Aclista scutellaris, : NIXON, 1957
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.5281/zenodo.5328323 |
DOI |
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5390841 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/E9158786-0616-7D3E-7791-FAD7FBC08620 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Aclista scutellaris |
status |
|
Key to species of Aclista scutellaris species complex in Central Europe
Females
1 Antennae 14-segmented. ............................ A. scutellaris ( Thomson, 1859) complex
– Antennae 15-segmented. ...................................................... other Aclista (not keyed)
2 (1) Mandibles short ( Figs. 9, 10 View Figs , 16 View Figs ). ............................................................................... 3
– Mandibles widely overlapping, sickle-shaped ( Figs. 11-15 View Figs View Figs ). ..................................... 6
3 (2) Body slender; radial cell short, at most a little longer than marginal vein; metascutellum tuberculate to conical. ........................................................ A. angusta ( Kieffer, 1909)
– Body stout; radial cell distinctly longer than marginal vein; metascutellum at most convex. ........................................................................................................................ 4
4 (3) Malar space smooth ( Fig. 16 View Figs ). ................................... A. scutellaris ( Thomson, 1859)
– Malar space with short straight keel ( Figs. 10, 11 View Figs ). .................................................... 5
5 (4) Antennae short with smaller subquadrate subapical and large apical segment (Fig. 27). ................................................................................ A. crassistilus ( Kieffer, 1909)
– Antennae longer with submoniliform subapical segments; apical segment not exceedingly wider than the preceding one (Fig. 26). ..................... A. bitensis ( Kieffer, 1909)
6 (1) Sharp longitudinal keel between toruli present. ................ A. neglecta ( Kieffer, 1907)
– Area between toruli unmodified (keel absent). ........................................................... 7
7 (6) Malar keel feeble, straight, not prominent ( Fig. 15 View Figs ). ....... A. szelenyii ( Móczár, 1938)
– Malar keel strong, angular, prominent ( Figs. 12, 13, 14 View Figs ). .......................................... 8
8 (7) Antennae stout, with submoniliform praeapical flagellomeres (Fig. 29). ..................... ............................................................................................ A. pseudobitensis sp. nov.
– Antennae slender, with quadrate praeapical flagellomeres (Fig. 30). ............................ ................................................................................................ A. pseudosoror sp. nov.
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |