Bombyliini, Latreille, 1802
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.1111/aen.12361 |
publication LSID |
urn:lsid:zoobank.org:pub:936DFF93-AAA3-460F-AD5D-8EC342CB3132 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5658651 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/E06587DF-5C62-FFEB-FCA1-65FBFCF63535 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Bombyliini |
status |
|
Key to Australian genera of Bombyliini View in CoL
1 M 1 ending at wing margin, cell r 5 open ............................. 2
– M 1 ending at r 5, cell r 5 closed............................................. 9
2 Palpus two-segmented......................................................... 3
– Palpus one-segmented ......................................................... 4
3 Flagellum apex truncate, with dorsal apical stylus; anterior half of scutum strongly arched; abdominal hairs uniformly yellowish, without longitudinal pale scales in middle part, hairs relatively long laterally.................................. Eusurbus View in CoL
– Flagellum apex tapering, with apical stylus; anterior half of scutum slightly arched; abdominal hairs with a remarkable black and white pattern, longitudinal pale scales present in middle part, hairs long and brush-like laterally ................................................................. Zentamyia View in CoL
4 Cell br much longer than cell bm, crossvein r-m located on apical half of cell dm ........................................................... 5
– Cell br nearly as long as cell bm, crossvein r-m located on basal half of cell dm ............................................................ 7
5 Pedicel nearly as long as width, and scape ~3.0× longer than pedicel; horizontal line dividing compound eye................................................................ Cryomyia View in CoL (part)
– Pedicel ~2.0× longer than wide, and scape less than 2.0× longer than pedicel; without horizontal line dividing compound eye............................................................................. 6
6 Pedicel 2.5× longer than wide; wing brown towards costal third; female sperm pump shorter than 1.0× length of genital fork; distal spermathecal duct longer than 2.0× of genital length; sperm bulb with apical small conical point; basal bulb absent ( Li & Yeates 2018a: fig. 50g).............................................................. Robertsmyia
– Pedicel 1.8× longer than wide; wing uniformly slightly infuscated, without distinct darker area towards costal third; female sperm pump longer than 2.5× length of genital fork, strong and sinuous; distal spermathecal duct shorter than 1.0× length of genital fork; sperm bulb flattened, apex spherical; basal bulb present ( Li & Yeates 2018a: fig. 26g).................................................................... Laurella View in CoL
7 Male eyes narrowly separated by 0.5× width of ocellus; femora thickened; pulvillus and claw enlarged, longer than distitarsus; male genitalia enlarged; female genital fork enlarged.......................................... Paramonovius View in CoL gen. nov.
– Male eyes clearly holoptic, not separated; femora not thickened; pulvillus and claw not enlarged, shorter than distitarsus; male genitalia not enlarged; female genital fork not enlarged ......................................................................... 8
8 Flagellum with subapical long hairs ( Li & Yeates 2018a: fig. 6x); labellum broad and fleshy; abdomen with median longitudinal stripe, consisting of dense, decumbent, short scales; abdominal apex without long, brush-like hairs...................................................................... Sisyromyia View in CoL
– Flagellum with subapical setae and setula ( Li & Yeates 2018a: fig. 21c) or bare ( Li & Yeates 2018a: fig. 18c); labellum thin and filiform; abdomen with median longitudinal stripe, consisting of long scales; abdominal apex with long, brush-like hairs ................................................... Dissodesma
9 Crossvein m-m much shorter than crossvein r-m, sometimes absent; M 1 + 2 present ( Li & Yeates 2018a: fig. 7m)....... 10
– Crossvein m-m nearly as long as crossvein r-m; M 1 + 2 never present ( Li & Yeates 2018a: fig. 7o) ................................ 12
10 Compound eye with horizontal line............ Cryomyia View in CoL (part)
– Compound eye without horizontal line............................. 11
11 Second flagellomere long; base of wing vein Cu bare; thoracic scutum without pale hairs on lateral margin; abdominal tergites largely yellow with black medially; female without sand chamber ...................................................... Eristalopsis View in CoL
– Second flagellomere short; base of wing vein Cu often with long hairs; thoracic scutum often with pale hairs on lateral margin; abdominal tergites blackish; female with sand chamber............................................................ Staurostichus View in CoL
12 Cell br much longer than cell bm, crossvein r-m located on middle part of cell dm .......................................... Nigromyia
– Cell br nearly as long as cell bm, crossvein r-m located on basal part of cell dm .......................................................... 13
13 Base of wing vein Cu with long hairs .............................. 14
– Base of wing vein Cu bare................................................ 15
14 Flagellum two-segmented; female eye separation less than 2.5× of ocellar tubercle width, frons normal, less than 3.5× width of frons ......................................................... Mandella View in CoL
– Flagellum one-segmented; female eye separation more than 3.5× of ocellar tubercle width, frons wide, over 3.5× width of frons................................................................... Choristus View in CoL
15 Flagellum elongate and slender; palpus short, without palpal pit; abdomen with brush-like long hairs ................ Meomyia View in CoL
– Flagellum not elongate; palpus long, with lateral palpal pit; abdomen without brush-like long hairs ........ Lambkinomyia
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.