Horniella intricata Yin and Li

Yin, Zi-Wei & Li, Li-Zhen, 2014, Revision of the Oriental genus Horniella Raffray (Coleoptera, Staphylinidae, Pselaphinae), Zootaxa 3850 (1), pp. 1-83 : 47-48

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.3850.1.1

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:BFD1F483-4255-429B-9E17-8D4A9E559C5F

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6142761

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/CD490758-D83E-FFC4-FF01-417240D6FDCF

treatment provided by

Plazi

scientific name

Horniella intricata Yin and Li
status

sp. nov.

15. Horniella intricata Yin and Li , new species

Figs 27 View FIGURE 27 A, 28, 49A; Map 4 View MAP 4

Type material (2 ♂♂, 1 ♀). Holotype, ♂, labeled ‘ THAILAND: Mae Hong Son, Mae Lang , 600–700 m, 12.xi.1985, Burckhardt- Löbl / Holotype [red], ♂, Horniella intricata sp. n., det. Yin & Li, 2014, MHNG’ . Paratypes: 1 ♂, 1 ♀, labeled ‘ THAILAND: Chiang Rai Prov., Doi Tung , 1300 m, Schwendingen, 02.x.1992 ’ ( MHNG). Each paratype bears a yellow type label similar to that of the holotype except ‘ PARATYPE ♂ (or ♀)’.

Description. Male ( Fig. 27 View FIGURE 27 A). Length 2.81–2.82 mm. Head slightly longer than wide, HL 0.60–0.61 mm, HW 0.55–0.61 mm; anterolateral genal projections ( Fig. 28 View FIGURE 28 C) distinct, anterior margins roundly concave; median sulcus between antennal tubercles short; scapes ( Fig. 28 View FIGURE 28 B) angularly expanded at basolateral margins; clubs ( Fig. 28 View FIGURE 28 A) loosely formed by apical three moderately enlarged antennomeres; venter with pair of relatively thick lateral spines ( Fig. 28 View FIGURE 28 D). Maxillary palpomeres II stout, widest near middle. Each eye composed of about 35–40 facets. Pronotum slightly longer than wide, PL 0.59–0.60 mm, PW 0.56–0.57 mm. Elytra wider than long, EL 0.78–0.82 mm, EW 1.14–1.20 mm; discal striae reaching apical 4/5 of elytral length. Protrochanters and profemora ( Fig. 28 View FIGURE 28 E) each with one long ventral spine, protibiae ( Fig. 28 View FIGURE 28 F) simple; mesotrochanters ( Fig. 28 View FIGURE 28 G) with extremely short, apically blunt ventral spine, mesofemora and mesotibiae ( Fig. 28 View FIGURE 28 H) simple; tarsomeres II normal, not extending to beneath tarsomeres III. Abdomen large, AL 0.85– 0.78 mm, AW 1.14–1.23 mm, tergite IV (first visible tergite) with distinct median carina extending to near posterior margin, lacking lateral discal carinae, tergite V lacking median carina. Sternite IX ( Fig. 28 View FIGURE 28 I) with well-sclerotized apical half, and membranous narrowed basal half. AeL 0.66 mm; aedeagus ( Figs 28 View FIGURE 28 J–L) with nearly symmetric median lobe, obliquely truncate at apex; endophallus complicated, composed of four major sclerites.

Female. Similar to male in general appearance; each eye composed of about 25 facets; profemora each with two ventral spines near base. BL 2.79 mm, HL 0.61 mm, HW 0.53 mm, PL 0.5 mm, PW 0.55 mm, EL 0.68 mm, EW 1.05 mm, AL 0.91 mm, AW 1.14 mm. Genital complex ( Fig. 49 View FIGURE 49 A) weakly sclerotized, composed of broadly transverse, plate-like apical sclerite, and membranous basal portion.

Differential diagnosis. This species is placed as a member of the H. burckhardti group. The roundly concave anterior margins of the apicolateral genal projections, short and apically blunt ventral spine on the mesotrochanters, the nearly symmetric aedeagal median lobe with an obliquely truncate apex, and complicated structure of the aedeagal endophallus are shared with H. kaengkrachan (described below). These two species can be separated by the more distinctly expanded basolateral margins of the scapes, and the mesotibiae with simple apices in H. intricata , while H. kaengkrachan has the scapes with an indistinct lateral expansion, and a triangular apical projection at the apices of the mesotibiae.

Comments. The populations from Mae Lang and Doi Tung have a nearly identical aedeagal structure, and clearly belong to a same species.

Distribution. Thailand: Mae Hong Son, Chiang Mai ( Map 4 View MAP 4 ).

Collection notes. The holotype was collected from leaf litter samples by sifting and use of Winkler-Moczarski extractors.

Etymology. The specific name refers to the complicated structure of the aedeagal endophallus.

MHNG

Museum d'Histoire Naturelle

GBIF Dataset (for parent article) Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF