Brachytydeus Thor sensu André, 2005

Silva, Guilherme Liberato Da, Metzelthin, Maicon Henrique, Silva, Onilda Santos Da & Ferla, Noeli Juarez, 2016, Catalogue of the mite family Tydeidae (Acari: Prostigmata) with the world key to the species, Zootaxa 4135 (1), pp. 1-68 : 41-47

publication ID

https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.4135.1.1

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:0A1EB3C1-E4B4-429D-915D-B291EDEAA485

DOI

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4669795

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/D431E310-E341-081B-FF6F-F973FA3D70E3

treatment provided by

Plazi

scientific name

Brachytydeus Thor sensu André, 2005
status

 

Key to the species of Brachytydeus Thor sensu André, 2005

1. Ornamentation type “ Lorryia ” or “Mountains”: dorsal side of idiosoma completely or partially reticulated; reticulation occurs at least in dorso-central region between setae d1, although in some cases the meshes in this region may be extremely elongated in transversal line (then, cross-ties and costulae on the striae are “X”-shaped).......................................2

- Another type of ornamentation: dorsal side of idiosoma completely or partially striated or granulated; striation occurs at least in dorso-central region, between setae d1 ..................................................................53

2. Palptarsus eupathidium (p’ζ) rod-like and rounded distally, thick and relatively long (not shorter than ½ of length of palptarsus).................................................................................................... 3

- Another shape of (p’ζ).................................................................................. 6

3. Dorsal reticulation forms discrete areas divided by striae; all dorsal idiosomal setae lanceolate, curved and sharp with excep- tion of ps1, which are expanded and blunt distally......................... B. nytebodensis ( Momen & Lundqvist, 1995)

- No discrete areas present: all dorsum covered with reticulum; dorsal setae of various shapes..........................4

4. Dorsal idiosomal setae aciculate and smooth; meshes of reticulum not elongated and more or less similar in shape.................................................................................... B. montrealensis ( Marshall, 1970)

- Another type of dorsal idiosomal setae; meshes of reticulum different in shape: most distinctly elongated................ 5

5. Dorsal idiosomal setae similar in shape: minutely serrate and sharply ended; eupathidium (p’ζ) distinctly longer than 1/2 of length of palptarsus............................................................ B. parataurica (Momen, 1988)

- Dorsal idiosomal setae different in shape: ro, la, ex, c1 and c2 rod-like, d1 and e1— slightly enlarged distally, the remaining setae broadly expanded; all dorsal setae blunt and smooth; eupathidium (p’ζ) as long as 1/2 of length of palptarsus........................................................................... B. parainflata ( Momen & Lundqvist, 1995)

6. Palptarsus dumpy and short: length less than twice its width.................................................... 7

- Palptarsus elongate: length greater than twice its width....................................................... 11

7. Dorsum completely reticulated, without discrete areas; dorsal idiosomal setae straight.................................................................................................... B. ivoensis (Momen & Lundqvist, 1996)

- Dorsal reticulation divided into discrete areas; dorsal idiosomal setae distinctly bent, sometimes nearly semicircular....... 8

8. Dorsal idiosomal setae narrowly or distinctly lanceolate....................................................... 9

- Dorsal idiosomal setae pointed, gradually narrowed toward the sharp tips........................................ 10

9. Dorsal idiosomal setae of medium length (28-32), sabre-shaped, narrowly lanceolate and serrated; dorsal leg setae (excluding tarsal setae) and ft ’ on tarsus I serrate; gnathosoma hidden under aspidosoma and only distal part of stilettos visible from above; setae ps1 of the same shape as all dorsal setae..................................... B. polita Kuznetzov, 1975

- Dorsal idiosomal setae short (11-16), distinctly lanceolate and nude; dorsal leg setae (except tarsal setae) and ft ’ on tarsus I lan- ceolate and nude; gnathosoma partially visible from above; setae ps1 finer and more slender than all dorsal setae..................................................................................... B. sherekhani (Kaźmierski, 1998)

10. Dorsal leg setae distinctly lanceolate; frames of polygons of reticulum with a relatively great number of costulae, each side of polygon with 4-9 costulae between neighbouring cross-ties................. B. arkadiensis (Panou & Emmanouel, 1995)

- Dorsal leg setae stouter without setae lanceolate; frames of polygons with a relatively small number of costulae, each side of polygon with 1-3 three costulae between cross-ties....................................... B. catenulata ( Thor, 1931)

11. Dorsal reticulation forms discrete areas divided by striae..................................................... 12

- No discrete areas present: entire dorsal side covered with reticulation...........................................30

12. All dorsal idiosomal setae blunt: not narrowed distally (rod-like) or expanded distally (club-shaped, spatulate)........... 13

- At least some dorsal idiosomal setae tapering to a point...................................................... 15

13. Dorsal idiosomal setae short expanded distally (club-shaped); setae f1 much shorter than 1/2 of distance f1-h1 ........................................................................................... B. podocarpa ( Baker, 1968)

- Dorsal idiosomal setae long and rod-like, not expanded distally; setae f1 distinctly longer than 1/2 of distance f1-h1 ...... 14

14. Dorsal idiosomal setae rod-like serrated........................................... B. polygonata ( Kulczycki, 1992)

- Dorsal idiosomal setae rod-like smooth.................................................. B. evansi ( Baker, 1968)

15. Between setae c1 with transverse striae; setae c1 and c2 lie in striated cuticle.................. B. benensis ( Baker, 1968)

- Between setae c1 with reticulation; setae c1 and c2 lie in reticulation............................................ 16

16. Setae ro distinctly different in shape in comparison with h1, h2 and ps1 ..........................................17

- All dorsal setae of the same type .........................................................................18

17. Dorsal idiosomal setae lanceolate and pointed, with the exception of h1, h2 and ps1, which are blunt and rounded distally; cen- tral part of opisthosoma covered with a single, large reticulate area, containing six pairs of setae: c1, c2, d1, e1, f1 and f2 .................................................................................. B. minuta ( Kuznetzov, 1971)

- All dorsal idiosomal setae narrowly lanceolate with the exception of broadly lanceolate ro; dorsal reticulation decomposed broken into many small discrete areas.................................................... B. funki ( Baker, 1968)

18. All dorsal idiosomal setae broadly lanceolate: expanded on their distal part, but tapering at ends...................... 19

- All dorsal idiosomal setae shaped differently............................................................... 20

19. Dorsal idiosomal setae serrate; reticulate areas of setae c1 and c2 united in a single A(c1)(c2); similarly, d1 and e1 lie in a com- mon area A(d1)(e1)............................................................... B. cooremani ( Baker, 1968)

- Dorsal idiosomal setae nude; reticulate areas are divided into A c2, A(c1), A c2, A e1, A(d1), and A e1 .................................................................................................. B. formosa ( Cooreman, 1958)

20. Dorsal idiosomal setae very strongly serrated....................................... B. pinnigera (Kuznetzov, 1973)

- Dorsal setae shaped differently, smooth or not strongly serrated................................................ 21

21. “Mountains” type of reticulation (the cuticle forms multitubercular “Mountains” located side by side, and each of them has several sharp edges “running down along the slopes”)........................................................22

- Reticulation flat: no “Mountains” ornamentation present......................................................23

22. Dorsal aspidosoma with regular and polygonal meshes; the larger subcuticular polygons separate from regular meshes; dorsal idiosomal setae slightly serrate...................................................... B. scopa (Kuznetzov, 1975)

- Dorsal aspidosoma with irregular arrangement of meshes, most of which are shaped as very narrow rectangles; no large subcu- ticular polygons; dorsal idiosomal setae nude........................................ B. collicupata ( Schiess, 1981)

23. “U”-shaped reticulated area absent....................................................................... 24

- A distinctive “U”-shaped reticulated area A(e1)(f2)(f1), or A(e1)(f2)(f1)(h2)(h1) present............................ 27

24. Dorsal idiosomal setae pointed, straight; four reticulate areas with polygonal reticulation: three on aspidosoma and one cau-

dally, AA0, A[la]0[bo], A[bo]0[la] and A(h1)(h2)(ps1); rest of body surface covered with extremely elongated meshes similar to striation; cross-ties and costulae “X”-shaped.......................................... B. crucifera ( Karg, 1973) - Dorsal idiosomal setae narrowly lanceolate, more or less strongly curved or semicircular, gradually tapering to pointed ends; ornamentation different, not divided into four areas; cross-ties “Y”-shaped or triangular; costulae mainly “I”-shaped......25

25. Dorsal idiosomal setae only slightly curved; meshes of reticulum small and different in shape; reticulate areas separated by finer network with more elongated cells; centrally, between A(c1) and A(d1), an area of elongated rectangular reticulation; bothridial setae (bo) with sparsely distributed small serrations.............. B. mantiniensis (Panou & Emmanouel, 1995)

- Dorsal idiosomal setae distinctly curved (usually sabre-shaped), or simply semicircular; meshes of reticulum large, in shape of regular polygons; reticulate areas separated by striation; no discrete area between A(c1) and A(d1); bothridial setae (bo) smooth............................................................................................. 26

26. Dorsal idiosomal setae serrated; empodial hooks (om) absent; gnathosoma hidden under aspidosoma................................................................................. B. relhaniae (Ueckermann & Smith Meyer, 1988)

- Dorsal idiosomal setae seem smooth (at most “rough” under immersion); empodial hooks (om) present, although small; gnathosoma visible from above.......................................................... B. sightori ( Baker, 1968)

27. Reticulate areas separated by finer network; frames of cells with rounded pores; dorsal idiosomal setae straight but delicate, very narrowly lanceolate, distinctly pointed and short (12–19); gnathosoma hidden under aspidosoma............................................................................................... .. B. snajperi (Kaźmierski, 1998)

- Reticulate areas separated by striae; frames of cells without rounded pores; dorsal idiosomal setae straight but stout, stiff, equally thick in at least 4/5 of their total length, and becoming narrow near the ends, but not distinctly pointed, and slightly longer (17–25); gnathosoma visible from above............................................................... 28

28. Atypical number of genital setae in adults: five pairs; dorsal idiosomal setae nude................ B. ancora ( Karg, 1973)

- Six pairs of genital setae in adults; dorsal idiosomal setae with small, scarcely distributed spikes...................... 29

29. Meshes of reticulation are regular, equal in shape; reticulate areas divided by striae; empodial hooks (om) present but very small; solenidion ω I long, reaching to base of tectals................................. .. B. danutae (Kaźmierski, 1978)

- Meshes of reticulation are irregular, unequal in shape, often elongated in places; reticulate areas divided by very narrow meshes which lie deeper, forming furrows; empodia with triangular basal process only, empodial hooks absent; solenidion ω I very short, not reaching to base of tectals............................. B. persiaensis Akbari, Haddad & Khanjani 2015

30. Body strongly lobed in all stages; almost all opisthosomal setae each inserted in a single lobus.......................31

- Body of adults without strong lobes...................................................................... 32

31. Dorsal idiosomal setae almost straight, nude, equally thick, narrowed distally, but not sharp apically and extremely long: distinctly longer than whiplike bothridial setae.............................................. .. B. atyeoi ( Baker, 1968)

- Dorsal idiosomal setae narrowly lanceolate, curved, slightly serrate, pointed, and shorter: distinctly shorter than whiplike bothridial setae.................................................................... B. turrialbensis ( Baker, 1968)

32. At least some dorsal idiosomal setae blunt: rod-like, or expanded distally (club-like, spatulate)....................... 33

- Dorsal idiosomal setae pointed: no dorsal idiosomal setae rod-like, club-like, or spatulate........................... 41

33. Club-like or spatulate setae present....................................................................... 34

- All setae rod-like..................................................................................... 39

34. “Mountains–shape” type of reticulation (a cross-section through these “mountains” gives the picture of “stars”, or “craters”)....................................................................................................35

- Another type of reticulation (not “Mountains”).............................................................36

35. Three types of dorsal idiosomal setae: narrowly rod-like (ro, la), strongly spatulate (h1, h2, ps1) and the remaining setae clublike, rounded distally, in shape of spoon (remaining setae); setae ps1, and also h1 and h2 situated ventrally; all setae slightly serrate.......................................................................... B. collyerae ( Baker, 1968)

- Two types of dorsal idiosomal setae: club-like (h1, h2 and ps1) and rod-like (all others); at least setae h1 and h2 situated dorsally; all setae nude............................................................... B. stellata ( Carmona, 1972)

36. Dorsal idiosomal setae relatively longer: setae f1 extend to bases of h1 ... B. pongolana (Ueckermann & Smith Meyer, 1979)

- Dorsal idiosomal setae relatively shorter: setae f1 reach only halfway to bases of h1 ................................ 37

37. Dorsal idiosomal setae haired; meshes of reticulum extremely elongated: they give the picture of striation subtype “ Paralorryia s. str. ”...................................................................... B. incrustata (Kuznetzov, 1972)

- Dorsal idiosomal setae not haired; meshes irregular, but not so strongly elongated................................. 38

38. Dorsal opisthosomal setae broadly spatulate: ratio of length to maximum width is nearly 5/1; between setae bo and setae c1, as well as in dorso-central region, the meshes are only slightly elongated....................... B. teresae ( Carmona, 1970)

- Dorsal opisthosomal setae rod-like; between (bo) and between (c1) the meshes are distinctly elongated............................................................................................... .. B. pulchra (Oudemans, 1929) junior synonym: Tydeus inflatus Momen, 1988

39. Dorsal idiosomal setae straight or slightly curved; reticulation composed of regular meshes; body of immatures not lobed................................................................................ B. reticulata ( Oudemans, 1928) junior synonym: L. bedfordiensis Evans, 1952

- Dorsal idiosomal setae evidently bent down to dorsal surface, sometimes “S”-shaped (two points of bending); reticulation composed of irregular meshes; body of immatures lobed..................................... B. stefani ( André, 1987)

40. Dorsal side of opisthosoma covered with reticulation of “Mountains” type ............. B. danhidalgoi (Kaźmierski, 1998)

- Another type of dorsal reticulation....................................................................... 41

41. All meshes of reticulation equal in shape, polygonal, approximately as long as broad; dorsal idiosomal setae long: similar in length to bothridial setae (with exception of ps1)............................................................ 42

- Meshes of reticulation irregular, unequal in shape, often elongated in some places; dorsal idiosomal setae not so long: shorter than bothridial setae.................................................................................. 43

42. Meshes in form of extremely large cells; dorsal idiosomal setae sabre-shaped: broad, curved and pointed; setae ps1 different than other dorsal setae: straight and blunt........................................ B. raphignathoides (Berlese, 1910)

- Meshes not extremely large; dorsal idiosomal setae sharply ended but straight, narrow, aciculate; setae ps1 shorter than other dorsal setae, but of the same shape................................................... B. summersi ( Baker, 1968)

43. Meshes approximately as long as broad between bothridial setae (bo)........................................... 44

- Meshes longitudinally elongated between bothridial setae (bo)................................................. 50

44. Dorsal idiosomal setae pointed and smooth................................................................ 45

- Dorsal idiosomal setae not pointed (but may be narrowed distally) and not smooth................................. 46

45. Solenidion ωI short (4.5–5.5); not reaching bases of tectal setae tcζ; empodial hooks (om) well developed............................................................................................... ... B. terrestris ( Karg, 1973)

- Solenidion ωI longer (7): reaching bases of (tcζ); empodial hooks (om) absent............... B. mattheyi ( Schiess, 1981)

46. Bothridial setae (bo) stout, blunt distally and faintly serrate; distance f1-f1 longer than d1-d1 .................................................................................................. B. hughesae ( Momen & Sinha, 1991)

- Bothridial setae (bo) whiplike: pointed and nude; distance f1-f1 not longer than d1-d1 ..............................47

47. Caudal part of dorsum with narrow and transversely elongated meshes; body length: ca 350, width: ca 250.............................................................................................. B. electra (Kuznetzov, 1973)

- Caudal part of dorsum covered with polygonal meshes; body length: 250–275, width: 145–175.......................48

48. Dorsal idiosomal setae gradually tapering, covered with clearly visible, rounded, blunt teeth. B. echinulata ( Kuznetzov, 1971)

- Dorsal setae almost lanceolate, covered with scarcely visible, sharp teeth........................................ 49

49. Bothridial setae (bo) about three times longer than other dorsal setae; ventral striae between metasternal setae form a “V”- shaped pattern............................................................. B. varsoviensis (Kaźmierski, 1978)

- Bothridial setae (bo) two times longer than other dorsal setae; striae between metasternal setae orientated longitudinally....................................................................... B. adamantia (Panou & Emmanouel, 1995)

50. Idiosoma distinctly elongate: ratio of body-proportion (length/width) 1.8; dorsal idiosomal setae with very small serration, appearing nude; body reticulation extremely irregular......................... B. epimekes ( Panou & Kaźmierski, 1996)

- Idiosoma more broad: ratio of body proportion no higher than 1.5; dorsal setae nude...............................51

51. Empodial hooks (om) absent...................................... B. paravarsoviensis (Momen & Lundqvist, 1996)

- Empodial hooks (om) present........................................................................... 52

52. Dorsal idiosomal setae almost straight, aciculate and smooth (length: 20–29); setae f1 reach half way of f1-h1 distance; ratio of body-proportion 1.5; gnathosoma visible from above, not covered by aspidosoma; empodial hooks (om) poorly developed, scarcely visible.................................................................. B. martini ( Marshall, 1970)

- Dorsal idiosomal setae slightly curved, narrowly lanceolate and serrate (length: 15–17); setae f1 not reaching half way of f1-h1 distance; body broader, ratio of body proportion 1.23; gnathosoma completely covered by aspidosoma; empodial hooks (om) very well developed, strong..................................................... B. sororcula (Kuznetzov, 1975)

53. With the following four character states: palptarsus stubby, short, not longer than double its width; cheliceral stilettos longer than total length of palptarsus combined with terminal eupathidium; dorsal idiosomal setae short, very narrowly lanceolate, nude and sharply ended, several times shorter than the bothridial setae (bo), which are long and whiplike; reticulation absent (rarely a small AA0 near the anterior projection of aspidosoma)................................................ 54

- Lacking at least one of mentioned above combination of features............................................... 58

54. Palptarsus spherical (ratio of length to width 1:1); palptarsus eupathidium (p’ζ) almost straight and acute, without terminal cross-piece; striation type “ Tydeus ”............................................ B. globulipalpa (Kaźmierski, 1998)

- Palptarsus longer than its breadth; palptarsus eupathidium (p’ζ) curved and with wedge-like cross-piece on its peak; striation variable............................................................................................ 55

55. Palptarsus 1.5 times longer than its width (ratio 1.5:1); striation type “ Tydeus ”............... B. volgini (Kuznetzov, 1973)

- Palptarsus two times longer than its width (ratio 2:1); striation type variable...................................... 56

56. Body elongated as usual: ratio of idiosomal length/width 1.8–2.0........................ B. aberrans ( Oudemans, 1932)

- Body broad: ratio of idiosomal length/width 1.3–1.4......................................................... 57

57. Empodial hooks (om) in form of small thorn; solenidion ωI broadly lanceolate; area AA0 absent; inconsistency of arrangement of dorsal striae: striation type “ Tydeus ”, as well as “ Paralorryia ”, but sometimes “Mesoparalorryia-incerta” or “ Paralorryia s. str ”............................................................................. B. brevicula ( Koch, 1838) junior synonym: Tydeus curtus Berlese, 1910

- Empodial hooks (om) absent; solenidion ωI slender, uniformly narrow; small area AA0 present; striation type “ Tydeus ”........................................................................... B. frekei (Momen & Lundqvist, 1996)

58. Ornamentation type “ Paralorryia s. str. ”, ”Mesoparalorryia”, “Biparalorryia”, “Biparalorryia-incerta”, “Mesoparalorryia- incerta”, “Veniparalorryia”, “Paravenilia”, ( Figure 1 View FIGURE 1 .B–I)..................................................... 59

- Another type of ornamentation......................................................................... 158

59. Palptarsus eupathidium not broadened or cleft distally, without goblet shape, “T”-shaped, crescent-shaped piece or wedge-like tip................................................................................................ 60

- Palptarsus eupathidium (p’ζ) becoming narrower toward the subapically, but broadened or cleft distally, with goblet-shape, or “T”-shape tip, or terminated with a crescent-shaped piece or wedge-like cross-piece................................88

60. Palptarsus eupathidium (p’ζ) rod-like and rounded distally..................................................... 61

- Palptarsus eupathidium (p’ζ) not rounded distally: acute, thorn-, spike- or blade-like in shape........................82

61. All striae between setae c1 run longitudinally (subtype “Biparalorryia”), or at least the section c1-c1 is perpendicular to the striae only close to the bases of setae (“Biparalorryia-incerta”).................................................62

- Transverse striation between setae c1 .....................................................................68

62. Reticulate area on front of aspidosoma (AA0) present........................................................ 63

- Reticulation absent (no AA0 present)..................................................................... 64

63. Reticulate area AA0 consists of meshes strongly elongated in various directions; ventral striation between setae mt longitudinal: striae form a narrow “V”-pattern; dorsal setae moderately serrated........... B. filiformis (Momen & Lundqvist, 1996)

- Reticulate area AA0 consists of multiangular meshes (more-less as long as broad); ventral striation between setae mt transverse: striae form an obtuse “U”-pattern; dorsal setae strongly serrated.................... B. szeptyckii Kaźmierski 2009

64. Palptarsus as long as its eupathidium (p’ζ); cheliceral stilettos equal in length with combined length of palptarsus and (pζ); dorsal idiosomal setae with small, scarcely visible serration......................................................65

- Palptarsus longer than its eupathidium; cheliceral stilettos shorter than combined length of palptarsus and (p’ζ); dorsal idiosomal setae strongly serrated or plumose ..................................................................66

65. Striation subtype “Biparalorryia-incerta” ( Figure 1 View FIGURE 1 G); bothridial setae (bo) with slightly haired bases.................................................................................................... B. innuba (Livshitz, 1973)

- Striation subtype “Biparalorryia” ( Figure 1 View FIGURE 1 D); bothridial setae (bo) completely smooth............. B. carya ( Baker, 1968)

66. Distance between setae h1 (78) much longer than distance f1-f1 (ca 50); solenidion ωII stick-like, 4.4 long; solenidion ω I straight; dorsal idiosomal setae plumose , about 20–24 hairs set in one longitudinal row along main setal axis; striation subtype “Biparalorryia”................................................................ B. nobila (Kaźmierski, 1998)

- Distance h1-h1 more or less equal in length with f1-f1; solenidion ωII sphere-shaped, very short (1–1.2); solenidion ωI bent; dorsal setae with sharp teeth, but not plumose , about 10–12 teeth in one row along main setal axis; striation subtype “Biparalorryia-incerta”....................................................................................... 67

67. Claws (ol) with pilose ventral edges; setal serrations long: distinctly longer than setal stem; cheliceral stilettos (ca 29) much longer than palptarsus (ca 19); seta ft ’ (ca 24) on tarsus I only slightly shorter than ft ’’ζ (ca 31)................................................................................................. .. B. draciformis (Kaźmierski, 1998)

- Claws (ol) nude; setal serrations triangular, not long: shorter than setal stem; cheliceral stilettos approximately as long as palptarsus (ca 20); seta ft ’ as long as 1/2 length of ft ’’ζ............................... B. scabriseta (Kuznetzov, 1972)

68. Striation subtype “Paravenilia” ( Figure 1 View FIGURE 1 I)................................................................. 69

- Striation subtype “ Paralorryia s. str ” or “Paralorryia-incerta” ( Figure 1 View FIGURE 1 C, F)...................................... 70

69. Dorsal surface of aspidosoma completely covered with longitudinal striation; dorsal setae only delicately serrated; setae ps1 as long as the longest opisthosomal setae; setae u ’’ on tarsus I well developed: stout and thicker than the remaining tarsal setae......................................................................... B. bakeri (Zaher & El Bagoury, 1981)

- Anterior dorsal surface of aspidosoma covered with transverse striae; dorsal setae strongly serrated; setae ps1 shortest of the opisthosomal setae; seta u’’ normally developed and similar to u’......................... B. matador Kaźmierski, 2008

70. Ornamentation with reticulate elements................................................................... 71

- Ornamentation without reticulate elements................................................................. 77

71. Reticulate elements on aspidosoma and opisthosoma......................................................... 72

- Reticulate elements limited to AA0 on aspidosoma only...................................................... 73

72. Palptarsus eupathidium (p’ζ) as long as palptarsus; ventrally, between setae mt, striation “V”-shaped................................................................................... B. reticuloinsignia ( Kaźmierski & Panou, 1997)

- Palptarsus eupathidium (p’ζ) shorter than palptarsus; ventrally, between setae mt, striation almost transverse................................................................................ B. alykaenae ( Panou & Emmanouel, 1996)

73. Cheliceral stilettos as long as palptarsus together with (p’ζ)...................................................74

- Cheliceral stilettos shorter than total length of palptarsus and (p’ζ).............................................. 75

74. Ventral striae longitudinal between setae mt; solenidion ωI longer than width of tarsus I; dorsal idiosomal setae relatively short: 14–16 (with exception of shorter ps1); Body length (female): ca 310......................... B. insignia (Livshitz, 1973)

- Ventral striae between setae mt arranged in a “V” shape; Solenidion ωI slightly longer than 1/2 width of tarsus I; Dorsal setae longer: 19–24 (setae ps1: ca 15); Body length (female): 340–415................... B. grandiinsignia ( Kaźmierski, 1991)

75. Palptarsus and its terminal eupathidium (p’ζ) equal in length.............................. B. unigena (Livshitz, 1973) junior synonym: Tydeus octomaculatus Momen & Lundqvist, 1995

- Palptarsus longer than its terminal eupathidium............................................................. 76

76. Serrations of idiosomal dorsal setae triangular and short: distinctly shorter than the width of stem of seta; length of dorsal setae: 22–24; ratio of length to width of palptarsus ca 5:2; striation subtype “Paralorryia-incerta”; body length of female: ca 375............................................................................. B. nuncia (Livshitz, 1973)

- Serrations of idiosomal dorsal setae much longer, sharp: not shorter than width of stem of seta; length of dorsal setae: 12–16; ratio of length to width of palp tarsus ca 7:2; striation subtype “ Paralorryia s. str. ”; Body length of female: ca 275.......................................................................................... B. lena (Kuznetzov, 1973)

77. Gnathosoma visible from above; striation subtype “Paralorryia-incerta”; dorsal idiosomal setae smooth and unequal in shape: aspidosomal setae pointed, opisthosomal setae blunt; setae f2, h1, h2 and ps1 almost club-like, rounded distally............................................................................ B. vinea (Ueckermann & Smith Meyer, 1979)

- Gnathosoma hidden under aspidosoma; striation subtype “ Paralorryia s. str. ”; dorsal idiosomal setae not smooth, subequal in shape and all sharp distally............................................................................. 78

78. Dorsal idiosomal setae straight, relatively long: f1 longer than distance between f1 and h1; c1 longer than 1/2 length of distance c1-c1; d1 longer than 1/2 distance d1-d1; f1 longer than 1/2 distance f1-f1; h1 subequal in length with h1-h1 distance.......

................................................................................. B. mansoni ( Baker, 1968) - Dorsal idiosomal setae slightly bent and shorter: f1 not longer than distance f1-h1; setae c1, d1, f1 and h1 not longer than 1/2 distance between two “sister” setae, respectively............................................................ 79

79. Anterior part of aspidosoma with transverse striae, i.e. parallel to anterior aspidosomal projection..................... 80

- Entire surface of aspidosoma (jointly with its anterior part) longitudinally striated.................................81

80. Dorsal idiosomal setae relatively short (14–18); solenidion ωI (ca 9) longer than half width of tarsus I; distance h1-h1 longer than d1-d1 and c1-c1............................................................ B. flamma (Kuznetzov, 1973)

- Dorsal idiosomal setae longer (23–26); solenidion ωI shorter (ca 6), equals to half width of tarsus I; distance h1-h1 shorter than d1-d1 and c1-c1 ................................................................ B. fernando Kaźmierski, 2008

81. Dorsal idiosomal setae of medium length: longer than width of leg segments; solenidion ωI much shorter than width of tarsus I......................................................................... B. chapultepecensis ( Baker, 1943)

- Dorsal idiosomal setae very short: shorter than width of leg segments; solenidion ωI as long as width of tarsus I.......................................................................................... B. stegmaieri ( Baker, 1968)

82. Reticulation forms a single, longitudinally elongated area in centre of aspidosoma, between setae ro, la and bothridial setae (bo)................................................................. B. fabae (El Bagoury & Momen, 1988)

- No reticulation present................................................................................83

83. Gnathosoma visible dorsally............................................................................ 84

- Gnathosoma concealed dorsally (covered by aspidosoma).....................................................87

84. Dorsal idiosomal setae serrated; bothridial setae (bo) simple, stiff and blunt; palptarsus eupathidium (p’ζ) blade-like................................................................................. B. brusti ( Momen & Sinha, 1991)

- Dorsal idiosomal setae smooth; bothridial setae (bo) smooth and flabby, filiform, or expanded and furcated distally; tarsal eupathidium (p’ζ) blade-like or “T” shaped distally.......................................................... 85

85. Palpal eupathidium “T”-shaped distally................................ B. vianensis ( Khanjani & Ueckermann, 2003)

- Palpal eupathidium (pζ) blade-like....................................................................... 86

86. Bothridial setae filiform, about four times as long as remaining aspidosomal setae; all dorsal setae similar in shape, spike-like; palpal eupathidium (p’ζ) uniformly narrow and subequal in length to palptarsus; striation subtype “Biparalorryia”........................................................................... B. artichokei (El Bagoury & Momen, 1989)

- Bothridial setae expanded and trifurcated distally; dorsal idiosomal setae unequal in shape: setae f1, f2, h1, h2 and ps1 expanded distally and blunt, other setae tapered; palptarsus eupathidium thickened for three fourths of its length and becoming narrow at tip, twice as long as palptarsus; striation subtype “Paravenilia”..... B. furcata (Ueckermann & Smith Meyer, 1979)

87. Palptarsus (ca 20) longer than its terminal eupathidium (ca 14); dorsal idiosomal setae sickle-like, bent, 22–25 long; setae bo no more than two times longer than other dorsal setae................................ B. latiuscula (Kuznetzov, 1972)

- Palptarsus not longer than its eupathidium (ca 14); dorsal setae not bent, 17–18 long; bothridial setae (bo) more than three times longer than other dorsal setae................................................... B. nasata ( Schiess, 1981)

88. Striation subtype “Paralorryia-incerta”, “ Paralorryia s. str., “Veniparalorryia” or “Paravenilia”........................89

- Striation subtype “Mesoparalorryia” or “Mesoparalorryia-incerta” (transverse striae between setae d1) ( Figure 1 View FIGURE 1 B, E)....146

89. Dorsal ornamentation with reticulate elements..............................................................90

- Dorsal ornamentation without reticulate elements.......................................................... 127

90. Reticulate elements on aspidosoma and opisthosoma, or on opisthosoma only..................................... 91

- Reticulate elements on aspidosoma only................................................................. 110

91. Dorsal posterior part of opisthosoma with large reticulate area A(h2)(h1)(ps1).................................... 92

- A(h2)(h1)(ps1) absent................................................................................ 106

92. Aspidosoma without reticulum; dorsal setae rod-like, blunt, slightly serrated, approximately as long as 1/2 distance between their bases................................................................... B. argentinensis ( Baker, 1968)

- Aspidosoma with reticulate elements; dorsal setae variable in shape and length.................................... 93

93. Aspidosomal reticulum limited to AA0, thus, no aspidosomal setae inserted in reticulated area.......................94

- Aspidosomal reticulum with multiple elements, or if with one element only, then with two pairs of setae inserted in it.....97

94. Besides AA0 and A(h2)(h1)(ps1) reticulate ornamentation forms a small regions: A0[c2], A[c2]0, A e1, A e1, A f1, A f1, A f2, A f2; dorsal idiosomal setae short, narrowed distally but not sharp, with blunt scale-shaped serrations................................................................................................... B. fibra (Kuznetzov, 1975)

– AA0 and A(h2)(h1)(ps1) occur only...................................................................... 95

95. Dorsal idiosomal setae long: longer than distance between their bases and longer than bothridial setae (bo); solenidion ωI long: about as long as width of segment.................................................... B. sapodilla ( Baker, 1968)

- Dorsal idiosomal setae not so long: shorter than the distance between their bases (with exception of h1, h2 and ps1) and shorter than bothridial setae; solenidion ωI shorter than the width of segment...........................................96

96. Dorsal idiosomal setae serrate and sharp distally; solenidion ωI not as long as 1/2 width of segment; empodia with hooks (om)............................................................................. B. peruviensis ( Baker, 1968)

- Dorsal idiosomal setae smooth and blunt distally; solenidion ωI longer than 1/2 width of segment; empodia without hooks (om).......................................................................... B. parafibra (Momen, 1988)

97. Dorsal idiosomal seta very delicately serrated and blunt: rounded distally; meshes of reticulation between setae ro and bo elon- gated longitudinally...................................................................................98

- Dorsal setae strongly haired and pointed; aspidosomal meshes about as long as broad, polygonal......................99

98. Setae la lie outside reticulate area (thus with A(ro)(bo )); setae ps1 situated dorsally; dorsal idiosomal setae long: distinctly lon- ger than 1/2 length of bothridial setae; setae f1 longer than distance f1-h1; empodial hooks (om) present..................

................................................................................ B. mexicana ( Baker, 1968) - Setae la lie on the verge of reticulate area, but not outside it (thus with A(ro)(la)(bo )); setae ps1 situated terminally; dorsal idiosomal setae shorter: about as long as 1/2 length of (bo); setae f1 slightly shorter than distance f1-h1; empodial hooks absent................................................................................... B. berryi ( Baker, 1968)

99. Reticulation limited to A(ro)(la)(bo) and A(h1)(h2)(ps1) only................................................. 100

- A few reticulate elements around setae f1 and f 2 in addition to A(ro)(la)(bo) and A(h1)(h2)(ps1)..................... 101

100. Idiosomal length 380–400, width 260–300; palptibia setae unequal in length: t ’ two times longer than t ’’; dorsal idiosomal setae covered with hairs a few times longer than the width of setal stem; setae f1 subequal in length to 1/2 distance f1-h1 ............................................................................. B. jesionowskii (Kaźmierski, 1998)

- Idiosomal length 290–300, width 170–210; palptibia setae subequal in length; dorsal idiosomal setae with short hairs; setae f1 nearly as long as f1-h1 distance................................................. B. nesziyyonensis ( Gerson, 1968)

101. Empodial hooks (om) absent; dorsal idiosomal setae with sparsely distributed hairs; three reticulate areas on aspidosoma:

A(ro)(la)(bo) and two smaller areas A, A opisthosoma with three reticulate areas: very small A e1, A e1 and vast A(h2)(h1)(ps1) or A(ro) (la) (bo), A(f1, f2) and A(h2)(h1)(ps1); setae ps1 situated on dorsal side.................... 102 - Empodial hooks present; dorsal setae densely haired; somewhat different arrangement of reticulate regions; setae ps1 situated terminally or on ventral side........................................................................... 104

102. No reticulate area on A(f1, f2); dorsal setae slightly serrated; solenidion (ωI) more than 1/2 width of segment................................................................................ B. aegyptiaca (Rasmy & El Bagoury, 1979)

- Reticulate area on A(f1, f2); dorsal setae smooth; solenidion (ωI) shorter than or equal to the width of tarsus I.......... 103

103. Reticulate area on aspidosoma and around setae ro, la and bo; all dorsal setae not broadly lanceolate but with longitudinal groove............................................................... .. B. scutatus Silva, Rocha & Ferla 2013

- Reticulate area on the aspidosoma and only nearby of setae bo; all dorsal setae club-shaped, without longitudinal groove............................................................................. B. lorenzatus Silva & Ferla (2016)

104. Gnathosoma completely hidden under aspidosoma; setae ro (ca 18) shorter than la and distinctly shorter than remaining dorsal setae........................................................................ B. concinna (Oudemans, 1929)

- Gnathosoma visible from above; setae ro longer than la and indistinctly shorter than remaining setae................. 105

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Arachnida

Order

Prostigmata

SubOrder

Prostigmata

Family

Tydeidae

Genus

Tydides

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Arachnida

Order

Prostigmata

SubOrder

Prostigmata

Family

Tydeidae

Genus

Tydides

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Arachnida

Order

Prostigmata

SubOrder

Prostigmata

Family

Tydeidae

Genus

Brachytydeus

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Arachnida

Order

Prostigmata

SubOrder

Prostigmata

Family

Tydeidae

Genus

Brachytydeus

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Arachnida

Order

Prostigmata

SubOrder

Prostigmata

Family

Tydeidae

Genus

Brachytydeus

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Arachnida

Order

Prostigmata

SubOrder

Prostigmata

Family

Tydeidae

Genus

Brachytydeus

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Arachnida

Order

Prostigmata

SubOrder

Prostigmata

Family

Tydeidae

Genus

Brachytydeus

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Arachnida

Order

Prostigmata

SubOrder

Prostigmata

Family

Tydeidae

Genus

Brachytydeus

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Arachnida

Order

Prostigmata

SubOrder

Prostigmata

Family

Tydeidae

Genus

Brachytydeus

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Arachnida

Order

Prostigmata

SubOrder

Prostigmata

Family

Tydeidae

Genus

Brachytydeus

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Arachnida

Order

Prostigmata

SubOrder

Prostigmata

Family

Tydeidae

Genus

Brachytydeus

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Arachnida

Order

Prostigmata

SubOrder

Prostigmata

Family

Tydeidae

Genus

Brachytydeus

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Arachnida

Order

Prostigmata

SubOrder

Prostigmata

Family

Tydeidae

Genus

Brachytydeus

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Arachnida

Order

Prostigmata

SubOrder

Prostigmata

Family

Tydeidae

Genus

Brachytydeus

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Arachnida

Order

Prostigmata

SubOrder

Prostigmata

Family

Tydeidae

Genus

Brachytydeus

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Arachnida

Order

Prostigmata

SubOrder

Prostigmata

Family

Tydeidae

Genus

Brachytydeus

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Arachnida

Order

Prostigmata

SubOrder

Prostigmata

Family

Tydeidae

Genus

Brachytydeus

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Arachnida

Order

Prostigmata

SubOrder

Prostigmata

Family

Tydeidae

Genus

Brachytydeus

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Arachnida

Order

Prostigmata

SubOrder

Prostigmata

Family

Tydeidae

Genus

Paralorryia

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Arachnida

Order

Prostigmata

SubOrder

Prostigmata

Family

Tydeidae

Genus

Brachytydeus

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Arachnida

Order

Prostigmata

SubOrder

Prostigmata

Family

Tydeidae

Genus

Brachytydeus

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Arachnida

Order

Prostigmata

SubOrder

Prostigmata

Family

Tydeidae

Genus

Brachytydeus

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Arachnida

Order

Prostigmata

SubOrder

Prostigmata

Family

Tydeidae

Genus

Brachytydeus

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Arachnida

Order

Prostigmata

SubOrder

Prostigmata

Family

Tydeidae

Genus

Brachytydeus

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Arachnida

Order

Prostigmata

SubOrder

Prostigmata

Family

Tydeidae

Genus

Brachytydeus

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Arachnida

Order

Prostigmata

SubOrder

Prostigmata

Family

Tydeidae

Genus

Brachytydeus

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Arachnida

Order

Prostigmata

SubOrder

Prostigmata

Family

Tydeidae

Genus

Brachytydeus

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Arachnida

Order

Prostigmata

SubOrder

Prostigmata

Family

Tydeidae

Genus

Brachytydeus

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Arachnida

Order

Prostigmata

SubOrder

Prostigmata

Family

Tydeidae

Genus

Brachytydeus

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Arachnida

Order

Prostigmata

SubOrder

Prostigmata

Family

Tydeidae

Genus

Brachytydeus

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Arachnida

Order

Prostigmata

SubOrder

Prostigmata

Family

Tydeidae

Genus

Brachytydeus

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Arachnida

Order

Prostigmata

SubOrder

Prostigmata

Family

Tydeidae

Genus

Pseudolorryia

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Arachnida

Order

Prostigmata

SubOrder

Prostigmata

Family

Tydeidae

Genus

Brachytydeus

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Arachnida

Order

Prostigmata

SubOrder

Prostigmata

Family

Tydeidae

Genus

Brachytydeus

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Arachnida

Order

Prostigmata

SubOrder

Prostigmata

Family

Tydeidae

Genus

Brachytydeus

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Arachnida

Order

Prostigmata

SubOrder

Prostigmata

Family

Tydeidae

Genus

Tydides

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Arachnida

Order

Prostigmata

SubOrder

Prostigmata

Family

Tydeidae

Genus

Brachytydeus

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Arachnida

Order

Prostigmata

SubOrder

Prostigmata

Family

Tydeidae

Genus

Brachytydeus

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Arachnida

Order

Prostigmata

SubOrder

Prostigmata

Family

Tydeidae

Genus

Brachytydeus

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Arachnida

Order

Prostigmata

SubOrder

Prostigmata

Family

Tydeidae

Genus

Brachytydeus

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Arachnida

Order

Prostigmata

SubOrder

Prostigmata

Family

Tydeidae

Genus

Brachytydeus

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Arachnida

Order

Prostigmata

SubOrder

Prostigmata

Family

Tydeidae

Genus

Raphitydeus

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Arachnida

Order

Prostigmata

SubOrder

Prostigmata

Family

Tydeidae

Genus

Brachytydeus

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Arachnida

Order

Prostigmata

SubOrder

Prostigmata

Family

Tydeidae

Genus

Brachytydeus

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Arachnida

Order

Prostigmata

SubOrder

Prostigmata

Family

Tydeidae

Genus

Brachytydeus

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Arachnida

Order

Prostigmata

SubOrder

Prostigmata

Family

Tydeidae

Genus

Brachytydeus

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Arachnida

Order

Prostigmata

SubOrder

Prostigmata

Family

Tydeidae

Genus

Brachytydeus

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Arachnida

Order

Prostigmata

SubOrder

Prostigmata

Family

Tydeidae

Genus

Brachytydeus

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Arachnida

Order

Prostigmata

SubOrder

Prostigmata

Family

Tydeidae

Genus

Brachytydeus

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Arachnida

Order

Prostigmata

SubOrder

Prostigmata

Family

Tydeidae

Genus

Brachytydeus

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Arachnida

Order

Prostigmata

SubOrder

Prostigmata

Family

Tydeidae

Genus

Brachytydeus

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Arachnida

Order

Prostigmata

SubOrder

Prostigmata

Family

Tydeidae

Genus

Brachytydeus

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Arachnida

Order

Prostigmata

SubOrder

Prostigmata

Family

Tydeidae

Genus

Brachytydeus

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Arachnida

Order

Prostigmata

SubOrder

Prostigmata

Family

Tydeidae

Genus

Brachytydeus

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Arachnida

Order

Prostigmata

SubOrder

Prostigmata

Family

Tydeidae

Genus

Tydides

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Arachnida

Order

Prostigmata

SubOrder

Prostigmata

Family

Tydeidae

Genus

Tydides

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Arachnida

Order

Prostigmata

SubOrder

Prostigmata

Family

Tydeidae

Genus

Brachytydeus

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Arachnida

Order

Prostigmata

SubOrder

Prostigmata

Family

Tydeidae

Genus

Tydides

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Arachnida

Order

Prostigmata

SubOrder

Prostigmata

Family

Tydeidae

Genus

Tydides

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Arachnida

Order

Prostigmata

SubOrder

Prostigmata

Family

Tydeidae

Genus

Tydides

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Arachnida

Order

Prostigmata

SubOrder

Prostigmata

Family

Tydeidae

Genus

Brachytydeus

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Arachnida

Order

Prostigmata

SubOrder

Prostigmata

Family

Tydeidae

Genus

Brachytydeus

Kingdom

Plantae

Phylum

Tracheophyta

Class

Magnoliopsida

Order

Asterales

SubOrder

Prostigmata

Family

Asteraceae

Genus

Stoebe

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Arachnida

Order

Prostigmata

SubOrder

Prostigmata

Family

Tydeidae

Genus

Brachytydeus

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Arachnida

Order

Prostigmata

SubOrder

Prostigmata

Family

Tydeidae

Genus

Brachytydeus

Kingdom

Plantae

Phylum

Tracheophyta

Class

Magnoliopsida

Order

Asterales

SubOrder

Prostigmata

Family

Asteraceae

Genus

Stoebe

Kingdom

Plantae

Phylum

Tracheophyta

Class

Magnoliopsida

Order

Asterales

SubOrder

Prostigmata

Family

Asteraceae

Genus

Stoebe

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Arachnida

Order

Prostigmata

SubOrder

Prostigmata

Family

Tydeidae

Genus

Brachytydeus

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Arachnida

Order

Prostigmata

SubOrder

Prostigmata

Family

Tydeidae

Genus

Brachytydeus

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Arachnida

Order

Prostigmata

SubOrder

Prostigmata

Family

Tydeidae

Genus

Tydides

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Arachnida

Order

Prostigmata

SubOrder

Prostigmata

Family

Tydeidae

Genus

Brachytydeus

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Arachnida

Order

Prostigmata

SubOrder

Prostigmata

Family

Tydeidae

Genus

Brachytydeus

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Arachnida

Order

Prostigmata

SubOrder

Prostigmata

Family

Tydeidae

Genus

Brachytydeus

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Arachnida

Order

Prostigmata

SubOrder

Prostigmata

Family

Tydeidae

Genus

Brachytydeus

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Arachnida

Order

Prostigmata

SubOrder

Prostigmata

Family

Tydeidae

Genus

Brachytydeus

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Arachnida

Order

Prostigmata

SubOrder

Prostigmata

Family

Tydeidae

Genus

Brachytydeus

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Arachnida

Order

Prostigmata

SubOrder

Prostigmata

Family

Tydeidae

Genus

Brachytydeus

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Arachnida

Order

Prostigmata

SubOrder

Prostigmata

Family

Tydeidae

Genus

Brachytydeus

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Arachnida

Order

Prostigmata

SubOrder

Prostigmata

Family

Tydeidae

Genus

Tydides

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Arachnida

Order

Prostigmata

SubOrder

Prostigmata

Family

Tydeidae

Genus

Brachytydeus

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Arachnida

Order

Prostigmata

SubOrder

Prostigmata

Family

Tydeidae

Genus

Tydides

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Arachnida

Order

Prostigmata

SubOrder

Prostigmata

Family

Tydeidae

Genus

Brachytydeus

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Arachnida

Order

Prostigmata

SubOrder

Prostigmata

Family

Tydeidae

Genus

Brachytydeus

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Arachnida

Order

Prostigmata

SubOrder

Prostigmata

Family

Tydeidae

Genus

Brachytydeus

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Arachnida

Order

Prostigmata

SubOrder

Prostigmata

Family

Tydeidae

Genus

Paralorryia

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Arachnida

Order

Prostigmata

SubOrder

Prostigmata

Family

Tydeidae

Genus

Brachytydeus

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Arachnida

Order

Prostigmata

SubOrder

Prostigmata

Family

Tydeidae

Genus

Brachytydeus

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Arachnida

Order

Prostigmata

SubOrder

Prostigmata

Family

Tydeidae

Genus

Brachytydeus

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Arachnida

Order

Prostigmata

SubOrder

Prostigmata

Family

Tydeidae

Genus

Brachytydeus

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Arachnida

Order

Prostigmata

SubOrder

Prostigmata

Family

Tydeidae

Genus

Brachytydeus

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Arachnida

Order

Prostigmata

SubOrder

Prostigmata

Family

Tydeidae

Genus

Brachytydeus

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Arachnida

Order

Prostigmata

SubOrder

Prostigmata

Family

Tydeidae

Genus

Brachytydeus

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Arachnida

Order

Prostigmata

SubOrder

Prostigmata

Family

Tydeidae

Genus

Brachytydeus

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Arachnida

Order

Prostigmata

SubOrder

Prostigmata

Family

Tydeidae

Genus

Tydides

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Arachnida

Order

Prostigmata

SubOrder

Prostigmata

Family

Tydeidae

Genus

Tydeus

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Arachnida

Order

Prostigmata

SubOrder

Prostigmata

Family

Tydeidae

Genus

Brachytydeus

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Arachnida

Order

Prostigmata

SubOrder

Prostigmata

Family

Tydeidae

Genus

Brachytydeus

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Arachnida

Order

Prostigmata

SubOrder

Prostigmata

Family

Tydeidae

Genus

Lorryia

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Arachnida

Order

Prostigmata

SubOrder

Prostigmata

Family

Tydeidae

Genus

Brachytydeus

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Arachnida

Order

Prostigmata

SubOrder

Prostigmata

Family

Tydeidae

Genus

Brachytydeus

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Arachnida

Order

Prostigmata

SubOrder

Prostigmata

Family

Tydeidae

Genus

Brachytydeus

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Arachnida

Order

Prostigmata

SubOrder

Prostigmata

Family

Tydeidae

Genus

Brachytydeus

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Arachnida

Order

Prostigmata

SubOrder

Prostigmata

Family

Tydeidae

Genus

Neoapolorryia

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Arachnida

Order

Prostigmata

SubOrder

Prostigmata

Family

Tydeidae

Genus

Brachytydeus

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Arachnida

Order

Prostigmata

SubOrder

Prostigmata

Family

Tydeidae

Genus

Brachytydeus

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Arachnida

Order

Prostigmata

SubOrder

Prostigmata

Family

Tydeidae

Genus

Brachytydeus

GBIF Dataset (for parent article) Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF