Himalcoelotes, WANG, 2002
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.1206/0003-0090(2002)269<0001:AGLROT>2.0.CO;2 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:876C8F9B-6ECF-48C9-AD2D-B62A236C18BE |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/E9606A5A-D358-E36F-1194-B462F8EAFA16 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Himalcoelotes |
status |
|
KEY TO SPECIES OF HIMALCOELOTES View in CoL View at ENA Females
1. Spermathecae small, rounded, not convoluted (figs. 249, 283, 293)............... 2
– Spermathecae otherwise (figs. 243, 266)... ................................. 4
2. Copulatory ducts broad, situated mesad of spermathecae (fig. 249)...... bursarius View in CoL
– Copulatory ducts not visible or barely visible in dorsal view (figs. 283, 293)....... 3
3. Anterior atrial margin incomplete; copulatory ducts not seen (figs. 282–287).. sherpa View in CoL
– Anterior atrial margin complete; copulatory ducts small (figs. 292, 293)... subsherpa View in CoL
4. Spermathecal large, anteriorly extended; spermathecal heads situated mesally or posteriorly (figs. 255, 266).............. 5
– Spermathecal moderately large, not anteriorly extended; spermathecal heads situated anteriorly (figs. 243, 251, 279)......... 6
5. Spermathecal heads situated mesally; copu
– Spermathecae longitudinally extended, not curved (figs. 247, 253, 279)......... 8
7. Epigynal teeth long, slender; copulatory ducts short, not visible in dorsal view (figs. 242, 243)..................... aequoreus
– Epigynal teeth short, broad; copulatory ducts visible in dorsal view (figs. 294, 295).............................. syntomos
8. Atrium apparent; copulatory ducts visible in dorsal view (figs. 250, 251, 278, 279)... ................................. 9
– Atrium reduced to atrial slit; copulatory ducts not visible in dorsal view (figs. 246, 247).......................... brignolii
9. Spermathecae separated, copulatory ducts extended mesally (figs. 251, 253)................................. diatropo s
– Spermathecae close together, copulatory ducts extended anteriorly (fig. 279)................................ pirum latory ducts not seen in dorsal view (fig. 266)...................... martensi
– Spermathecal heads situated posteriorly; copulatory ducts originated laterally (fig. 255)....................... gyirongensis
6. Spermathecae strongly curved, semicircleshaped (figs. 243, 295)............. 7
Males
1. Cymbial furrow more than half of cymbial length (figs. 245, 258).............. 2
– Cymbial furrow less than half of cymbial length (figs. 268, 289, 281, 291)...... 3
2. RTA strongly extended anteriorly; patellar apophysis curved ventrally (fig. 258)............................ gyirongensis
– RTA slightly extended; patellar apophysis curved dorsally (fig. 245)... Aequoreus
3. Embolus prolateral in origin (figs. 267, 288) ................................ 4
– Embolus basal in origin (figs. 280, 290)... ................................. 5
4. Conductor broad; patellar apophysis much shorter than patellar length (figs. 267, 268).......................... martensi View in CoL
– Conductor slender; patellar apophysis broad, as long as patellar length (figs. 288, 289)........................... sherpa View in CoL
5. Conductor with apex broad, no tooth (figs. 280, 281).................... pirum View in CoL
– Conductor with apex slender, with small tooth (figs. 290, 291)............ subsherpa View in CoL
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.