Tapinocyba affinis pyrenaea Millidge, 1979
publication ID |
https://dx.doi.org/10.3897/BDJ.6.e29443 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/D30A976F-1BEE-3495-2B9D-94BA1F7000E1 |
treatment provided by |
|
scientific name |
Tapinocyba affinis pyrenaea Millidge, 1979 |
status |
|
Tapinocyba affinis pyrenaea Millidge, 1979
Materials
Type status: Other material. Occurrence: individualCount: 5; sex: male; Location: locationID: O1; continent: Europe; country: Spain; countryCode: ES; stateProvince: Aragón; county: Huesca; locality: O Furno ; verbatimElevation: 1396.73; decimalLatitude: 42.60677; decimalLongitude: 0.13135; geodeticDatum: WGS84; Event: eventID: A; samplingProtocol: Pitfall GoogleMaps Type status: Other material. Occurrence: individualCount: 1; sex: male; Location: locationID: O1; continent: Europe; country: Spain; countryCode: ES; stateProvince: Aragón; county: Huesca; locality: O Furno ; verbatimElevation: 1396.73; decimalLatitude: 42.60677; decimalLongitude: 0.13135; geodeticDatum: WGS84; Event: eventID: D; samplingProtocol: Pitfall GoogleMaps Type status: Other material. Occurrence: individualCount: 2; sex: male; Location: locationID: O1; continent: Europe; country: Spain; countryCode: ES; stateProvince: Aragón; county: Huesca; locality: O Furno ; verbatimElevation: 1396.73; decimalLatitude: 42.60677; decimalLongitude: 0.13135; geodeticDatum: WGS84; Event: eventID: I; samplingProtocol: Pitfall GoogleMaps Type status: Other material. Occurrence: individualCount: 2; sex: male; Location: locationID: O1; continent: Europe; country: Spain; countryCode: ES; stateProvince: Aragón; county: Huesca; locality: O Furno ; verbatimElevation: 1396.73; decimalLatitude: 42.60677; decimalLongitude: 0.13135; geodeticDatum: WGS84; Event: eventID: K; samplingProtocol: Pitfall GoogleMaps
Distribution
Spain, France
Notes
Although subspecies are seldom used nowadays in arachnology to address taxonomical issues, the present batch of specimens fit perfectly the cited subspecies described by Millidge; in the same publication, he remarks that of all the subspecies treated in his work, this is the most likely to represent a separate species ( Millidge 1979). To properly assess this, a generic revision would be necessary. Therefore we keep a conservative approach in the identification of these specimens. See Species delimitation and identification using DNA barcodes.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |