Wadotes, CHAMBERLIN
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.1206/0003-0090(2002)269<0001:AGLROT>2.0.CO;2 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:876C8F9B-6ECF-48C9-AD2D-B62A236C18BE |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/E9606A5A-D387-E3B4-1228-B454FD79FA8E |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Wadotes |
status |
|
WADOTES CHAMBERLIN View in CoL View at ENA
Wadotes Chamberlin, 1925: 120 View in CoL . – Brignoli, 1983: 483; – Platnick, 1989: 426; – Platnick, 1993: 581; – Platnick, 1997: 672.
TYPE SPECIES: Wadotes dixiensis Chamberlin, 1925 , by original designation.
DIAGNOSIS: Wadotes can be easily recognized by the single, medially situated epigynal tooth of females (fig. 410), and by the presence of proximal cymbial apophyses in males (figs. 412–416). All Wadotes species examined have small AME, and three promarginal and two retromarginal cheliceral teeth (figs. 417, 418).
DESCRIPTION: See description of type species (below).
DISTRIBUTION: Eastern North America, from Nova Scotia to Georgia (map 20).
COMPOSITION: Twelve species were recognized in a recent revision ( Bennett, 1987). One of them, Wadotes primus Fox, 1937 , was transferred to the genus Coelotes by Wang et al. (2001) and is placed here as a member of Bifidocoelotes .
1. Wadotes bimucronatus ( Simon, 1898) .
2. Wadotes calcaratus ( Keyserling, 1887) .
3. Wadotes carinidactylus Bennett, 1987 .
4. Wadotes deceptis Bennett, 1987 .
5. Wadotes dixiensis Chamberlin, 1925 .
6. Wadotes geogiensis Howell, 1974 .
7. Wadotes hybridus ( Emerton, 1889) .
8. Wadotes mumai Bennett, 1987 .
9. Wadotes saturnus Bennett, 1987 .
10. Wadotes tennesseensis Gertsch, 1936 .
11. Wadotes willsi Bennett, 1987 .
Wadotes dixiensis Chamberlin Figures 410–428 View Figs View Figs View Figs View Figs View Figs
Wadotes dixiensis Chamberlin, 1925: 120 View in CoL (male holotype from Lee Co., Alabama, deposited in MCZ, not found).
Wadotes bimucronatus: Muma, 1947: 5 View in CoL , figs. 8, 9, 20, 21, 39, 40 (misidentification).
DIAGNOSIS: Females of this species can be distinguished by the broad spermathecal duct (fig. 411), and males by the shape of conductor dorsal apophysis (figs. 413, 414, 416).
DESCRIPTION: Total length about 5.00– 12.0. From front, anterior eye row slightly procurved, posterior row procurved; eye sizes and arrangements: AME smallest, about half ALE size, ALE slightly bigger than PLE, PME about 1.5 AME size; AME may be separated by roughly their diameter, AMEALE about onehalf AME diameter and subequal to ALEPLE, PMEPLE about 1.5 PME diameter, PMEPME slightly short er than PME diameter, AMEPME about PME diameter. Clypeal height about twice AME diameter, covered with long, strong setae; chilum divided, hairless, short (fig. 417). Chelicerae with three promarginal and two retromarginal teeth (fig. 418). Labium about as long as wide, slightly notched distally. Length of female 1st leg patella + tibia shorter than carapace length.
Tarsal organ very small, situated close to distal end of tarsus, anterior of distalmost trichobothrium (figs. 420–422). Trachea simple (fig. 419). Apex of ALS with 2 major ampullate gland spigots (MAP), 13–20 piriform gland spigots in both sexes; PMS with 1 or 2 minor ampullate gland spigots (mAP) which may be more or less reduced and 37–38 aciniform gland spigots (AC) in both sexes, 2 cylindrical gland spigots (CY) in female; PLS with about 42–48 aciniform gland spigots in both sexes and 2 cylindrical gland spigots in female (figs. 423–428).
Female epigynum with single, median, broad epigynal tooth; atrium reduced to atrial slit; copulatory ducts short; spermathecal heads anterolaterally situated; spermathecal stalks long, enclosed in single, broad bursa; spermathecal bases small, bifid, laterally sit uated (figs. 410, 411). Male palp with one patellar apophyses, short; RTA long, occupying most of tibia, but not beyond tibia; lateral tibial apophysis transversely extend, formed small concavity on distal tibia; cymbial furrow moderately long, with distinct dorsal edge; tegular sclerite with prolateral apophysis; conductor long, strong; conductor dorsal apophysis with two dorsal and ventral teeth; conductor lamella large; embolus basal in origin, moderately long, linear; median apophysis spoonlike, with distal end not sharply pointed; tegular carina not apparent (figs. 412–416).
MATERIAL EXAMINED: USA: Alabama: Dekalb Co., DeSoto Park , December 1937, 1 male ( AMNH) ; Colbert Co., Wolf Den Cave , September 25, 1940, 1 male (Jones and Archer, AMNH) ; Walker Co., Johns of Warrior River , October 20, 1912, 1 male ( AMNH) ; Shelby Co., Oak Mt. State Park , May 9, 1947, 1 female (A. F. Archer, AMNH) ; Colbert Co., Spring Cave, near Maud , September 25, 1940, 1 female (Jones and Archer, AMNH) ; De Kalb Co., Ravine W. of Mentone, July 27, 1950, 1 female (A. F. Archer, AMNH). Georgia: Ft. Benning, November 20, 1943, 1 male (D. E. Beck, AMNH). North Carolina: Macon Co. , Wayali Bald., June 18, 1950, 1 female (A. F. Archer, AMNH) ; Aquane , W83.39, N32.12, 1 male ( AMNH) GoogleMaps ; Highland , April 5, 1929, 1 male (S. C. Biship, AMNH) ; Coly Co., April 29, 1938, 2 females (J. H. Hubbell, AMNH) ; Coly Co., April 29, 1938, 1 male and 3 females (J. H. Hubbell, AMNH) .
DISTRIBUTION: North Carolina, Tennessee, Georgia, Alabama.
AMNH |
American Museum of Natural History |
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
Wadotes
WANG, XIN-PING 2002 |
Wadotes bimucronatus:
Muma, M. H. 1947: 5 |
Wadotes
Platnick, N. I. 1997: 672 |
Platnick, N. I. 1993: 581 |
Platnick, N. I. 1989: 426 |
Brignoli, P. M. 1983: 483 |
Chamberlin, R. V. 1925: 120 |
Wadotes dixiensis
Chamberlin, R. V. 1925: 120 |