Cymbalophus Hooker, 1984

Bronnert, Constance & Métais, Grégoire, 2023, Early Eocene hippomorph perissodactyls (Mammalia) from the Paris Basin, Geodiversitas 45 (9), pp. 277-326 : 286

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.5252/geodiversitas2023v45a9

publication LSID

urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:1C430978-5EE6-49AE-AF7C-23C710161CB7

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.8040623

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/D066B24B-520D-B669-FEF2-FD00DA8BFA39

treatment provided by

Felipe

scientific name

Cymbalophus Hooker, 1984
status

 

Genus Cymbalophus Hooker, 1984

Cymbalophus Hooker, 1984: 230 .

TYPE SPECIES. — Hyracotherium cuniculus ( Owen, 1842) by original designation.

INCLUDED SPECIES. — Cymbalophus hookeri .

EMENDED DIAGNOSIS (based on Hooker 1994). — Moderate lophodonty. Hypoconulid of m1-2 small and closely appressed to the hypolophid. Hypoconulid of m3 linked to the hypoconid. Medium sized upper molar paraconule, metaconule smaller. Centrocrista of upper molar straight.

DIFFERENTIAL DIAGNOSIS. — Smaller than Pliolophus and Hyracotherium . Hypoconulid of m1-2 small and closely appressed to the hypolophid, whereas it is linked to the hypoconid in Pliolophus . More developed lophodonty than Pliolophus and Hallensia . Differs from Hyracotherium by the absence of mesostyle.

NOTES

The genus Cymbalophus was created byHooker (1984) for the species C. cuniculus , previously classified within Hyracotherium ( Owen 1842) . Hooker (1984) considered Cymbalophus as a ceratomorph, not a hippomorph. Hooker (1994) subsequently considered this species to be a hippomorph, but its phylogenetic position is still debated, probably because the type species is poorly known.

GBIF Dataset (for parent article) Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF