Eufriesea micheneri Ayala & Engel, 2008

Gonzalez, Victor H., Griswold, Terry & Simoes, Marianna, 2017, On the identity of the adventive species of Eufriesea Cockerell in the USA: systematics and potential distribution of the coerulescens species group (Hymenoptera, Apidae), Journal of Hymenoptera Research 55, pp. 55-102 : 67-69

publication ID

https://dx.doi.org/10.3897/jhr.55.12209

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:5DA0672A-D578-41C5-ADAB-BD6528D9ED5D

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/CBA58212-A16F-7419-5780-01F64212937C

treatment provided by

Journal of Hymenoptera Research by Pensoft

scientific name

Eufriesea micheneri Ayala & Engel, 2008
status

 

Eufriesea micheneri Ayala & Engel, 2008 View in CoL

Male, Figs 6 View Figures 4–6 , 18 View Figures 14–19 , 19 View Figures 14–19 , 20 View Figures 20–26 , 112-117 View Figures 112–117 , 118-123 View Figures 118–123 ; Female, Figs 30 View Figures 27–33 , 32 View Figures 27–33 , 66 View Figures 63–66 , 124-127 View Figures 124–127

Eufriesea micheneri Ayala & Engel, 2008: 228 (Holotype: UNAM; ♂, Mexico: Jalisco, Mascota)

Diagnosis.

Superficially this species resembles E. simillima in that both sexes are primarily blue with purple hues. In addition to their geographical separation ( E. simillima occurs in the Sierra Madre de Occidental whereas E. micheneri occupies western parts of the Transverse Volcanic Belt), it can be separated by the length of the tongue (reaching S2 in E. micheneri and only the metatrochanter in E. simillima ), the subapical projection of the anterior margin of the male metatibia (formed by the upper portion of the ridge that borders the depressed area in E. micheneri and by the medial portion of the ridge, and thus located above the inner spur, in E. simillima ), and by the dorsal lobe of gonostylus (apically about as broad as its base and largely bare on its outer surface in E. simillima and apically broad and setose on outer surface in E. micheneri ). From E. barthelli and E. engeli it can be separated by T2 with sparser punctures on disc (contiguous or separated by at most a puncture width in E. barthelli and E. engeli ), metabasitarsus with posterodistal margin angled (broadly rounded in E. barthelli and E. engeli ) and pubescence of mesotibia, between the medial margin of posterior felty patch and anterior margin of tibia (presence on basal half in E. micheneri and basal two-thirds in E. barthelli and E. engeli ).

Morphology.

♂, As described for E. engeli except as follows: Head width 6.3 mm; body length 17.8 mm; forewing length 16.3 mm. Metabasitarsus with inner surface near base strongly protuberant in frontal view, posterodistal margin angled. Hidden sterna and genitalia as in Figs 118-123 View Figures 118–123 .

Mandible black with green, blue, and purple hues on basal third as on labrum; face green with golden and blue hues; vertex and gena blue with purple hues. Meso- and metasoma blue with green hues on anterior two-thirds of mesoscutum and disc of tegula, weak purple hues on remainder areas of mesosoma and marginal zones of terga and sterna.

Face with off-white setae, vertex and gena with gray to black setae. Mesosoma with gray to black setae except on outer surfaces of mesobasitarsi and distitarsi. Mesotibia with area between medial margin of posterior patch and anterior margin of tibia bare on distal half; posterior patch subapically about as broad as distance between its medial margin and anterior margin of tibia. Metasoma with gray setae on terga, white or off-white on S3-S5.

Disc of T2 with finer and sparser punctures than on E. barthelli , punctures separated by at least a puncture width.

♀: Head width 6.0 mm; body length 17.5 mm; forewing length 14.7 mm. Coloration as in the female of E. barthelli but with stronger purple hues. Pubescence black, with whitish on sides of T4 and T5 and discs of S3 and S5 in some specimens. Mesoscutellum with poorly defined row of dense pubescence on median longitudinal groove. T2 with finer, sparser punctures than on E. barthelli .

Distribution.

(Fig. 128 View Figure 128 ) Mexico: Durango, Jalisco, Michoacán, Nayarit. This species appears to be restricted to mid elevation oak and pine forests in the western parts of the Transverse Volcanic Belt.

Material examined.

In addition to the paratypes deposited in SEMC (five males and one female from Mascota, Jaslico , and one male from Santa Tereresa , Nayarit), we also examined the following two females deposited in ECOSUR: 1♀, ECO-TAP-E-118160, Méx., Dgo. [Durango], San Dimas , 1760 m, 24,53210N, 105,81339W, 2/10/2013, 10:00, Col. Liliana Tlapaya GoogleMaps ; 1♀, ECO-TAP-E-102831, Mex., Mich. [ Michoacán], Morelia, J. del Monte , 2172 m, 19,63395N, 101,14644W, 4/7/2013, 10:05, Col. Oscar Martínez López. GoogleMaps

Floral records.

Females have been collected on flowers of Salvia sp. ( Lamiaceae ).

Comments.

Some of the specimens listed under this species by Ayala and Engel (2008) in the section "additional material examined" correspond to E. barthelli . These two species partially overlap in distribution.

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Insecta

Order

Hymenoptera

Family

Apidae

Genus

Eufriesea

Loc

Eufriesea micheneri Ayala & Engel, 2008

Gonzalez, Victor H., Griswold, Terry & Simoes, Marianna 2017
2017
Loc

Eufriesea micheneri

Ayala & Engel 2008
2008