Buccinidae
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5852/ejt.2021.785.1605 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:8B61E9CD-DDCA-43FC-AB0A-B227C1A579E8 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5837794 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/D63CF03C-C340-FFDF-8E8D-F8800F4DFC1F |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Buccinidae |
status |
|
Key to species of Buccinidae View in CoL and Colidae found in the GB (see also Bouchet & Warén 1985)
1. Sculpture conspicuous, with definite spiral ridges ........................................................................... 2
– Sculpture attenuated, consisting only of fine spiral grooves ............................................................ 3
2. Sculpture mostly spiral, shell commonly> 5 cm ............................................................................... ........................................................................... Troschelia berniciensis (King, 1846) ( Fig. 23J–K View Fig )
– Sculpture with conspicuous knobs along the periphery ..................................................................... .................................................................................. Kryptos koehleri (Locard, 1896) ( Fig. 23L–M View Fig )
3. Protoconch of little more than 1 whorl, with a large nucleus ............................................................. .................................................................................... Colus gracilis (da Costa, 1778) ( Fig. 24A–G View Fig )
– Protoconch of more than 2 whorls, with a small nucleus ................................................................... .......................................................................... Colus jeffreysianus (P. Fischer, 1868) ( Fig. 24H–K View Fig )
Remarks
There are two species of Colus Röding, 1798 to be found on GB ( Fig. 24 View Fig ), and their correct identification is crucial since they are an important component of the benthic community and food chain. Both have extremely similar shells and their accurate identification relies essentially on the diagnostic character of the protoconch. Colus gracilis is found on the summit platform and the adult is somewhat larger and more solid, whereas C. jeffreysianus has a broad distribution on the deeper part of the slope. Colus aurariae Fraussen, Rosado, Afonso & Monteiro, 2009 , described from off Portugal in 200–500 m depth, differs from C. gracilis in having both early whorls and siphonal canal more stretched out; it was not found on GB.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
SubClass |
Caenogastropoda |
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |