Aleochara (Xenochara)
publication ID |
https://doi.org/ 10.21248/contrib.entomol.69.1.091-173 |
publication LSID |
lsid:zoobank.org:pub:9B8BCFC0-C491-45EF-9BC8-04A6B6B7DB8C |
persistent identifier |
https://treatment.plazi.org/id/F078561B-7216-710B-FCAE-6232FDCDFBB1 |
treatment provided by |
Felipe |
scientific name |
Aleochara (Xenochara) |
status |
|
Aleochara (Xenochara) View in CoL fugax IABLOKOFF-KHNZORIAN,
1962
( Figs 19–21 View Figs 7–23 )
Aleochara fugax IABLOKOFF-KHNZORIAN, 1962: 112 View in CoL f.
Material examined: 1: “ Erevan, Dzhrvezh, ASSR.
24.5.48” (cKhn).
Comment: Aleochara fugax , whose original description is based on a holotype and one paratype from Armenia (Vedi, Vinogradov sandstone cave, 8.IV.1958), is listed as Aleochara incertae sedis in SCHÜLKE & SMETANA (2015). An examination of the above specimen from the Khnzorian collection, evidently not the holotype, revealed that A. fugax is highly similar and undoubtedly closely related to A. parvicornis FAUVEL, 1900 of the subgenus Xenochara . It very much resembles A. parvicornis in habitus, antennal morphology, coloration, dense punctation, and the derived chaetotaxy of tergite VIII, but is distinguished by less dense punctation of the whole body (particularly so on the abdominal tergites VI and VII) and by a more slender distal portion of the spermathecal capsule. Habitus, posterior margin of tergite VIII, and spermatheca of A. fugax are illustrated in Figs 19–21 View Figs 7–23 . For illustrations of A. parvicornis see ASSING (2009a).
The Armenian record of A. parvicornis by LIKOVSKÝ (1971) most likely refers to A. fugax .
No known copyright restrictions apply. See Agosti, D., Egloff, W., 2009. Taxonomic information exchange and copyright: the Plazi approach. BMC Research Notes 2009, 2:53 for further explanation.
Kingdom |
|
Phylum |
|
Class |
|
Order |
|
Family |
|
Genus |
Aleochara (Xenochara)
Assing, Volker & Schülke, Michael 2019 |
Aleochara fugax
IABLOKOFF-KHNZORIAN, S. M. 1962: 112 |