Isoperla phalerata, CO, 1999
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.4758579 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4759098 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/DE1AD619-FFDE-F562-CAD9-7BA7FEDE08A6 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Isoperla phalerata |
status |
|
Isoperla phalerata View in CoL .
Fifty and 28 signals were obtained from one, 1–2 day old male and female, respectively, at room temperature and normal incandescent light. The male and female produced 2-way sequenced signals and the male called with diphasic signals. The male called with 13 mode beats (12.8 ± 0.9); with intervals of 96.6 ± 16.6 ms during first phase and with 22 mode beats (22.2 ± 1.6); with 34.6 ± 5.7 ms during the second phase ( Fig. 10 View Figs , Table 3). The first phase average individual intervals decreased from 124.4 ms (i1) to 62.6 ms (i14) and the second phase gradually decreased from 51.3 ms (i1) to 31.0 (i16), then increased to 35.2 ms (i24) ( Table 4). Mode and mean number of beats per female signal were 5 and 5.0 ± 1.0; average beat interval was 109.9 ± 27.7 ms. The ♂ - ♀ exchange interval was 301.0 ± 124.0 ms.
These results for I. phalerata ( Table 3) and those from Sandberg and Stewart (2003) for I. fulva and I. mormona ( Table 6) differ considerably in overall average intervals for the same three species reported by Szczytko and Stewart (1979) ( Table 5). We propose here that their consistently smaller intervals for these three species and those of I. quinquepunctata are probably in large part due to calibration inconsistency in their oscilloscope compared with the probably more accurate calibration of our computer ( Sandberg and Stewart 2003).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |