Hedychrum caerulescens Lepeletier, 1806
publication ID |
https://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.471.6558 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:9068F500-995E-4D18-93A4-A79ECB9A4ABB |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/CDB92C55-02B2-5717-08D3-688DE896D071 |
treatment provided by |
|
scientific name |
Hedychrum caerulescens Lepeletier, 1806 |
status |
|
Taxon classification Animalia Hymenoptera Chrysididae
Hedychrum caerulescens Lepeletier, 1806 View in CoL
Hedychrum caerulescens : Lepeletier 1806: 122.
Type locality.
" Mâle et femelle. Donné par M. Walkenaer qui l’a trouvée aux environs de Paris".
Material.
Lectotype (here designated) ♂. Hedychrum caeruleus ( Chrysis ) Deg. [De Geer] - ( Omalus ) Dhlbm. Hedychrum caerulescens Lepel. 122 coll. St. Fargeau, Parisiae.
Catalogue Casolari & Casolari Moreno. Hedychrum caeruleus , 36, 185, 53, 1 (box 50).
Remarks.
Lepeletier (1806) described Hedychrum caerulescens based on two specimens, one male and one female. One of these two syntypes was acquired by Spinola and belongs to the species Pseudomalus violaceus (Scopoli, 1763); the second syntype is housed at MNHN. Du Buysson (1898: 563) listed one specimen in Lepeletier’s collection Hedychrum coerulescens = Ellampus caeruleus (De Geer), but it is not listed as a type. We examined the second syntype (currently in the general collection MNHN box 8). It belongs to the same species, Pseudomalus violaceus (Scopoli), even though it is placed under the name of Omalus aeneus (Fabricius).
We designate as lectotype of Hedychrum caerulescens Lepeletier the syntype male. The reason is to fix the synonym with Pseudomalus violaceus (Scopoli). The specimen is damaged, lacking its fore wings and left hind wing, and it is partially covered by mould.
Current status.
Pseudomalus violaceus (Scopoli, 1763) (synonymised by Dalla Torre 1892: 19; transferred by Kimsey and Bohart 1991: 270).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.