Hyposoter notatus ( Gravenhorst, 1829 )
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.11646/zootaxa.5290.1.1 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:FD54D381-F123-4958-A03E-6CA71E02D06A |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7971538 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/E62587BF-FFA6-FFC5-FF7E-40AC93436225 |
treatment provided by |
Plazi |
scientific name |
Hyposoter notatus ( Gravenhorst, 1829 ) |
status |
|
Hyposoter notatus ( Gravenhorst, 1829) View in CoL
Campoplex notatus Gravenhorst, 1829 : lectotype ♀ in UWCP, designated by Townes et al. (1965), examined by Horstmann.
Only really likely to be confused with Hyposoter caudator View in CoL , which is very similar in structure and coloration, but has the ovipositor sheaths in the female about twice as long. In Hyposoter notatus View in CoL the hind tibia is normally well darkened at least on the outer side subproximally and distally, whereas in H. caudator View in CoL there is usually little or no darkening. This is rather variable, however, and males may not always be identifiable.
This is a well known parasitoid of many species of polyommatine lycaenid butterflies (eg Horstmann et al. 1997; Shaw et al. 2016). We have seen specimens from the UK, France, Spain, Germany, Italy, and Greece. It has been recorded, though with uncertain reliability, across the Palaearctic from Ireland to Eastern Russia, and also from the Nearctic.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Hyposoter notatus ( Gravenhorst, 1829 )
Galsworthy, Anthony, Shaw, Mark R. & Haraldseide, Håkon 2023 |
Hyposoter caudator
Horstmann 2008 |
H. caudator
Horstmann 2008 |
Campoplex notatus
Gravenhorst 1829 |