Icius kulakangri, Yang & Zhang, 2024
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5447.2.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:478235E5-DAA2-4524-A247-7EBA4EE56CCB |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.11122811 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/D55287B7-E46E-D86F-FF7F-FF7BFDD1F84B |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Icius kulakangri |
status |
sp. nov. |
Icius kulakangri sp. nov. (NJËÑƋ伊ø)
Figs 5, 7 View FIGURES 2–7 , 92–115 View FIGURES 92–96 View FIGURES 97–106 View FIGURES 107–112 View FIGURES 113–115
Type material. Holotype: ♂ (MHBU-ARA-00026556), CHINA: Xizang Autonomous Region, Shannan City , Lhozhag County (ăü县), Lhozhag Town (ăüā), Panarin Temple (ñaeöȕ), 28.3848°N, 90.8631°E, 3914 m a.s.l., 23 July 2023, leg. Y. Hou, Z. Yang, Y. Ni & Y. Badan. GoogleMaps Paratypes: 1♂ 2♀ (MHBU-ARA-00026604, MHBUARA-00026727), both with same data as the holotype GoogleMaps .
Etymology. The specific epithet is from Kula Kangri (NJËÑƋë), because the type specimens were collected from the agricultural area close to the Panarin Temple, which is situated at the base of Kula Kangri; noun in apposition.
Diagnosis. This species differs from I. faker sp. nov. in the presence of two white lateral stripes on the male dorsal abdomen, the thin embolus, the small copulatory openings and the absence of atrial ridges ( Figs 96 View FIGURES 92–96 , 97 View FIGURES 97–106 , 109–115 View FIGURES 107–112 View FIGURES 113–115 ; vs. the male dorsal abdomen with a middle foliate marking, embolus flat and wide, copulatory openings broad, and atrial ridges clearly visible in I. faker sp. nov., Figs 31 View FIGURES 28–32 , 33 View FIGURES 33–40 , 46–53 View FIGURES 41–49 View FIGURES 50–53 ). In addition, the males of the new species can be distinguished from I. zang by the slightly bent embolus ( Figs 110 View FIGURES 107–112 , 113 View FIGURES 113–115 ; vs. the embolus straight in I. zang , see Wang et al. 2024: 156, fig. 9B), and the females can be distinguished by the longer copulatory ducts and the copulatory openings obviously anterior to spermathecae ( Figs 111, 112 View FIGURES 107–112 , 114, 115 View FIGURES 113–115 ; vs. copulatory ducts shorter and copulatory openings near the spermathecae in I. zang , see Wang et al. 2024: 157, figs 10A–B). It differs from I. han sp. nov. in the slightly bent embolus, the narrower lamellar tegular process (LP), the retrolateral constriction between the posterior lobe of tegulum (PL) and tegulum not right-angled, and the smaller copulatory openings ( Figs 110, 111 View FIGURES 107–112 , 113, 114 View FIGURES 113–115 ; vs. embolus straight, LP wider, the retrolateral constriction between PL and tegulum right-angled, and the copulatory openings larger in I. han sp. nov., Figs 60, 62 View FIGURES 59–63 , 64, 66 View FIGURES 64–67 ).
Description. Male. Habitus as in Figs 92, 96 View FIGURES 92–96 , 97, 99 View FIGURES 97–106 . Measurements of holotype: carapace 1.92 long, 1.29 wide, abdomen 2.30 long, 1.52 wide; eye measurements: AME 0.30, ALE 0.18, PME 0.06, PLE 0.18; leg measurements: Ⅰ 3.37 (1.02, 0.57, 0.75, 0.45, 0.58), II 2.76 (0.87, 0.40, 0.62, 0.42, 0.45), III 3.06 (0.94, 0.43, 0.58, 0.61, 0.50), IV 3.52 (1.05, 0.42, 0.81, 0.66, 0.58); leg formula 4132. Carapace black brown, with white lateral margins and white stripe in middle ( Figs 96 View FIGURES 92–96 , 97, 99 View FIGURES 97–106 ). Abdomen dark brown, with yellowish spots in posterior half and two wide longitudinal white stripes ( Figs 96 View FIGURES 92–96 , 97 View FIGURES 97–106 ). Chelicerae black, with two promarginal and one retromarginal teeth ( Figs 103, 104 View FIGURES 97–106 ). Legs brown, leg I darker than others ( Figs 96 View FIGURES 92–96 , 97, 101 View FIGURES 97–106 ).
Palp (107–110, 113): embolus thin and moderately long, slightly bent; tegulum rough; tegular bump medio-retrolaterally located; RTA dagger-like, palp with white scales on dorsal side ( Figs 92, 96 View FIGURES 92–96 ).
Female. Habitus as in Figs 93–95 View FIGURES 92–96 , 98, 100 View FIGURES 97–106 . Measurements of paratype (one female in MHBU-ARA-00026727): carapace 2.35 long, 1.57 wide, abdomen 2.50 long, 1.74 wide; eye measurements:AME 0.36, ALE 0.26, PME 0.06, PLE 0.16; leg measurements: Ⅰ 3.56 (1.09, 0.60, 0.78, 0.54, 0.56), II 3.04 (0.93, 0.56, 0.58, 0.47, 0.50), III 3.40 (1.11, 0.48, 0.64, 0.62, 0.55), IV 4.40 (1.31, 0.59, 0.97, 1.05, 0.48); leg formula 4132. Carapace blackish-brown, with white and yellow scales ( Figs 95 View FIGURES 92–96 , 98 View FIGURES 97–106 ). Chelicerae black, with two promarginal and one retromarginal teeth ( Figs 105, 106 View FIGURES 97–106 ). Abdomen dark, with central yellowish-brown markings ( Figs 95 View FIGURES 92–96 , 98 View FIGURES 97–106 ). Legs yellow ( Figs 93–95 View FIGURES 92–96 , 102 View FIGURES 97–106 ).
Epigynum (111, 112, 114, 115): copulatory openings small, separated from each other and located anterior to spermathecae; with two pockets close to genital groove. Vulva (112, 115): copulatory ducts linear, accessory glands not obvious, spermathecae small, fertilization ducts at anterior region of spermathecae.
Natural history. Rock-dwellers, with nest aggregations ( Figs 5, 7 View FIGURES 2–7 )
Distribution. China (Xizang) ( Fig. 1 View FIGURE 1 ).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |