Acanthoscurria armasi, Sherwood & Gabriel & Peñaherrera-R & García, 2025
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5563.1.16 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:EFC73DF8-B35C-4A1A-BB6C-E2166B770910 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.14596745 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/DA3787AF-FF97-F317-4FC1-984B0E81FE72 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Acanthoscurria armasi |
status |
sp. nov. |
Acanthoscurria armasi sp. nov.
( Figs 1–2 View FIGURE 1 View FIGURE 2 , 5A–B View FIGURE 5 )
Type material. Holotype ♂ ( AMNH _ IZC00357351 About AMNH ), Río Suarez , Colombia, 800–1000 m, 11–17 August 1946, en la selva.
Diagnosis. Acanthoscurria armasi sp. nov. ( Figs 1–2 View FIGURE 1 View FIGURE 2 , 5A – B View FIGURE 5 ) is closely related to other species of the theraphosoides species-group ( A. insubtilis , Figs 3 View FIGURE 3 , 5C–D View FIGURE 5 , and A. theraphosoides , Figs 4 View FIGURE 4 , 5E–F View FIGURE 5 ). Males of A. armasi sp. nov. differ from A. theraphosoides by having a developed PS ( Fig. 1B View FIGURE 1 , vs. Fig. 4B View FIGURE 4 ), developed basal (disjunct) section of the first PAIK with more curvature ( Figs 1A–D View FIGURE 1 vs. Figs 4A–D View FIGURE 4 ), second PAIK ventrally positioned ( Figs 1A–D View FIGURE 1 vs. Figs 4A–D View FIGURE 4 ), first PAIK without weakly developed KA ( Fig. 1E View FIGURE 1 vs. Fig. 4E View FIGURE 4 ), and well-developed, straight, PA ( Figs 1A–B View FIGURE 1 vs. Figs 4A–B View FIGURE 4 ) (weakly developed PS, weakly developed basal (disjunct) section of the first PAIK, first PAIK with weakly developed KA and less curved, second PAIK prolaterally positioned, and developed, slightly upwardly-curved, PA in A. theraphosoides ). Acanthopalpus armasi sp. nov. can be distinguished from A. insubtilis by the absence of a PI ( Figs 1A–C View FIGURE 1 vs. Figs 3A–C View FIGURE 3 ), presence of a second PAIK ( Figs 1A–D View FIGURE 1 vs. Figs 3A–D View FIGURE 3 ), and SGA with oblique denticulate keels ( Figs 1A–E View FIGURE 1 , 4A–B View FIGURE 4 vs. Figs 3A–E View FIGURE 3 , 5C–D View FIGURE 5 ) (PI present, second PAIK absent, and SGA with longitudinal denticulate keels in A. insubtilis ); A. insubtilis further differs from both A. armasi sp. nov. and A. theraphosoides by the weakly-developed PA ( Figs 3A–B, D View FIGURE 3 vs. Figs 1A–B, D View FIGURE 1 and Figs 4A–B, D View FIGURE 4 ).
Etymology. The specific epithet is a patronym in honour of our esteemed friend and colleague Luis F. de Armas (Fundación Ariguanabo, and Instituto de Ecología y Sistemática, Cuba) in recognition of more than half a century of consistent research in arachnology, and to commemorate his 80 th birthday.
Description of holotype male. Total length including chelicerae: 38.3. Carapace: length 17.3, width 15.6 ( Fig. 2A View FIGURE 2 ). Caput: slightly raised. Ocular tubercle: raised, length 1.7, width 2.7. Eyes: AME> ALE, ALE> PLE, PLE> PME, anterior eye row procurved, posterior row slightly recurved ( Fig. 2B View FIGURE 2 ). Clypeus: narrow; clypeal fringe: long. Fovea: deep, transverse. Chelicera: length 5.9, width 3.3. Abdomen: length 15.1, width 9.6. Maxilla with 80–90 cuspules covering approximately 49% of the proximal edge; prolateral heel accentuated. Labium: length 1.6, width 2.0, with 70–80 cuspules most separated by 0.5–1.0 times the width of a single cuspule ( Fig. 2C View FIGURE 2 ). Labiosternal mounds: separate. Sternum: length 7.2, width 4.6, with three pairs of sigilla. Tarsi I–IV fully scopulate. Metatarsal scopulae: I 78%; II 78%; III 45%; IV 27%. Lengths of legs and palpal segments: see table 1, legs 4,1,2,3. Spination: femur II d 0–0–1, III d 0–1–0, IV d 0–0–1, tibia II v 1–0–2, III v 0–0–2, IV d 2–0–2, v 2–2–4, metatarsus I v 0–0–1 (apical), II v 0–0–3 (apical), III d 2–2–2, v 1–0–3 (apical), IV d 2–0–2–, v 3–4–6 (3 apical). Tibia I with single branched apophysis ( Figs 1F–H View FIGURE 1 ). Femur III: slightly incrassate. Palpal tibia: strongly incrassate, with elongate and forward-pointing digitiform retrolateral apophysis present ( Figs 1I–J View FIGURE 1 ). Metatarsus I: slightly curved [inwards]. Posterior lateral spinnerets with three segments, basal 2.2, median 1.4, digitiform apical 2.4. Posterior median spinnerets with one segment. Palpal bulb with digitiform and well-developed TA; medially enlarged embolus, apically tapering; PS developed and restricted to basal section of embolus; first PAIK keel developed and disjunct with developed basal section; second PAIK keel weakly developed and ventrally positioned; A keel weakly developed; PA well-developed; SGA composed by five oblique denticulate keels; PI, RS, and RI keels absent ( Figs 1A–E View FIGURE 1 ). Urticating setae: Type I present dorsally. Stridulation organ with stridulatory setae present on retrolateral and prolateral faces of the trochanter and coxae of the palp and leg I. Colour: alcohol preserved brown ( Fig. 2D View FIGURE 2 ).
Distribution ( Figs 9–10 View FIGURE 9 View FIGURE 10 ). Acanthoscurria armasi sp. nov. is only know from its type locality (see Remarks), lower basin area of the Hoya del Río Suarez, northwestern region of the Cordillera Oriental of Colombia, in the Magdalena biogeographical province of Colombia (Santander department).
Remarks. According to the specimen label, the only geographical information on this specimen is that it was collected, in 1946, somewhere along a forest near the Río Suarez at an altitude of approximately 800–1000 m. This would at first glance represent somewhat a wide locality as this river extends throughout the Santander and Boyacá departments. However, the altitudinal range indicate with certainty that it was collected in the Santander department as this contains the only section of the Suarez River basin within this altitudinal range. In this respect we consider the following coordinates, 6.3623844 -73.3434797, as a midpoint where this species could be found within a radius of approximately 3 km from the river and an extension of 4 km to the north and south following the river, covering the provided altitudinal range.
(2000).
AMNH |
American Museum of Natural History |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.