Cymbalophus Hooker, 1984
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5252/geodiversitas2023v45a9 |
publication LSID |
urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:1C430978-5EE6-49AE-AF7C-23C710161CB7 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8040623 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/D066B24B-520D-B669-FEF2-FD00DA8BFA39 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Cymbalophus Hooker, 1984 |
status |
|
Genus Cymbalophus Hooker, 1984
Cymbalophus Hooker, 1984: 230 .
TYPE SPECIES. — Hyracotherium cuniculus ( Owen, 1842) by original designation.
INCLUDED SPECIES. — Cymbalophus hookeri .
EMENDED DIAGNOSIS (based on Hooker 1994). — Moderate lophodonty. Hypoconulid of m1-2 small and closely appressed to the hypolophid. Hypoconulid of m3 linked to the hypoconid. Medium sized upper molar paraconule, metaconule smaller. Centrocrista of upper molar straight.
DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS. — Smaller than Pliolophus and Hyracotherium . Hypoconulid of m1-2 small and closely appressed to the hypolophid, whereas it is linked to the hypoconid in Pliolophus . More developed lophodonty than Pliolophus and Hallensia . Differs from Hyracotherium by the absence of mesostyle.
NOTES
The genus Cymbalophus was created byHooker (1984) for the species C. cuniculus , previously classified within Hyracotherium ( Owen 1842) . Hooker (1984) considered Cymbalophus as a ceratomorph, not a hippomorph. Hooker (1994) subsequently considered this species to be a hippomorph, but its phylogenetic position is still debated, probably because the type species is poorly known.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |