Iteaphila

Sinclair, Bradley J. & Shamshev, Igor V., 2012, 3561, Zootaxa 3561, pp. 1-61 : 56

publication ID

048F0E79-3343-4348-895E-3B06472FC264

publication LSID

lsid:zoobank.org:pub:048F0E79-3343-4348-895E-3B06472FC264

persistent identifier

https://treatment.plazi.org/id/DA74879E-8E21-D77B-FF0D-3F5C968E8F07

treatment provided by

Felipe

scientific name

Iteaphila
status

 

Key to species of Iteaphila View in CoL View at ENA from the Nearctic Region

1 Acrostichal setulae biserial at apex of scutum, forming only two distinct rows...................................... 2

– Acrostichal setulae at least 4-serial at apex of scutum, sometimes paired row in two more widely separated rows....... 15

2 Anepisternum and anepimeron mostly bare and shining. Male terminalia subrectangular, greatly extended horizontally, longer than final three abdominal segments; epandrium expanded apically ( Fig. 8B)...................... I. nitidula Zetterstedt View in CoL

– Anepisternum and anepimeron finely pollinose. Male terminalia subtriangular, not extended horizontally, much shorter than final three abdominal segments; epandrium more or less pointed apically ( Figs. 6A, 11C)............................ 3

3 Thorax (incl. scutellum) clothed with pale setae. Abdominal setae also pale......................... I. vetula Melander View in CoL

– Thorax (incl. scutellum) and usually abdomen covered with dark setae........................................... 4

4 Males (holoptic)...................................................................................... 5

– Females (dichoptic) (Unknown for I. californica View in CoL , I. cirrata View in CoL , I. falcata View in CoL , I. sicamous View in CoL )................................. 12

5 Oblique hypoproct process absent ( Figs. 4A, B, 11C, 13B)................................................... 6

– Oblique hypoproct process present, from very short to elongate ( Figs. 4D, 6F, 8D)................................ 9

6 Proboscis very long and slender, at least 1.5 times as long as head height........................................ 7

– Proboscis shorter or only slightly longer than head height.................................................... 8

7 Apex of phallus broad, wider than postgonite with apex upturned; hypandrium with tuft of stout black setae ( Fig. 13B)...................................................................................... I. triangula (Coquillett) View in CoL

– Apex of phallus slender, parallel-sided, subequal in length to postgonite; hypandrium with setae even distributed not concentrated in a tuft ( Fig. 11C).......................................................... I. sicamous Sinclair View in CoL sp. nov.

8 Epandrium quadrate, apical third tapered with broad rounded apex; hypandrium with short setae, not longer than width of the sclerite ( Fig. 4A)................................................................ I. bulbosa Sinclair View in CoL sp. nov.

– Epandrium round, apical half strongly narrowed, tapered to slender surstylus; hypandrium with several long setae, longer than width of sclerite ( Fig. 4B)...................................................... I. californica Sinclair View in CoL sp. nov.

9 Postpedicel short, about 2–2.5 times as long as wide ( Fig. 2B). Proboscis little longer than antennae. Apex of phallus gently curved and rounded tip ( Fig. 8D)...................................................... I. pumila Sinclair View in CoL sp. nov.

– Postpedicel long, at least 3 times as long as wide. Proboscis longer than antennae. Apex of phallus sickle-shaped and pointed. ................................................................................................... 10

10 Phallus very long and coiled; epandrium with smooth, bare projecting surstylus ( Fig. 4D)...... I. cirrata Shamshev View in CoL sp. nov.

– Phallus not long and coiled; epandrium without smooth, bare projecting surstylus ( Fig. 6A, 13A)..................... 11

11 Hypoproct process long and slender, projecting free from cercus; epandrium broad, only slightly narrowed posterior ( Fig. 6A)............................................................................... I. falcata Sinclair View in CoL sp. nov.

– Hypoproct process very short, only slightly projecting free from cercus; epandrium greatly narrowed and cylindrical on posterior half ( Fig. 13A).................................................................... I. testacea Melander View in CoL

12 Proboscis very long and slender, at least 1.5 times as long as head height. Yellow coloured females with 10 or more than scutellar setae........................................................................... I. triangula (Coquillett) View in CoL

– Proboscis shorter or only slightly longer than postpedicel. Yellow coloured females with 10 or fewer scutellar bristles.... 13

13 Scutum with dense grey pollinosity when viewed anteriorly or laterally; scutellar bristles brownish not black.................................................................................................. I. bulbosa View in CoL sp. nov.

– Scutum either yellow or slight grey pollinosity; scutellar bristles black......................................... 14

14 Body often entirely yellow ( Fig. 2E), in dark forms abdomen and legs somewhat paler than thorax and “knees” usually pale. Postpedicel long, at least 3 times as long as wide............................................ I. testacea Melander View in CoL

– Body dark, including legs and abdomen. Postpedicel short, about 2–2.5 times as long as wide.... I. pumila Sinclair View in CoL sp. nov.

15 Dorsum of scutum with only minute setae in both sexes; paired rows of acrostichal setulae separated by length of setulae. Male hypoproct process very short, slightly longer than basal width ( Fig. 6F); female wing lacking veins lacking clouding............................................................................................ I. napaea Melander View in CoL

– Dorsum of scutum with abundant and long setae in male; paired rows of acrostichal setulae separated by one-quarter to onehalf length of setulae. Male hypoproct process long and slender, at least 4 times longer than basal width ( Figs. 6A, 11C); female wing veins with or without clouding.............................................................. 16

16 R 4+5 branched at or distal to end of R 2+3; female wing lacking clouding about veins. Katepisternum with shiny or polished spot on middle.......................................................................... I. orchestris Melander

– R 4+5 branched proximal to end of R 2+3; female wing with clouding about veins ( Fig. 2A). Katepisternum greyish pollinose.................................................................................... I. macquarti Zetterstedt View in CoL

Kingdom

Animalia

Phylum

Arthropoda

Class

Insecta

Order

Diptera

Family

Empididae

Darwin Core Archive (for parent article) View in SIBiLS Plain XML RDF