Euophrys meridionalis, Wesołowska & Azarkina & Russell-Smith, 2014
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.3789.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:E59786FC-F821-4B2F-86AB-6C245E68ABE1 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.4914207 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/E32A8132-FF88-FFE1-FF12-F8DCC1B2FE27 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Euophrys meridionalis |
status |
sp. nov. |
Euophrys meridionalis View in CoL sp. nov.
Figs 78–86 View FIGURES 78–83 View FIGURES 84–86
Holotype: male, SOUTH AFRICA, KwaZulu-Natal Province, Royal Natal National Park , 28°41'S: 28°57'E, dry grassland, 24 April 1977, leg. A. Russell-Smith ( NHM). GoogleMaps
Paratypes: together with holotype, 1 female; same locality, riparian forest, 1 female, 21 January 2011, leg. C. Haddad ( NCA 2010 /2716); SOUTH AFRICA, KwaZulu-Natal Province, Luneburg road to Paulpietersburg, 27°20'S: 30°30'E, sifting leaf litter, bush patch, GoogleMaps 1 male, 4 females, 23 May 2012, leg. J.A. Neethling & C. Luwes ( NCA 2013 /585); Free State Province, Harrismith , Platberg Nature Reserve , 28°17'S: 29°12'E, leaf litter, dry mountain runoff (thicket), 3 males, 1 female, 12 March 2012, leg. J.A. Neethling ( NCA 2013 /580) GoogleMaps ; same data, 1 male, 13 March 2012 ( NCA 2013 /579) GoogleMaps ; same locality, dry mountain runoff ( Eucalyptus plantation), 1 female, 14 March 2012, leg. J.A. Neethling ( NCA 2013 /578); Monk’s Cowl, Drakensberg , 1465 m a.s.l., 29°01'S: 29°24'E, 1 female, afromontane forest, sifting litter, 3 November 2012, leg. J.A. Neethling ( NCA 2012 /5703) GoogleMaps .
Diagnosis. The male is easily recognized by the shape of the embolus, with a wide base and not forming a full loop. It slightly resembles E. falciger described above, but is larger and may be recognized by the lack of an outgrowth on the ventral surface of the palpal tibia and by the shorter, stouter embolus. The female has wider seminal ducts than in congeners.
Etymology. The specific name refers to the southern distribution of the species.
Description. Measurements (male/female). Cephalothorax: length 1.0/1.1–1.2, width 0.6/0.7–0.8, height 0.4/ 0.4. Abdomen: length 1.0/1.1–1.3, width 0.6/0.8–0.9. Eye field: length 0.4/0.4–0.5, anterior width 0.5/0.6–0.7, posterior width 0.6/0.7–0.8.
Male. General appearance as in Fig. 78 View FIGURES 78–83 . Very small spider. Carapace dark brown to blackish, shining, eye field black, delicately pitted, with a few brownish bristles near eyes. Clypeus clothed in colourless hairs. Chelicerae orange, promargin with two teeth, retromargin unident. Mouth parts and sternum brownish. Abdomen oval, brown, whole dorsum covered with delicate shining scutum, without hairs, venter yellowish grey or blackish with four lines formed by light dots. Spinnerets light. Legs I black with yellowish tarsus. Other legs generally brown, dorsal surfaces of femora slightly lighter, yellowish grey, basal halves of segments lighter than their distal parts. Pedipalps orange to brown, clothed in dark hairs, cymbium and bulb yellow. Tibial apophysis wider than in the majority of congeners ( Figs 81, 83 View FIGURES 78–83 ), bulb oval, without delimited proximal lobe ( Fig. 79 View FIGURES 78–83 ), with meandering spermophore, embolus stiletto-like with broad base ( Figs 80, 82 View FIGURES 78–83 ).
Female. General appearance as in Fig. 84 View FIGURES 84–86 , slightly larger than male. Carapace as in male. Abdomen with typical markings for Euophrys spp. , coloration dark grey with mosaic of small lighter patches and a few (5–6) pairs of larger light spots and chevrons along midline, dark patches fused into irregular transverse streaks on sides, venter yellowish. Legs yellowish, bases of patellae, tibiae and metatarsi brown. Epigyne very weakly sclerotized, with two shallow, slightly procurved depressions, copulatory openings situated laterally ( Fig. 85 View FIGURES 84–86 ). Internal structures simple, as in Fig. 86 View FIGURES 84–86 .
Distribution. Known from the Drakensberg Mountains of the eastern Free State and western KwaZulu-Natal Provinces in South Africa.
NHM |
University of Nottingham |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |