), P- 4 in females shorter (L 162–188), P-2 ventro-distally always without denticles ( Figs. 78 View FIGURES 76–79 , 82); male genital field triangular or dumbbellshaped ( Figs. 76 View FIGURES 76–79 , 80).................................................................................. 9

8* female genital plates flanking at least 3/4 of genital opening ( Figs. 85 View FIGURES 84–87 , 88 View FIGURES ); both sexes palp large (total L 530–658), P- 4 in females longer (L 204–230), P-2 ventro-distally mostly with very few denticles ( Figs. 86 View FIGURES 84–87 , 89 View FIGURES ); male genital field (only known in one of the following species) broad wing-like, bearing many setae ( Fig. 84 View FIGURES 84–87 )................................... 10

9 male genital field triangular rounded, posterior margin straight ( Fig.76 View FIGURES 76–79 ); both sexes coxal field smaller (Cx-I+II L/W male 254– 306/372–420, female 300–348/426–504, Cx-I basal W male 127, female 150–169, Cx-III+IV L/W male 252–268/222–252, female 282–307/234–258) ( Figs. 76, 77 View FIGURES 76–79 ); chelicera ( Fig. 79 View FIGURES 76–79 ) and palps ( Fig. 78 View FIGURES 76–79 ) relatively small (chelicera L male 330–384, female 402–426, palp total L male 423–456, female 461–500)............................................. aloisii

9* male genital field dumbbell-shaped, broad-oval (Fig. 80); both sexes coxal field larger (Cx-I+II L/W male 294–310/439–462, female 408/589, Cx I basal W male 150–160, female 211, Cx-III+IV L/W male 283–288/270, female 356/320) (Figs. 80, 81); chelicera (Fig. 83) and palps (Fig. 82) larger (chelicera L male 394–408, female 456, palp L 486– 493 males, 550 females)............................................................................................. intermedius

GBIF Dataset (for parent article) Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF