Centrioncus decoronotus Feijen, 1983
publication ID |
https://dx.doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.1144.95619 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:565B46A4-C01B-4542-9635-6F3ED6472747 |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/EB138283-FD5F-5201-99FD-83475C08EE8D |
treatment provided by |
|
scientific name |
Centrioncus decoronotus Feijen |
status |
|
Centrioncus decoronotus Feijen View in CoL
Figs 6 View Figures 5–8 , 29 View Figure 29 , 112-116 View Figures 112–116 , 117 View Figure 117 , 118-121 View Figures 118–121 , 122-125 View Figures 122–125 , 153 View Figures 153, 154
Centrioncus decoronotus Feijen, 1983: 76; McAlpine 1997: 175, 2011: 150; De Meyer 2004: 28; Marshall et al. 2009: 6; Lonsdale 2020: 6, figs 153-159, 405, 423, 425; Feijen and Feijen 2021, figs 2, 29.
Centrioncus prodiopsis : Steyskal 1970: 326 (in part, male description and figs 3, 4).
Type material.
Kenya, holotype ♂, Naivasha [0°41'40"S, 36°22'47"E], vii.1937, H.J.A. Turner (NHMUK). Paratypes: 1 ♀, 1 ♂, same data as holotype; 1 ♀, 1 ♂, Thomson’s Falls [now Nyahururu Falls, 0°2'38.98"N, 36°22'13.04"E], x.1934, F.W. Edwards (NHMUK); 1 ♂, Chania Falls, Aberdare range [0°27'16.70"S, 36°43'1.28"E], x.1934, F.W. Edwards (NHMUK); 1 ♀, Ngong [1°21'22"S, 36°40'8"E], ix.1940, G. van Someren (NHMUK).
Material studied.
Kenya: 27 ♀, 25 ♂, Naro Moru River , [0°9'22.93"S, 37°0'50.45"E, 1950 m], 20.vii.1987, H.R. Feijen (RMNH); 6 ♀, 6 ♂, Limuru nr Mrs Mitchels tea plantation, Rain forest , Kiambethu Tea Plantation , [1°7'3.18"S, 36°40'58.11"E, 2167 m], 3.ix.1986, Cobi Feijen (RMNH); 2 ♀, 2 ♂, nr Namanga GoogleMaps Tanzania [but in Kenya], Ol Doinyo Orok forest , [~ 2°31'S, 36°47'E, ~ 1800 m], 0. iii.1986, J. Muhangani (RMNH); 1 ♀, 1 ♂, Thomson’s falls, Nyahururu, [0°2'38.98"N, 36°22'13.04"E, 2329 m], 20.iii.1988, H.R. Feijen (RMNH); 3 ♀, 3 ♂, Nyahuru (ru), Upper Imenti Forest , Meru Distr. GoogleMaps E. Kenya, [0°3'0"N, 37°31'59"E], vii.1973, E. Balyetagara (CNC); 2 ♀, 3 ♂, Laikipia GoogleMaps Co., Thomson’s Falls env. (= Ngare Naro forest ), 0.047°N, 36.377°E, 25.xi.2012, D. Gavryushin (ZMUM); 3 ♀, 1 ♂, Laikipia GoogleMaps Co., Thomson's Falls env ., 0.047°N, 36.377°E, 21-23.xii.2013, N. Vikhrev (ZMUM); many (photograph), Ngare Naro forest (near Thomson’s Falls), 27.xi.2012, D. Gavryushin; 2 ♀, 2 ♂, Central Province , Katura Forest , Nairobi , shaded mixed upland indigenous forest GoogleMaps , 1°14.504'S, 36°49.452'E, 1720 m, 23.iv.2011, A.H. & M.K. Kirk-Spriggs (BMSA); 3 ♀, 1 ♂, Eastern Prov., Nyambene Hills, Itieni forest , at bottom, malaise trap, edge indigenous forest GoogleMaps , 0.24433°N, 37.87016°E, 2142 m, 1 ♀ 1 ♂ 2-16.x.2011, 1 ♀ 18.ix-2.x.2011, 1 ♀ 15-29.xi.2011, R. Copeland (ICIPE); 1 ♀, Central Prov., Ngong road forest, Nairobi , fogging GoogleMaps , 1°18'57"S, 36°44'27"E, ~ 1830 m, 12-14.ii.1999, T. Wagner (ICIPE); 2 ♀, 3 ♂, Eastern Prov., Njuki-Ini Forest , near forest station, sweep net, edge indigenous forest GoogleMaps , 0.51660°S, 37.41843°E, 1455 m, 13.ii.2011, R. Copeland (ICIPE); 1 ♀, 2 ♂, Gatama (i)yu forest, near fishing camp, malaise trap GoogleMaps , 0°58.68'S, 36°41.62'E, ~ 2246 m, 20-27.iii.1999, R. Copeland (ICIPE). In total 53 ♀ and 49 ♂ were examined.
Diagnosis.
Centrioncus decoronotus can be recognised by the mesally depressed, pruinose frons with glossy spots; glossy collar; scutum with configuration of blackish brown and brown (Figs 112 View Figures 112–116 , 113 View Figures 112–116 , 117 View Figure 117 ), basic colour chestnut brown (including humeral calli), blackish sutures around humeral calli, blackish mesal stripe on anterior half, square, mesal, blackish area posteriorly of intrascutal sutures; scutellum brown, dorsally darker, scutellar spines brown; pleura blackish brown (Figs 113 View Figures 112–116 , 117 View Figure 117 ) with chestnut brown anterodorsal anepisternum, greater ampulla and posterior anepimeron; scutellar spine/scutellum ratio: 0.90; apical seta/scutellar spine ratio: 0.91; yellowish brown, strongly incrassate fore femur (l/w ratio: 2.89) with ~ 34.5 tubercles; brown stripe dorsally on distal half of inner side (Figs 113 View Figures 112–116 , 114 View Figures 112–116 ); large central wing spot (Fig. 6 View Figures 5–8 ), mainly in basal section of cell r4+5 till just apically of crossvein dm-m, extending into cell br, cell r2+3 and cell bm+dm; tergites dark brown, thinly pruinose, posterolateral corners whitish pruinose; sternite 4 rectangular, laterally two more sclerotised sections, anteriorly 2 pairs of tiny heavily sclerotised spots (Fig. 118 View Figures 118–121 ); sternite 5 broadening posteriorly, laterally more sclerotised, 1 pair of strongly sclerotised spots anteriorly; sternite 6 trapezoidal, posteriorly 1.6 × as wide as sternites 1-4, two more sclerotised plates anteriorly; female tergite 7 with serrated lateral edges; female 7th spiracle in tergite; anterior sclerite of female sternite 7 short (Table 8 View Table 8 ), w/l ratio: ~ 3.9 (Fig. 119 View Figures 118–121 ); posterior sclerite of female sternite 7 U-shaped, posterior apices sometimes slightly broadening (Fig. 119 View Figures 118–121 ); female cercus rather elongate with l/w ratio: 3.6; subanal plate pentagonal, laterally convex, apex acuminate; spermathecae round, somewhat wrinkled, distinct dimple, some tiny tubercles (Fig. 120 View Figures 118–121 ); common base of outer and median arm of surstylus long, slender; outer arm rounded, deeply constricted near median arm, largest width 1.8 × width at base, 4-6 tubercles apically (Fig. 122 View Figures 122–125 ); median arm slender, rod-shaped, much longer than outer arm, three or four spinous setae apically; inner arm apically acuminate, shorter and narrower than median arm, no apophysis; subepandrial clasper triangular, basal two-thirds narrow, medial apical corner angular, lateral corner extended (Figs 122 View Figures 122–125 , 124 View Figures 122–125 ); cercus (Fig. 123 View Figures 122–125 ) with broad lateral extension on distal third, apically slightly concave.
Supplementary description.
The biometrical data are presented for the series now studied, and compared to the type series. Additional morphological data as well as a few rectifications are presented. Various aspects of the morphology are now illustrated by photographs, while line drawings are presented for flies from Ol Doinyo Orok, a location distant from the type location.
Measurements. For type series of 3 ♀ and 4 ♂, Feijen (1983) provided the following measurements: body length ♀ 5.3 mm and ♂ 5.2 mm, head width ♀ 1.23 mm and ♂ 1.17 mm, wing length ♀ 5.0 mm and ♂ 4.7 mm, scutellar spine length ♀ 0.36 mm and ♂ 0.31 mm. For the much larger series now available, 22 ♀ and 22 ♂ were measured in more detail. In Table 4 View Table 4 , measurements and other quantitative characters are presented for this series. In this table, data are presented for females and males separately. The table shows that differences between females and males for quantitative characters are marginal. The body length and various other measurements are slightly larger in the females. In Tables 6 View Table 6 , 7 View Table 7 the data for females and males are combined, so that large series can be compared with the other Centrioncus species for which large numbers were available. The original measurements of the type series fall well within the ranges provided here: body length 5.15 mm ± 0.04 (range 4.64-5.61, n = 44), head width 1.14 mm ± 0.01 (range 1.02-1.24, n = 44), wing length 4.51 mm ± 0.03 (range 4.09-5.00, n = 39), scutellar spine length 0.33 mm ± 0.00 (range 0.29-0.37, n = 44).
Colour. The specific epithet decoronotus refers to the colourful notum of the mesothorax with its pattern of brown and blackish brown. This pattern is shown well in the fly from the Thomson’s Falls (Fig. 112 View Figures 112–116 ), but is much less pronounced to almost absent in flies from Katura Forest. This is not only due to preservation techniques, but is present in live specimens as can be observed in photographs of live flies from Ngare Naro forest (near Thomson’s Falls) where the pattern is also less pronounced (Fig. 117 View Figure 117 ).
Head. Frons mesally depressed, pruinose with glossy spots lateral to ocellar tubercle (Fig. 116 View Figures 112–116 ), face yellowish brown; occiput mainly blackish brown, ventral edge of occiput and postgena yellowish (Fig. 113 View Figures 112–116 ), thinly pruinose, with median occipital sclerite densely pruinose; length of outer vertical seta 0.34 mm ± 0.00 (n = 35, Tables 4 View Table 4 , 7 View Table 7 ); length of fronto-orbital seta 0.22 mm ± 0.00 (n = 35). In highly enlarged photographs, mid facial region densely microtrichose, with row of microtrichia near eye margin ( McAlpine 1997: figs 21, 22) (see also Fig. 116 View Figures 112–116 ).
Thorax. Collar glossy blackish brown (Figs 112 View Figures 112–116 , 117 View Figure 117 ); scutum and pleura show typical configuration of blackish brown and brown (Figs 112 View Figures 112–116 , 113 View Figures 112–116 , 117 View Figure 117 ); humeral callus brown (not blackish brown as described by Feijen (1983: fig. 7)); scutellar spine/scutellum ratio: 0.90 ± 0.01 (n = 44, Tables 4 View Table 4 , 7 View Table 7 ); scutellar spine/body length ratio: 0.063 ± 0.001 (n = 44); apical seta/ scutellar spine ratio: 0.91 ± 0.01 (n = 21, range 0.83-1.03; Table 7 View Table 7 ); scutellar length/scutellar width (at base) ratio: 0.64; supra-alar carina with supra-alar seta illustrated by McAlpine (1997: fig. 35), seta difficult to see in Figs 112 View Figures 112–116 , 113 View Figures 112–116 .
Wing. Large, central wing spot, mainly in basal section of cell r4+5, extending into cell br, cell r2+3 and cell bm+dm (Fig. 6 View Figures 5–8 ); distinct infuscation along central section of vein M4; some variability in intensity of central spot, specimens from Katura forest have, for instance a darker spot than specimens from Naro Moru; two vague apical wing spots mentioned by Feijen (1983) in cells r2+3 and r4+5 often not visible; vein M4 continuing distal of crossvein dm-m in straight line to wing margin; vein CuA+CuP from vein CuP onward extending under angle of 30° to wing margin in almost straight line; cell cua triangular.
Legs. Femur 1 with distinct brown stripe (Figs 113 View Figures 112–116 , 114 View Figures 112–116 , 117 View Figure 117 ) dorsally on distal half of inner side, not vague as stated by Feijen (1983); femur 1 strongly incrassate, l/w ratio: 2.89 ± 0.01 (n = 43, Tables 4 View Table 4 , 7 View Table 7 ); two rows of spinous setae (Fig. 114 View Figures 112–116 ) on distal two-thirds of femur 1 with 8.4 ± 0.1 setae (n = 72, Tables 4 View Table 4 , 7 View Table 7 ), inner row with 4.5 ± 0.1 setae, outer row with 3.9 ± 0.0 setae; two rows of tubercles (Fig. 114 View Figures 112–116 ) on distal three-quarters of femur 1 with 34.5 ± 0.3 tubercles (n = 71, Tables 4 View Table 4 , 7 View Table 7 ), inner row with 16.4 ± 0.1 tubercles and outer row with 18.1 ± 0.2 tubercles; femur 3 (Fig. 115 View Figures 112–116 ) distally with 4.9 ± 0.1 tubercles (n = 83, Tables 4 View Table 4 , 7 View Table 7 ) in single row, except for 1 ♀ and 1 ♂ with each one tubercle in second row; setal formula 3.9, 4.5, 18.1, 16.4, 4.9 agrees well with formula of type-series given by Feijen (1983): 4.0, 4.3, 17.8, 17.0, 4.9.
Preabdomen. Tergites blackish brown, thinly pruinose, with whitish pruinose posterolateral corners; female tergite 7 less dark and glossier; posterolateral corners of tergite 2 more densely pruinose; sternites pale brown; membranous ventral areas with large dark lateral spots (Fig. 117 View Figure 117 ); sternite 1 rounded rectangular, anteriorly strongly constricted mesally (Fig. 118 View Figures 118–121 ); intersternite 1-2 dark, laterally acuminate, with thin lateral connections to main sternite 2; sternites 2-4 rectangular (Fig. 118 View Figures 118–121 ), slender, more or less of equal width; sternite 5 somewhat broadening posteriorly; sternite 6 trapezoidal, posteriorly ~ 1.6 × as wide as sternites 1-4 (Fig. 118 View Figures 118–121 ); sternite 4 laterally with two ill-defined more sclerotised sections and two pairs of small heavily sclerotised sections anteriorly (Fig. 118 View Figures 118–121 ); sternite 5 laterally with more sclerotised sections, anteriorly with pair of strongly sclerotised plates; sternite 6 more vaguely sclerotised laterally and anteriorly with pair of strongly sclerotised plates; sternites 1 and 2 glossy, sternite 1 with some microtrichia laterally, sternite 2 with some microtrichia in posterolateral corners; sternites 3-6 pruinose.
Female postabdomen. Tergite 7 with slightly serrated lateral edges (Fig. 119 View Figures 118–121 ); 7th spiracle in tergite; anterior sclerite of sternite 7 relatively short with w/l ratio: 3.9 (Table 8 View Table 8 ); posterior sclerite U-shaped; anterior and posterior sclerites of sternite 7 of ♀ from Ol Doinyo Orok forest similar to paratype illustrated by Feijen (1983), but posterolateral sections of posterior sclerite somewhat expanded (Fig. 119 View Figures 118–121 ); cercus rather elongate, l/w ratio: 3.6 (Table 8 View Table 8 ); spermathecae of Ol Doinyo Orok ♀ (Fig. 120 View Figures 118–121 ) similar to type series.
Male postabdomen. Genitalia identical with illustrations by Feijen (1983) but can be annotated as follows: for ♂ from Ol Doinyo Orok forest, surstylus, subepandrial clasper, cercus and ejaculatory apodeme + sac illustrated (Figs 122-125 View Figures 122–125 ), as location is furthest removed from localities of type series; median arm of surstylus curved, long (Fig. 122 View Figures 122–125 ) (due to curve median arm appears slightly shorter in Feijen (1983: fig. 140); outer arm of surstylus with 4 tubercles (and 1 underdeveloped one) (average of 6.0 tubercles (n = 4) in Feijen (1983)); median arm and basal half of outer arm clothed in microtrichia on outer side; 3-dimensional character of subepandrial clasper with small differences (compare Figs 122 View Figures 122–125 , 124 View Figures 122–125 vs. Feijen 1983: fig. 141), very constricted basal section of subepandrial clasper, mentioned by Feijen (1983), also found in Ol Doinyo Orok ♂; cercus (Fig. 123 View Figures 122–125 , Table 8 View Table 8 ) with broad lateral extension on distal third, apically slightly concave, length/greatest width ratio: 1.4; ejaculatory apodeme + sac/length of body ratio: 16.5% (paratype from Chania Falls with ratio 16.3%) (Figs 125 View Figures 122–125 , 153 View Figures 153, 154 ).
Egg. Female from Ol Doinyo Orok forest with two almost fully developed eggs in abdomen. Eggs measured respectively 0.99 mm and 1.00 mm in length with longitudinal ridges spanning from anterior pole to posterior pole; in addition, more simple “lines”. Ridges (indicated with R) with tiny elongate pits along their length, while lines (indicated with L) form more integral part of roughly hexagonal microstructures between ridges (Fig. 121 View Figures 118–121 ).
Distribution and habitat.
The collecting localities are shown on the map for Eastern Africa (Fig. 29 View Figure 29 ). Centrioncus decoronotus was now found at altitudes varying from 1455-2329 m. Feijen (1983) reported it as occurring between 1200-2350 m. The eastern branch of the Great Rift Valley appears to form a barrier between C. decoronotus and C. aberrans . The gravid female was collected in March at the beginning of the long rains.
Remarks.
Feijen (1983) described the lateral sides of female tergite 7 as "rather irregular", but showed the same serrated edges in his fig. 28, as now found in the specimen from Ol Doinyo Orok (Fig. 119 View Figures 118–121 ). Other species of Centrioncus or Teloglabrus with serrated sides of tergite 7 are not known. The paratype from Thomson’s Falls had with 16.3% the highest ejaculatory apodeme + sac/length of body ratio. The Ol Doinyo Orok ♂ had with 16.5% a similar giant ejaculatory apodeme + sac (Table 9 View Table 9 ).
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
SubFamily |
Centrioncinae |
Genus |
Centrioncus decoronotus Feijen
Feijen, Hans R. & Feijen, Cobi 2023 |
Centrioncus decoronotus
Feijen 1983 |
Centrioncus prodiopsis
Speiser 1910 |