Ocotea pontica (Kolakovsky & Schakryl) Doweld, 2018
publication ID |
https://doi.org/10.11646/phytotaxa.379.1.8 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/E86CB90C-4C38-FF9E-FF2E-F9FEFDDEFF4C |
treatment provided by |
Felipe (2024-09-07 01:14:08, last updated 2024-09-07 04:23:24) |
scientific name |
Ocotea pontica (Kolakovsky & Schakryl) Doweld |
status |
comb. nov. |
Ocotea pontica (Kolakovsky & Schakryl) Doweld , comb. nov.
≡ Laurophyllum ponticum Kolakovsky & Schakryl (in Takhtajan 1975: 47, pl. 23, fig. 12; pl. 24, fig. 11, text-fig. 20: 5)—“ Laurophyllum ponticum ” Kolakovsky & Schakryl (in Kolakovsky1962: 44), nom. inval. (Art. 40.1) ≡ Laurophyllites ponticus (Kolakovsky & Schakryl) Schakryl (in Kolakovsky et al. 1982: 204) ≡ Laurophyllites ponticus (Kolakovsky & Schakryl) Schakryl (1984: 146) , nom. superfl.
Type:—[fossil leaves] Pitsunda, Abkhazia (holotype, П-132, Sukhum Botanical Garden, Sukhum, Abkhazia, n.v.).
Occurrence:—Pliocene (Upper Pontian); Caucasus.
IFPNI: 7016879F-ACEC-CD94-8DA8-0A4DF328C9CA.
Note:—The fossil-species “ Laurophyllum ponticum” Kolakovsky & Schakryl (in Kolakovsky1962: 44) was not validly published, since the authors did not designate the type ( ICN, Art. 40.1), based the description on several leaf imprints (Coll. П-132, 153). The fossil-species was validated later by Kolakovsky & Schakryl (in Takhtajan 1975: 47). The structure of the leaf epidermis of the fossil-species is similar with that of several extant Ocotea species ( Schakryl
1965), viz. О. aniboides Mez , О. cernua Меz, О. cordata Меz, О. fasciculata Mez and O. tristis (Nees & Martius) Mez (= О. areolata Mez ) [most similar].
Kolakovsky, A. A., Lakoba, R. V. & Schakryl, A. K. (1982) Goлotipы vысsik рaсtiнiй tрiticныk флoр AbkaZii, kрaнЯЩikсЯ v Сukuмсkoм botaнiciсkoм сadu [Holotypes of the higher plants of the Tertiary floras of Abkhazia kept in the Sukhum Botanical Garden]. Ausumtakua Akuatai abotanikata bahca 27: 182 - 219. [in Russian] Available from: http: // fossilplants. info / publications / B 1 A 847 E 4 - 4290 - 49 C 3 - A 7 CD- 901 EC 95 AA 471 (accessed 26 November 2018)
Schakryl, A. K. (1965) Epidiрмiс ЛavрOvыk dЛi diagнOсtiKi нiKOtOрыk сOvрiмiнныk i iсKOpaiмыk vidOv [Epidermis of the Lauraceans for the diagnostics of some extant and fossil species]. Metsniereba, Tbilisi, 79 pp. [in Russian]
Schakryl, A. K. (1984) K сiсtiмatiki iсkopaiмыk лavрovыk. 3. Лavрoлiсtныi лavрovыi (Laurophyllites) [On the systematics of the fossil lauraceans. 3. Laurifoliaceous lauraceans (Laurophyllites)]. Ausumtakua Akuatai abotanikata bahca 28: 138 - 188. [in Russian] Available from: http: // fossilplants. info / publications / 315 D 2 E 1 B- 8 AFB- 486 E- 8 C 9 A- 6 FB 05 A 0011 C 5 (accessed 26 November 2018)
ICN |
Instituto de Ciencias Naturales, Museo de Historia Natural |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Ocotea pontica (Kolakovsky & Schakryl) Doweld
Doweld, Alexander B. 2018 |
Laurophyllites ponticus (Kolakovsky &
Schakryl 1984: 146 |