Thylamyini Hershkovitz, 1992
publication ID |
0003-0090 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/DA1387CE-C971-585E-FF12-F74F94E4F1A0 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Thylamyini Hershkovitz, 1992 |
status |
|
Tribe Thylamyini Hershkovitz, 1992
CONTENTS: Chacodelphys , Cryptonanus , Gracilinanus , Lestodelphys , Marmosops , and Thylamys .
DIAGNOSIS: Members of the tribe Thylamyini differ from all other didelphids by having a fenestra in the parietal-squamosal suture through which the petrosal is visible on the lateral surface of the braincase. Additionally, most thylamyines ( Chacodelphys and Cryptonanus are exceptions) differ from otherwise similar marmosines by having a secondary foramen ovale formed by an anteromedial bullar process that spans the transverse canal foramen.
REMARKS: The monophyly of Thylamyini (without Chacodelphys , from which sequence data are unavailable) is strongly supported by parsimony, likelihood, and Bayesian analyses of IRBP (fig. 28) and BRCA1 (fig. 31); by likelihood and Bayesian analyses of DMP1 (fig. 29); and by Bayesian analysis of RAG1 (fig. 30). It is also strongly supported by all analyses of a concatenated five-gene dataset (fig. 33), and by Bayesian analysis of a combined (nonmolecular + molecular) dataset that includes Chacodelphys . The presence of a fenestra in the parietal-squamosal suture (appendix 5) and a uniquely derived insertion at the BRCA1 locus (fig. 31) both optimize as thylamyine synapomorphies.
Apparently, the earliest family-group name based on Thylamys is technically available from Hershkovitz (1992b), who erroneously attributed authorship of Thylamyinae to Reig et al. (1987).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.