Aleiodes diversus ( Szepligeti , 1903)

van Achterberg, Cornelis, Shaw, Mark R. & Quicke, Donald L. J., 2020, Revision of the western Palaearctic species of Aleiodes Wesmael (Hymenoptera, Braconidae, Rogadinae). Part 2: Revision of the A. apicalis group, ZooKeys 919, pp. 1-259 : 1

publication ID

https://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.919.39642

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:0CC5169A-2325-41AD-938F-179FCB056381

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/CF7B3762-3684-53C6-8D8C-C0F3B0486369

treatment provided by

ZooKeys by Pensoft

scientific name

Aleiodes diversus ( Szepligeti , 1903)
status

 

Aleiodes diversus ( Szepligeti, 1903) Figs 264-265 View Figures 264, 265 , 266-277 View Figures 266–277 , 278-288 View Figures 278–288

Rhogas diversus Szépligeti, 1903: 114; Papp 2004: 216 (as synonym of A. dissector ) [examined].

Rogas dissector var. diversus ; Shenefelt 1975: 1226 (lectotype designation).

Aleiodes (Neorhogas) diversus ; Papp 1977a: 110-112 (re-instated), 1985: 145, 1991a: 81.

Aleiodes diversus ; Belokobylskij et al., 2003: 398 (as synonym of A. dissector ); Papp 2005: 176; Merz and Pasche 2012: 244; van Achterberg 2014: 209.

Type material.

Lectotype, ♀ (MTMA), " Croatia, Buccari [= Bakar], 1893, Pavel", "Lectotypus, ♀", Rogas (s. str.) diversus Szépligeti, 1906 [sic!], Papp, 1968", "Hym. Typ. No. 1011, Mus. Budapest".

Additional material.

Austria, British Isles (England: V.C.s 8, 25, 70), Bulgaria, Croatia, Hungary, Italy (Sicily), Norway, Switzerland. Specimens in ZJUH, BZL, CMIM, MHNG, MRC, MTMA, NMS, RMNH, SDEI, ZSSM. The most recent of the five English specimens seen is dated 1931, and it seems likely that this rather large and showy insect is extinct in Britain.

Molecular data.

None.

Biology.

Unknown. Female specimens have been collected in (May-)June, and also September, suggesting that it may be plurivoltine. This is reinforced by the date of capture of the two available males (which would not have hibernated as an adult) in Sicily on 30.iv.1965 (ZJUH) and 1.v.1994 (RMNH). There is no indication of habitat on data labels and we have not seen reared material.

Diagnosis.

Maximum width of hypoclypeal depression 0.5-0.6 × minimum width of face (Fig. 273 View Figures 266–277 ); OOL of ♀ coarsely punctate and 1.0-1.2 × diameter of posterior ocellus; ventral margin of clypeus (rather) obtuse apically and clypeus not protruding outwards (Fig. 275 View Figures 266–277 ), but sometimes intermediate; length of eye 1.0-1.2 × temple in dorsal view; lobes of mesoscutum densely finely punctate, with interspaces approx. equal to diameter of punctures, shiny and smooth; precoxal area with some rugae medially; vein cu-a of fore wing vertical; surroundings of veins M+CU1 and 1-+2-CU1 largely glabrous; vein 1-CU1 of fore wing 0.7-1.1 × vein 2-CU1 and approx. as long as vein m-cu (Fig. 266 View Figures 266–277 ), rarely shorter; hind femur 3.0-3.3 × longer than wide; hind tarsal claws with medium-sized dark brownish pecten up to apical tooth (Fig. 272 View Figures 266–277 ); 1st tergite widened apically and moderately wide basally (Fig. 269 View Figures 266–277 ); 2nd tergite 0.7-0.8 × as long as wide (Fig. 269 View Figures 266–277 ) and black; 4th-7th tergites of males flat and with long yellowish setae (Figs 279 View Figures 278–288 , 282 View Figures 278–288 ); head black; vein 1-M of fore wing brownish; wing membrane subhyaline.

Description.

Lectotype, ♀, length of fore wing 7.0 mm, of body 10.0 mm.

Head. Antennal segments of ♀ 56, antenna as long as fore wing, its subapical segments robust; frons largely smooth behind antennal sockets; OOL 1.2 × diameter of posterior ocellus, and coarsely punctate, interspaces less than diameter of puncture; vertex coarsely punctate; clypeus rugose; ventral margin of clypeus thick and not protruding forwards (Fig. 275 View Figures 266–277 ); width of hypoclypeal depression 0.6 × minimum width of face (Fig. 273 View Figures 266–277 ); length of eye 1.2 × temple in dorsal view (Fig. 274 View Figures 266–277 ); vertex behind stemmaticum superficially punctate-rugose; clypeus near lower level of eyes; length of malar space 0.3 × length of eye in lateral view.

Mesosoma. Mesoscutal lobes densely and finely punctate, interspaces largely smooth, shiny; precoxal area of mesopleuron coarsely punctate and without rugae medially, mesopleuron coarsely punctate anteriorly and posteriorly; metapleuron moderately punctate; scutellum remotely punctate; propodeum rather convex and coarsely rugose.

Wings. Fore wing: r 0.5 × 3-SR (Fig. 266 View Figures 266–277 ); 1-CU1 horizontal, 0.7 × 2-CU1; r-m 0.5 × 3-SR; 2nd submarginal cell rather long (Fig. 266 View Figures 266–277 ); cu-a vertical, straight; 1-M rather curved posteriorly; surroundings of M+CU1, 1-M and 1-CU1 largely glabrous. Hind wing: marginal cell gradually widened, its apical width 2.3 × width at level of hamuli (Fig. 266 View Figures 266–277 ); 2-SC+R transverse; m-cu largely absent, only as short antefurcal remnant (Fig. 266 View Figures 266–277 ); M+CU:1-M = 35:23; 1r-m 0.7 × 1-M.

Legs. Tarsal claws with rather conspicuous, medium-sized dark brown pecten up to apical tooth (Fig. 272 View Figures 266–277 ); hind coxa largely punctate; hind trochantellus robust; length of hind femur and basitarsus 3.1 and 4.4 × their width, respectively; length of inner hind spur 0.5 × hind basitarsus.

Metasoma. First tergite rather flattened, as long as wide apically; 1st and 2nd tergites with medio-longitudinal carina and coarsely vermiculate-rugose; medio-basal area of 2nd tergite triangular and distinct (Fig. 269 View Figures 266–277 ); 2nd suture deep; 2nd tergite 0.7-0.8 × as long as wide (Fig. 269 View Figures 266–277 ); 3rd tergite densely punctate and interspaces largely smooth, remainder of metasoma largely smooth; 4th and apical half of 3rd tergite without sharp lateral crease; apical third of metasoma rather compressed; ovipositor sheath wide, with rather short setae and apically truncate (Fig. 265 View Figures 264, 265 ).

Colour. Black; mesoscutum (except anterior third), scutellum, clypeus ventrally, mandible, tegulae and legs largely brownish red; palpi, fore coxa largely, telotarsi, hind tarsus and apex of hind tibia (excluding spurs) dark brown; pterostigma blackish brown; veins dark brown, but near wing base yellowish; wing membrane slightly infuscate.

Variation. OOL 1.0-1.2 × diameter of posterior ocellus; mesoscutum of ♀ entirely brownish red or yellowish brown, or anteriorly black; 1st tergite 1.0-1.1 × longer than wide apically; metasoma rarely partly obscurely reddish dark brown; mesopleuron may be just punctate or may have some rugae in lower half. Antennal segments ♀: 55(3), 56(3), 57(3), 58(1), 59(1); ♂ 58(1). Males have mesosoma black (Fig. 278 View Figures 278–288 ), 2nd tergite 0.8-0.9 × as long as basal width of tergite (Fig. 282 View Figures 278–288 ) and apical tergites type 2, setae rather long, fringe long and strong (Fig. 279 View Figures 278–288 ).

Distribution.

*Austria, *British Isles (England; probably extinct), *Bulgaria, Croatia, Hungary, *Italy (Sicily), *Norway, *Switzerland.

Notes.

Close to A. cruentus which, however, almost always has much or all of 1st and 2nd metasomal tergites orange-red (usually wholly black or dark brown in A. diversus ). In addition to characters given in the key A. diversus is a more robust insect, and females have broader antennal segments (distinctly transverse near middle of flagellum) and on average they are fewer in number (although with overlap).

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Insecta

Order

Hymenoptera

Family

Braconidae

Genus

Aleiodes

Loc

Aleiodes diversus ( Szepligeti , 1903)

van Achterberg, Cornelis, Shaw, Mark R. & Quicke, Donald L. J. 2020
2020
Loc

Rhogas diversus

Szepligeti 1903
1903