Panjange pueh Huber
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5852/ejt.2016.184 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:AC6509DC-B848-4645-BCD9-35BF0BE263F1 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.6063206 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/792671DD-F7D9-4497-BD2B-84E925032C4C |
taxon LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:act:792671DD-F7D9-4497-BD2B-84E925032C4C |
treatment provided by |
Jeremy |
scientific name |
Panjange pueh Huber |
status |
sp. nov. |
Panjange pueh Huber View in CoL , sp. nov.
urn:lsid:zoobank.org:act:792671DD-F7D9-4497-BD2B-84E925032C4C
Figs 2 View Figs 2 – 7 , 8–9 View Figs 8 – 15 , 16–28 View Figs 16 – 20 View Figs 21 – 28 , 52–54 View Figs 52 – 60
Panjange View in CoL View at ENA Bor 96: Huber & Nuñeza 2015: 5, 43–44.
Diagnosis
Distinguished from similar species (with pair of pointed processes arising from near PME and ventral apophysis on male palpal femur: Pa. bako ; Pa. kapit sp. nov.; Pa. niah sp. nov.; Pa. sedgwicki ; Pa. tahai comb. nov.) by details of male pedipalp ( Figs 16–17 View Figs 16 – 20 ; simple conical ventral femur apophysis; distinctive prolateral membranous process on procursus; shape of procursus tip; short appendix, similar only in Pa. niah sp. nov.); from Pa. kapit sp. nov. also by shorter palpal segments and shorter epigynal scape ( Figs 17, 19 View Figs 16 – 20 ). Females are difficult to distinguish from Pa. bako and Pa. niah sp. nov. (internal transversal folds much more complex in Pa. bako , very similar in Pa. niah sp. nov.; unknown in Pa. sedgwicki ).
Etymology
Named for the type locality; noun in apposition.
Type material
MALAYSIA-BORNEO: holotype, Ƌ, Sarawak, Pueh foothills, forest along river (1.798– 1.800 ° N, 109.708– 109.718° E), 100–200 m a.s.l., 16 Jul. 2014 (B.A. Huber, S.B. Huber), ZFMK ( Ar 14575 ) GoogleMaps .
Other material examined
MALAYSIA-BORNEO, Sarawak: 3 ƋƋ, 5 ♀♀, same data as holotype, ZFMK ( Ar 14576-77 ) GoogleMaps ; 1 ♀, 3 juvs, in absolute ethanol, same data, ZFMK ( Bor 231 ) GoogleMaps .
Description
Male (holotype)
MEASUREMENTS. Total body length 5.0, carapace width 1.1. Leg 1: 44.3 (9.9 + 0.5 + 10.2 + 21.1 + 2.6), tibia 2: 6.3, tibia 3: 3.5, tibia 4: 5.8; tibia 1 L/d: 106. Distance PME–PME 490 µm, diameter PME 105 µm, distance PME–ALE ~45 µm; AME absent.
COLOR. Carapace pale ochre yellow to whitish, posterior mark ( Fig. 8 View Figs 8 – 15 ) lost in ethanol, ocular area and clypeus dark brown (black in life); sternum whitish; legs ochre-orange with dark brown patellae and tibia-metatarsus joints; abdomen ochre-gray, with black marks dorsally, monochromous ventrally.
BODY. Habitus as in Fig. 8 View Figs 8 – 15 ; ocular area raised, each triad on long stalk, with pointed straight process arising from near PME ( Figs 2 View Figs 2 – 7 , 18 View Figs 16 – 20 ); carapace without median furrow; clypeus unmodified; sternum wider than long (0.7/0.6), unmodified. Gonopore with four epiandrous spigots ( Fig. 27 View Figs 21 – 28 ). ALS as in Fig. 28 View Figs 21 – 28 .
CHELICERAE. Similar to close relatives, with proximal pair of processes and with distinctively bipartite distal apophyses ( Fig. 18 View Figs 16 – 20 ); without modified hairs; without stridulatory ridges.
PALPS. As in Figs 16–17 View Figs 16 – 20 ; coxa unmodified; trochanter with slightly curved retrolatero-ventral apophysis and low retrolateral hump; femur with conical ventral process; procursus with row of about 26 ventral ridges ( Fig. 26 View Figs 21 – 28 ), with distinctive prolateral membranous process and distal elements ( Figs 21–23 View Figs 21 – 28 ); bulb with strong proximal sclerite, short curved appendix, and proximally widened and sclerotized embolus with distal processes and fringes ( Figs 24–26 View Figs 21 – 28 ).
LEGS. Without spines and curved hairs; few vertical hairs; retrolateral trichobothrium on tibia 1 at 1.5%; prolateral trichobothrium absent on tibia 1, present on other tibiae; tarsus 1 with> 40 indistinct pseudosegments.
Variation
Tibia 1 in 3 other males: 8.9, 9.3, 9.6.
Female
In general similar to male but eye triads on low humps, much closer together (distance PME–PME 235 µm), without pointed processes. Tibia 1 in 5 females: 7.6–8.3 (mean 7.9). Epigynum weakly sclerotized plate with large weakly sclerotized posterior ‘knob’ ( Figs 19 View Figs 16 – 20 , 52 View Figs 52 – 60 ), internal arch and transversal folds visible through cuticle; internal genitalia as in Figs 20 View Figs 16 – 20 , 53–54 View Figs 52 – 60 .
Distribution
Known from type locality in Sarawak only ( Fig. 1 View Fig. 1 ).
ZFMK |
Germany, Bonn, Zoologische Forschungsinstitut und Museum "Alexander Koenig" |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.