Psechrus sinensis Berland & Berland, 1914

Bayer, Steffen, 2012, The lace-sheet-weavers — a long story (Araneae: Psechridae: Psechrus), Zootaxa 3379 (1), pp. 1-170 : 97-100

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.3379.1.1

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6303258

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/D0272654-FFE0-5820-FF20-2992FDC146D5

treatment provided by

Felipe

scientific name

Psechrus sinensis Berland & Berland, 1914
status

 

Psechrus sinensis Berland & Berland, 1914 View in CoL

Figs 52a–d View FIGURES 52 , 53a–d View FIGURES 53 , 86a View FIGURES 86 , 89a View FIGURES 89 , 92a View FIGURES 92

Psechrus sinensis Berland, J. and Berland, L. 1914: 131 View in CoL , figs 1–3 (Description of ♂, illustration of ♂). [Syntypes: 2 ♂ (SB 521–522) from CHINA: Guizhou Province (“Kouy-Tchéou”): region of Guiyang (“Env. de Kouy-Yang”), ca. N 26°30' –26°40’, E 106°30' –106°40', 1100–1350 m; P. Cavalerie leg. 1909, 1913; MNHN AR171, all type material examined]. Fage 1929: 360. Schenkel 1963: 20, fig. 3 (Description of s.a. ♀ [?], illustration of s.a. ♀ [?]). Lehtinen 1967: 261 (Syn. with P. singaporensis View in CoL , rejected by subsequent authors), fig. 474 (illustration of ♂). Levi 1982: 123, figs 34–39, ad part, figs 36–39 misidentified (Description of ♂, figs 34–35: illustration of ♂). Song et al. 1999: 397, figs 232G–H, S (illustration of ♂ and ♀). Wang and Yin 2001: 339, figs 24–28 (Description of ♂ and ♀, illustration of ♂ and ♀). Silva 2003: 45, fig. 16a (Non SEM photo of ♂ palp, misidentification, see P. rani View in CoL ). Yang et al. 2003: 44.

Psechrus guiyangensis Yin, Wang and Zhang 1985: 24 View in CoL , figs 4A–D (Description of ♀, illustration of ♀). [Holotype ♀ from CHINA: Guizhou Province: Guiyang; Y.J. Zhang leg. 04.VII.1983; HBI; Paratypes: 4 ♀♀ (one of which SB 524), with same data as for holotype; HBI, only 1 paratype (SB 524) examined, remaining type material not available on request, thus not examined]. Song et al. 1999: 397 (Syn.).

Additional material examined. CHINA: Guizhou Province: Guiyang ; X.P. Wang leg. 30.IX.1997; 1 ♀ ( SB 1176 ), AMNH. Anshun, dryland of Giyangio; X. Xu leg. 02.VII.1999; 1 ♀ ( SB 523 ), HBI .

Doubtful material examined. CHINA: Guizhou Province (“Kouy-Tchéou”): Reg. de Pin-Fa; P. Cavalerie leg. 1908; E. Schenkel det. 1946; 1 s.a. ♀ ( SB 15 ), 1 p. s.a. ♂ ( SB 606 ), MNHN AR186 .

Revised diagnosis (see also diagnosis for sinensis -group above). Males similar to P. triangulus Yang, Zhang, Zhu & Song 2003 in having long embolus base (EB) (longer than conductor [C]), possessing numerous tubercles distally ( Figs 52a–c View FIGURES 52 , 54a–c View FIGURES 54 ). Distinguished by the filiform distal part of embolus (E) and by the tip of C pointing prolaterally ( Fig. 52b View FIGURES 52 ). Females similar to P. triangulus in having median septum (MS) with posterior part at least four times broader than anterior part ( Figs 53a View FIGURES 53 , 54e View FIGURES 54 ). Copulatory ducts (CD) without twist, the bulbous sections of CD about as broad as spermatheca ( Figs 53b View FIGURES 53 , 54f View FIGURES 54 ). Distinguished by the anteriorly rounded posterior section of MS ( Fig. 53a View FIGURES 53 ), the broader copulatory ducts and the spermathecae laterally just slightly extending beyond CD ( Fig. 53b View FIGURES 53 ).

Description. Male (both male syntypes in bad condition and cut in many pieces; one [SB 521] was in a slightly better condition than the other and all limbs were still available, could be assigned respectively and could be measured; for SB 522 carapace measurements are listed in parentheses):

Body and eye measurements. Carapace length 11.1 (11.0), carapace width 8.0 (7.3), anterior width of carapace 4.5 (4.2), opisthosoma length 12.7 (11.8), opisthosoma width 6.6 (6.0). Eyes: AME 0.56, ALE 0.54, PME 0.61, PLE 0.56, AME–AME 0.26, AME–ALE 0.10, PME–PME 0.40, PME–PLE 0.43, AME–PME 0.71, ALE–PLE 0.57, clypeus height at AME 1.39, clypeus height at ALE 1.22.

Cheliceral furrow with three promarginal and four retromarginal teeth.

Measurements of palp and legs. Leg formula: 1243. Palp: 14.0 [4.8, 2.4, 1.9, 4.9]; Legs: I 86.6 [23.3, 5.5, 24.5, 24.1, 9.2], II 69.4 [19.1, 4.8, 18.5, 19.4, 7.6], III 45.9 [13.5, 3.6, 11.3, 12.5, 5.0], IV 69.0 [18.1, 4.3, 17.7, 18.9, 7.4]. Spination. Palp: 131, 000, 0000; legs: femur I 525{525}, II 545{645}, III 545, IV 544; patella I–IV 000; tibia I–II 3038, III 2035, IV 3036; metatarsus I 2025 {3035}, II 3035, III 3036, IV 4034.

Palpal femur ventrally modified with rounded bulge ( Fig. 52d View FIGURES 52 ).

Copulatory organ (see also diagnosis and general description for sinensis -group). Conductor (C) with pointed tip ( Figs 52a–c View FIGURES 52 ). Sperm duct with broad V- shaped course. Embolus (E) basally with rounded apophysis, folded retrolaterally ( Fig. 52c View FIGURES 52 ). Palpal tibia short ( Figs 52a–c View FIGURES 52 ).

Female (measurements of paratype SB 524 of P. guiyangensis first, those of specimen SB 523 from Anshun in parentheses behind):

Body and eye measurements. Carapace length 8.7 (7.4), carapace width 6.2 (5.3), anterior width of carapace 4.0 (3.6), opisthosoma length 11.9 (11.1), opisthosoma width 6.3 (4.6). Eyes: AME 0.47 (0.45), ALE 0.48 (0.41), PME 0.52 (0.43), PLE 0.48 (0.42), AME–AME 0.23 (0.20), AME–ALE 0.04 (0.04), PME–PME 0.35 (0.34), PME–PLE 0.50 (0.48), AME–PME 0.65 (0.66), ALE–PLE 0.59 (0.59), clypeus height at AME 1.07 (0.82), clypeus height at ALE 1.02 (0.81).

Cheliceral furrow with three promarginal and four retromarginal teeth.

Measurements of palp and legs. Leg formula: 1243. Palp: 10.3 (9.0) [3.6 (3.0), 1.5 (1.4), 1.9 (1.6), 3.3 (3.0)]; Legs: I 46.6 (40.7) [11.4 (11.3), 3.6 (3.1), 13.5 (11.2), 12.3 (10.3), 5.8 (4.8)], II 37.8 (32.8) [10.4 (9.4), 3.4 (2.9), 10.0 (8.6), 9.4 (8.1), 4.6 (3.8)], III 25.6 (23.5) [6.2 (7.2), 2.6 (2.1), 6.6 (5.6), 6.9 (5.7), 3.3 (2.9)], IV 37.8 (32.2) [10.4 (9.5), 3.0 (2.5, 9.8 (8.2), 9.8 (8.2), 4.8 (3.8)].

Palpal claw with 14 teeth.

Spination. Palp: 131, 110, 1101, 1014; legs: femur I 546 (546), II 546 (545), III 545 (546), IV 545 {544} (544); patella I–IV 000; tibia I– II 3038 (3038), III 2035 {2024} (2035), IV 2034 (2034); metatarsus I– III 3035 (3035), IV 3035 (3036).

Copulatory organ (see also diagnosis and general description of sinensis -group). Slit sense organs and epigynal muscle sigilla outside epigynal field ( Fig. 53a View FIGURES 53 ). In comparison to P. triangulus spermathecal heads arising a bit more ventrally at spermatheca ( Fig. 53b View FIGURES 53 ).

Colouration of male and female (see also description for sinensis -group and Psechrus ). Median bands on carapace not serrated. Lateral bands extremely narrow or absent (if present, at most 0.2 diameter of PME) and not serrated. Light longitudinal line ventrally on opisthosoma mostly broken subdistally (rarely strongly constricted subdistally) and medium-sized to broad. If measured centrally on opisthosoma, its width is slightly less than the width of one half of the cribellum (ca. 0.6–0.9 of one half of the cribellum). Distal part (patch) broader than main section.

Variation of copulatory organs. Males: The two syntype males examined showed no significant variation. Females: Posterior part of MS a bit longer in SB 523 from Anshun ( Fig. 53d View FIGURES 53 ). Vulvae without significant variation.

Remarks: Schenkel (1963) described a subadult female and a pre-subadult male under P. sinensis . Apparently, he actually intended to describe a new species based on these specimens (as types), which are deposited in the arachnid collection of MNHN: 1 s.a. ♀ (SB 15) and 1 p. s.a. ♂ (SB 606) (both MNHN AR 186). The label of the respective vial contains the note “ Psechrus cavaleriei Schenkel TYPE!”. It goes without saying that this name (and so the “ types ”) is not valid, as Schenkel had never published a description of a “ Psechrus cavaleriei ”. To date the pre-epigyne of P. sinensis is unknown, consequently I cannot confirm if the two specimens really belong to P. sinensis . I have been unable to check subadult females collected at exactly the same locality as adult material of P. sinensis . The same problem concerns P. kunmingensis Yin, Wang & Zhang, 1985 (see respective species description herein). The s.a. ♀ examined by Schenkel shows some similarities to subadult females collected just a few km away from type locality of P. kunmingensis .

Distribution. China ( Fig. 96 View FIGURE 96 ).

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Arachnida

Order

Araneae

Family

Psechridae

Genus

Psechrus

Loc

Psechrus sinensis Berland & Berland, 1914

Bayer, Steffen 2012
2012
Loc

Psechrus guiyangensis

Song, D. X. & Zhu, M. S. & Chen, J. 1999: 397
Yin, C. M. & Wang, J. F. & Zhang, Y. J. 1985: 24
1985
GBIF Dataset (for parent article) Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF